logo Sign In

vote_for_palpatine

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Jul-2006
Last activity
9-Jun-2010
Posts
1,114

Post History

Post
#394247
Topic
Socks or Real People?
Time

There are two apparently new members at OT.com, HelpMeObiWanKenobi and Put Captain Solo in the Cargo Hold. Are these new, real posters or is this a new thing regular posters are doing?

Because if it is some new deal, I want to create a sock named ManyBothansDiedtoBringUsThisInformation. Either that or SompeetalayVereTanTeNachtVakeCheeta. That's right, I'm reserving sock names.

Post
#394217
Topic
This Thread Is Currently About...Bingo and/or Wings!!!
Time

Sorry to respond so late, but the message was late in getting to me here on Rura Penthe, where I am serving my probated sentence. I realize you didn't send me here, but I figured I better find that hot chick that could turn into Shatner. That way if my probation was permanent, I have already made the best of it.

(Something about this reads creepy - ah, here's the edit button)

Post
#394091
Topic
This Thread Is Currently About...Bingo and/or Wings!!!
Time

Petition to Threadmaster in re: retroactive probation for poster "C3PX"

The subject of the thread during the period in question was "William Shatner". Poster "C3PX" responded in post #4 with "KHAAAAAAAAAAN!" - presumably referring to Shatner's line from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Strictly speaking, this line of dialogue was not solely delivered by Shatner. It was given in a similar way by Jason Alexander on Seinfeld (c. 1996-1997) and again by the ensemble cast in the movie Free Enterprise (1999). As multiple performances of this line of dialogue can be confirmed, it was the responsibility of the poster "C3PX" to specify which one he intended, but there was no accompanying detail providing such specificity.

I appeal to the Threadmaster, for great justice, to retroactively pass a judgment of PROBATION!!! on poster "C3PX" for his neglectful ambiguity in this matter. Though I myself opined - correctly - that every post on every thread all across the internet is ultimately about William Shatner, the burden falls upon the poster to provide de jure proof of this, not de facto proof based on my ultimately correct supposition.

I only hope I am not out of turn here in suggesting punishments for thread participants, but it occurred to me that action must be taken and nowhere in the thread is there a resource availing one of the opportunity to take such action. If I have stepped too far, I am prepared for the consequences. The greater good of bringing more Shatner into the thread must be served.

Sincerely,

vote_for_palpatine

VFP/rmc

Enclosures upon request

Post
#393845
Topic
OFFICIAL MLB THREAD
Time

Again, just so we're clear, I don't want Bonds in. But when he takes steroids to improve himself, at least that helps his team. If you are going to cheat, do it in a way that helps your team. Having a guy hitting baseballs like it's a video game helps the team. I don't think what Rose did as manager helped his team in any way.

As to the second question, gambling is a 100+ year problem in the sport. Steroid use has been around for only about 30-40 years and was a widespread problem for only about 20 years. Gambling was never condoned by MLB, whereas steroid use was, at best, ignored until 2003-2004. It would be mighty hypocritical of baseball to sock a lifetime ban on guys they looked the other way on during their playing careers.

But I wouldn't be bothered if proven steroid cheats were banned for life.

If Pete Rose wants his lifetime ban removed, he could start by going on speaking tours talking about the evils of gambling. But it seems his position, then and now, has always been that gambling is no big deal. Ask Michael Franzese what a big deal gambling is.