This user has been banned.
Bingowings said:
And by association my own.
He also has a big bum.
Bingowings said:
ah, dammit :D
TV's Frink said:
Ah, I understand now.
Well then :)
Bingowings said:
Damn, I can only think of Mr Mackey now... pwnt :D
TV's Frink said:
twooffour said:
TV's Frink said:
Oh shut up, you fucking hypocrite troll.
Well, as you can see here and elsewhere, I can and do miss stuff all the time - you just won't see me dancing around it like pussy (=denying, resorting to insults, silence and then denying, etc.) after being pointed it out.
Seeing as how neither you nor CP are capable of this "feat", who's the hypocrite here?You are the hypocrite.
You make a big deal about how people don't bother to read your posts, or fully read them, or read them correctly, and therefore get things wrong. Then you did the exact same thing.
So how about I call you a hypocrite? I've maybe done this once or twice in recent times (or thrice, perhaps, to make it crimes), you've been doing it unapologetically for weeks now, without even ONCE admitting to it - so if your bullshit "be perfect/better or don't criticize" philosophy is anything to go by, you should've let that one pass and shut up in your little corner over there.
But as I've already said, anyone can be stupid and miss something. Denying and pretending like it didn't happen, is what takes extra dishonesty, and that's what you get the contempt for.
Bingowings said:
^Great, after listening to that ill informed racist ranting I don't mind listening to your ego farting even less.
Calling Pat Condell a "racist" = instant permanent dumbass award.
I guess so much for your evaluation of my ego, then...
TV's Frink said:
Oh shut up, you fucking hypocrite troll.
Well, as you can see here and elsewhere, I can and do miss stuff all the time - you just won't see me dancing around it like pussy (=denying, resorting to insults, silence and then denying, etc.) after being pointed it out.
Seeing as how neither you nor CP are capable of this "feat", who's the hypocrite here?
First off, nice spelling of "sarcasm."
This isn't a fucking thesis we're writing, it's how we PERSONALLY rate the films. I don't need to follow your "rules" for rating films.
I rated based on my enjoyment, not on the academic theories of film-making.
What a surprise that you've basically called someone's "opinion" WRONG.
doubleofive said:
I'm LOST in this thread thanks to ignoring Plank (2x4). But the forum in general seems to have lost none of its sense.
Complaining about losing track for ignoring a posting user, is like an ostrich complaining about being eaten. Or Neo about not getting it up.
Just sayin', since you're reading this :D
Oops, missed that!
CP3S said:
Okay, okay! I'll peel it for you. Here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M114bK4qaiM#t=36
I rest my case.
CP3S said:
C3PS said:
You do live in your own little tiny world, don't you?
I've just rebutted that, so nope, sorry.
but I don't need to because everyone who just read your post is thinking it right now.
Yea, like that kid in the schoolyard, "you know I could kung fu you all in 2 seconds, but I'd rather not".
Gimme a break! You just CAN'T. You have to rely on your buddies to pat you on the back and agree with you in order to attempt coming off as "convincing", because you can't actually substantiate anything yourself. Neither can they.
Utterly pathetic.
captainsolo said:
Despite all of the correct criticisms of TPM and RLM's spot-on review, TPM still works as a movie. That's it. It's not particularly great or bad just a really good dose of meh.
Well, I would say about the same about ROTS. Maybe even more so.
At any rate, my question was rather how someone could rate it equally to ROTJ - because I think saying that VI was kinda a "meh disappointing finale to the trilogy" and "TPM was still meh, not horrible" is losing grip of proportions.
But thanks anyway, just something I wanted off my mind ;)
As for me, I'm struggling to give those movies an exact rating, so I think I'll pass.
CP3S said:
twooffour said:
Just wondering whether the people giving the two movies the same (or almost) the same thing have actually thought things through. :)Probably not. We are all a rather daft lot around here and we tend not to think things through, or to even think at all for that matter.
