As much as it's a cool idea (and as much as Ady won't do it), the problem here is that it implies Yoda would use technology in training Luke. He doesn't even use the sabre for training except in cut scenes.
ray_afraid said:
Ryan McAvoy said:
Call me crazy but I'd have one of those over an X-Wing anyday.
So, is it Crazy McAvoy or Ryan Crazy? ;)
I do love the Americana that was put into the Naboo fighters design though. It's something I overlook when listing what I like about the Prequels. So now there are two (of them) 1- the design of the Pod racers and 2- the design Naboo fighter.
I did not realize how cool the Naboo Fighter design was until I walked through the 1920s airplanes at the Air & Space Museum in Washington, DC.
FanFiltration said:
I was very happy to hear that the next James Bond film will NOT be directed by "Skyfall" director Sam Mendes.
"Mendes had hinted that he would direct Bond 24, however in March 2013, he announced he would not direct the 24th Bond film in order to focus on stage work."
Source = http://www.hitfix.com/news/skyfall-director-sam-mendes-likely-to-return-for-next-james-bond-film
Why are you happy to hear this?
TV's Frink said:
timdiggerm said:
TV's Frink said:
timdiggerm said:
Wait, who are you?
I fixed your punctuation.
I find your lack of sentence disturbing.
I fixed your Star Wars reference.
Thanks. Like Luke wearing his poncho at the chess table, but unlike my initial attitude in this thread, I care.
TV's Frink said:
timdiggerm said:
Wait, who are you?
I fixed your punctuation.
I fixed your lack of sentence.
Wait who are you?
Yeah, but a speech is also really boring and violates the no-dialogue-ending-sequence rule.
Ronster said:
a money spinner
Ooh unlike the other six okay
Now that they've got Zod out of the way, it would make sense for the sequel to feature Luthor, Darkseid for the JL film, and Doomsday for the post-JL film.
Lord Haseo said:
Has anyone else noticed that Adywan taking out the Darth Vader scenes in ROTS doesn't keep the "No, I am your father" reveal a secret until ESB? I've read on facebook that the last we see of Anakin in ROTS is when he's on that medical stretcher thing on Coruscant after he was beaten by Obi-Wan. We can obviously assume that he survived without being shown how he exactly got put into the suit. Plus, before Vader and Obi-Wan duel Vader says " I've been waiting for you, Obi-Wan. We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you, I was but the learner; now I am the master." Anyone with half a brain can come to the conclusion that Vader is Anakin. Also, when Aunt Beru says "He has too much of his father in him." and Uncle Owen responds "That's what I'm afraid of." you don't think anyone is going to come to the obvious conclusion that Vader is Luke's father after Obi-Wan and Vader's conversation if they are watching this in order?
So, a few things.
First, we don't know just what Ady's going to do. At some points, he's mentioned adding a second apprentice, but I'm not sure that will actually happen.
Second, cutting out the suit scene should also involve cutting out the stretcher. Obi-wan leaves Ani dying on the lava shores, and we never see him again. Ani turned evil (so Beru's lines are okay), Ben killed him, and then the audience thinks that Ben is lying to Luke in order to protect himself (afterall, he killed Luke's dad) and make Luke hate Vader (using him to help overthrow the Empire). Only later do we learn that Ben lied in a different way.
I would find this even less plausible than the instant riots.
Particularly the cardboard cutout
Had absolutely no trouble downloading the video using the Firefox Addon "DownloadHelper"
I could be wrong, but I think the 2006 GOUT DVD was the first official home release lacking that.
Maybe, though there's also the chance that they wanted to show she's not perfect.
Did they (the game's writers) treat him that way because he's gay, or did they treat him that way and he's gay? The first one is a problem, the second one is realistic.
It's like someone read the older Mormon threads and thought "I could make a new one just as good" then tried and did a bad job!
There's big and then there's BIG, no? I didn't mean that the Blockade Runner had to be the biggest ship ever, but it would help if the SD was clearly bigger than anything previously seen.
Bingo, I really had to squeeze my eyes tightly shut after seeing that. Horrifying.
IDEA:
No large spaceships in the prequels.
When that Star Destroyer cruises over the camera at the beginning of EP4 following a familiar ship (including the Blockade Runner in ROTS was a good idea), it should be the absolute biggest thing we've ever seen, to make us recognize the insane power of the Empire.
doubleofive said:
Then the screen is filled with something flying overhead. Is it an entire Star Destroyer? No, its just a huge tower of something bigger.
It's a shame you haven't heard of perspective.
I kid.
Trying to replicate the beginning of ANH ... doesn't make much sense to me. It's supposed to be something bigger.
Take note, ROTJ fan-editors.
Oh gosh
Ronster said:
Anyway now that's out the way...
Lando says "What about those..."
Oh never mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6s8kpo9IDgdoubleofive said:
Of course they used the same physical model.
But modified you can clearly see the space between the Radar on top and the Deflector shield is different...There is a reason they did not use the model for the SSD I think because it was lit from inside with fluroscants and the bridge perhaps would not of stood up so well to the camera on that model.. They had no Macro cameras or ice cube cameras in those days so the standard bridge stood in for it but was modified clearly.
Uh...how was it modified? That gap you're seeing is visible because it's a different angle.
Those objections everyone just raised?
I agree.
Bingowings said:
(four times if you include Yoda in the PT).
I'm almost afraid to ask...
what?