dclarkg said:
His/her face remembers me a little bit of general Grievous
I think you want the word "remind", not "remember"
But I definitely agree, there is no threshold
Great!
(except admittedly we Mormons believe in a few essential ordinances).
Oh uh.... but you said.... that's a contradiction?
Christ is the judge if our actions were pure and motivated by faith. He doesn't have a set scale for everyone. He judges us individually. I also agree that if one is truly converted and has face in Christ, the good works will follow on their own, and any true disciple shouldn't even have to worry about how much good they are doing. A true convert simply does good for the sake of love and discipleship.
It is helpful, in terms of motivation, to not have works and salvation so tied together.
Tobar said:
ratpack1961 said:
In the latest episode did anyone catch Anthony Daniels in a cameo as the guy who tells them to find Luminara?
That was actually Brent Spiner aka Data from TNG.
Some people can't tell robots apart. Racists.
darth_ender said:
If someone does not exercise good works, they are not exercising enough faith to truly accept Christ.
I think this is specifically where we differ - the idea that there's an "enough faith" threshold necessary. Protestants believe that good works and faith go hand in hand, though, because good works are the result of faith.
darth-gary said:
The Hobbit movies are passable I guess, but they don't have scenes like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOqT5_AAPgo
To be fair, that particular scene is more sort of thing to see after The Battle is over.
generalfrevious said:
BTW Is Cameron ever going to make those Avatar sequels? It's been nearly five years since the the movie came out, and that is not a good sign for a possible franchise.
Yeah, I've been wondering that for awhile now. He keeps talking about making them, but still isn't actually doing it.
CatBus said:
There was a conveyor belt scene in AOTC? Seriously? Wow did that movie make no lasting impression.
KilroyMcFadden said:
The Hobbit is going to be able to be saved. Imagine a fan edit coming in at about 2 hours. There's a really strong story with great acting hidden inside all of that bloat. The PT on the other hand...
I'd settle for a 4 hour film with intermission based on the Extended Editions
but yeah.
Oh yeah, I guess a 3d-printed radar dish should have been a pretty good sign that there's a 3d-printer involved.
Just so there's no confusion, I made a comparison
Hey, if that kid wants to believe that's canon, who are we to stop him?
Also where's my brightness? This appears to be "300: The Phantom Menace"
I was being sarcastic.
Fang Zei said:
My own explanation for why Lucas changed it is that Shaw as Anakin's ghost was supposed to be representative of "the good man" Luke's father was before becoming Darth Vader.
Probably should have used Jake Lloyd then.
They're not even canon anymore so who cares? Things aren't interesting unless they're canonical. Thanks, Disney.
xhonzi said:
Johnny Ringo said:
darth_ender said:
Clearly the stormtroopers of the OT are not the Aussie clones of the PT.
You mean Kiwi.
Too bad New Zealanders are a bunch of cocky a-holes descended from criminals and retarded monkeys.
New Zealanders- "Throw another shrimp on the barbie and ride around on your kangaroos all day."
No no no, you're thinking of Australians.
I would prefer no ghosts
Oh now there's an idea. Have the graverobber in the film, don't reveal who she is, but also make it seem that Luke has turned. Then, reveal he's still good and the graverobber is Leia!
There are a few problems, even if I think it's a pretty solid theory
aalenfae said:
I feel like a complete dweeb updating a months-old thread, but ... I'm back!
Well, I'd like to say "I'm back!" and I was going to upload some new, awesome stuff I've been working on in my absence, but it turns out that lighting struck my computer (almost literally), and a great deal of my prequel edit work was lost. HOWEVER, that does not mean that I will stop the edits. It just means that they will take a lot longer than expected. I intended to do a surprise release around the summer, but they'll likely take several months longer than that (and will perhaps be a little less extreme, but we shall see!)
In the meantime, I'd like to officially say that I'm back from my long time away, and in the coming months, you can expect some more cool stuff coming your way!
Oh man. How much was lost?
RicOlie_2 said:
I just noticed, with timdiggerm's reposting, that the second picture (in his order) has what looks like a crashed Star Destroyer in the background. That should be interesting. And we now know what the pig things are going to be used for.
Interestingly, it's very clearly an EU Interdictor
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Interdictor-class_Star_Destroyer
Here's an imgur mirror of the latest art leaks, ordered as I saw fit: http://imgur.com/a/joWWK
Oh, but ANH Revisited doesn't have Jabba
AntcuFaalb said:
Bingowings said:
There are plenty of ANH edits using ANH:R as a source.
Any theatrical ones?
I'd pretty much like to watch pre-SE ANH adywanized.
But if there are going to be changes like upgraded effects, why not use the SE?
NeverarGreat said:
Erik Pancakes said:
It's actually set 5 years before ANH, not 10.
If that's the case, why does Obi-wan look so young?
Okay, I haven't actually seen the show, but after doing some quick reading, isn't his only appearance as a hologram recorded around or just after ROTS? So the message is something like 13 years old by the time it shows up on Rebels.