Sadly, that's very often true (even though you're trying to hide behind saercasm), and I really think that someone rating TPM equally to ROTJ hasn't thought things through.
At any rate, I just asked an innocent question, so grats on bringing in your personal grudges for no reason at all. I usually don't do that :)
The Aluminum Falcon said:
The high trees actually might help. Something to alter it from being typical Earth generally is interesting. As Bingowings pointed out, the desert in ANH had two suns and more than one moon unlike Earth.
Thinking about it, I probably am very biased since I live about an hour away from some of the forests used in ROTJ... That's probably why they seem so un-exotic. :)
I've been to the so-called "Zauberwald" (magic forest) in the German Alps, and hell, that one looks 100 times more excotic than Endor :D
Go there after it rained, and you'll start believing in fairytales :D
CP3S said:
No, I'm not stupid, you're stupid!
Nope, sorry.
Considering you just insinuated I hadn't grasped a post of yours that I've replied to... I'm afraid posting pictures won't help your case.
CP3S said:
"NEVER GO UP AGAINST A SICILIAN WHEN DEATH IS ON THE LINE! HAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHA!
This would've been funny, if it weren't so fucking pathetic in the context.
CP3S said:
twooffour said:
But hey, you know, don't go there (like any other normal member of a forum would), just keep asking for copies.
Or GO BY THE FUCKING DVD, to support the company. Do you think you can afford one little season of a year-old show?Uhhh... Fink didn't ask for copies of anything...
You do live in your own little tiny world, don't you?
If anyone has the german dvds or a dvd with a german audio track it would be amazing if you could send me the audio
So you don't like it when I use the term "fail" on you, do you? You'd like me to stop, hm?
Well, you don't give me any reason.
CP3S said:
twooffour said:
Well from the looks of it, and according to CP, I DID get it (that I should check my cache to make sure a picture can be posted), but you refused to clear up things after I pointed out some inconsistencies in that, so my complaint is also valid.
And that is where you are being a dumbass and failing to connect the dots. The solution to the mystery of the second computer was to CLEAR ITS FUCKING CACHE and see if it still worked. Fink's solution applied to BOTH computers, I had to write a post to spell this out to you, and you're still bitching about it. No one refused to explain shit to you, you were just too fucking dumb to figure out the obvious on your own. I never said you "DID" get it, just that you understood one small part of it. Those "inconsistencies" you pointed out aren't inconsistencies just because you didn't understand them.
Isn't this a bit cheap of you, considering I've actually replied to that post of yours, and you just went over it completely?
Yea, I've ALREADY GOT THAT LONG TIME AGO. So you weren't "confirming my guess" after all, eh? Hehe.
And yes, obviously what I had in mind was that it was very unlikely for that other computer to have had the image (esp., as I'VE TOLD YOU, it clears its cache after each session).
And if its cache is empty of that one, then obvious there IS an inconsistency, as the problem lies somewhere else. Right?
You ARE a disingenuous prick, after all, and I'm about to lose what little respect I still have for you.
CP3S said:
twooffour said:
*Monkey noise*
I'm done humoring you.
Here you go, little guy. I even opened it for you because I anticipated you having potential difficulties.
So what was that what I said about "backing stuff up"?
Let's get this straight, after I break down a post of yours that clearly conveys something different than you claim you meant, marking the quotes and explaining how they come off (something a normal human being without Asperger's wouldn't even need explained) - all you have to say in response is this?
After all the disingenuous denial, you're now presented with an analysis and have nothing to say, except for weak insults?
Congratulations, CP, for shooting yourself in the foot with this one.
Rather ironic that you should fall into this dumbass trap, after being warned:
"And the only way you could possibly argue against that, is by ANALYZING your post and demonstrating how it does fit with "confirming my guess", rather than "having missed it".
Not by hurling empty ad hominems at me."
LOL.
Here's something you dropped from your schoolbag:
Do your homework!!
