Bingowings said:
In the radio version they don't have the cash and Han takes precious metals needed for parts, over the protests of the Rebel leadership.
Frankly, we never see what's in those boxes.
Tyrphanax said:
Pat Man may, or may not be Pat Man.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle applies here.
Easily solvable through observation; the uncertainty collapses regularly.
corellian77 said:
William Shatner may or may not be the best actor that ever lived.
Disagree. A definitive answer is known: He is not the best actor that ever lived.
Pasta is delicious.
In this thread, you either post something you think everyone here agrees with or you state that you disagree with something someone said in this thread.
The List Of Things On Which We All Agree
AntcuFaalb said:
Can the music be Yub Nub? ;)
CELEBRATE THE LOOOOOOOOVE
Dominic, I agree
with everyone.
Hal 9000 said:
I think the concern is that seeing the title "Despecialized Edition" in the menu right before watching the film only reminds them that the Special Editions exist.
....well, it's called The Despecialized Edition for a reason. And you label things according to what they're called, so that you can distinguish them. And you learn to accept the past and move on.
Yeah, it sounds to me like Alec Guiness was a quality, respectable actor who did a silly movie for money. He didn't enjoy dealing with pestering younger actors, and he really got tired of obsessive fans knowing him from this one role, instead of any of the more serious roles from his career which he actually enjoyed. So what?
In which some guy does a total ROTJ rewrite: http://disgruntledindividual.blogspot.com/2012/10/opinion-reconstructing-star-wars.html
Unfortunately, this isn't actually feasible for a fanedit.
AntcuFaalb said:
I live in Columbia, MD (USA)
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat. That is where I live.
Also, can we agree on a name for this guy that isn't ASCII art? I love the art, but it's not pronounceable.
stretch009 said:
pat man said:
Gomu69 said:
Seeing the color correction in the remastered edition had me curious about that sacred technicolor print since it's such a miracle to have it at all for reference; if there was anything that concerned me the most about what fans have been dealing with for so long, it's the potential for future generations to be brainwashed by how Lucas wants everyone to view the films as they are instead of keeping such a beloved piece of pop culture in tact to stand the test of time. Unless I didn't read into the details enough to which anyone is welcome to correct me, it saddens me to think we may never see Empire or Jedi in such a preserved condition beyond the limitations we've compromised with; despite the reality of the situation at hand, just being able to not have to settle with the official versions and relive them as we remember them is a priceless opportunity to which Harmy and everyone else who made this possible deserves eternal praise as the rebels who dared to do the impossible.I agree with you. Harmy is working on V2.0 of Empire(which will be done some time next year), and then V2.0 of Jedi(about 2- 2 1/2 years from now).
???
That can't be how long we have to wait for the other two.
Welcome to the world of hobbyist productions. Time is money. No money? Lots of time.
Don't tell me that didn't make sense.
Jonno said:
So apparently this was shown in support of RotJ - ring any bells for anyone?
Not only was that really enjoyable to watch, but...
Qui-Gon Jinn said:
There's always a bigger fish
Why should I ask you questions?
I don't really like the colors either, no.
aalenfae said:
If somebody (cough, cough) Adywan (cough), could replace the obviously-CGI space ships and such in AotC and RotS with models, I think a great service would be done.
This is why I wish I had significant amounts of time and knowledge that I currently lack.
To see images, go to
http://postimage.org/image/tjif92167/
http://postimage.org/image/fr40dfaen/
http://postimage.org/image/kr1gldg1b/
Frankly, it doesn't seem to be an improvement.
Well, a more intricate plot, then. Trade disputes!
negative1 said:
Kingherb said:
negative1 said:
Kingherb said:
Harmy said:
I like the font, sue me ;-) I think it's nice and simple and feels kinda retro.
Were to picky on here XD
you mean 'we're' too picky on here... not 'were'..
haha
later
-1
Indeed! although i wish you had put a capital at the start of your sentence...
Damn you George what have you done to us haha.
it is not needed on sentence fragments like this..
that's why i use ellipses... A LOT!
haha
later
-1
That's not
grammatically true.
later
timdiggerm
Have we talked about how many Sith-sabers can be removed from the prequels? Sidious seems a must, based on his ROTJ dialogue, but Maul seems impossible. Dooku, as a former Jedi, is fine.
Tyrphanax said:
"The programmers of www.StarWars.com put up a temporary webpage with mocking the "Godzilla" campaign with a poster lettered with the green glow reading "Plot Does Matter - May 1999", in reference to Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace."
This made me laugh out loud.
In all fairness, TPM has a deeper plot than a monster movie. It's true.
Unless he just meant DVD9...
Hasn't he decided to stop doing all things public? The man takes retirement seriously.
Mrebo said:
They add nothing but were supposed to push along the symbiotic narrative of TPM (which I thought fell flat on all levels).
Ooooooooooooh.
I had never picked up on that.
Right then, ask Troyig all your questions!