timdiggerm

TServo2049 said:

Yes, the recompositing was the least upsetting part of the SE. (And some of it was necessary, because some of the VFX portions of the negative we're on Color Reversal Intermediate and had faded to the point that nothing could be recovered from them.)

 Plus, given the goals of the SE (that is, not-about-historical-preservation), it completely makes sense to recomposite to remove matte lines and all that.

Well, there's a lesson to take over to PT-Revisited and its ilk! Thanks, Mike, that was really, really interesting.

AntcuFaalb said:

regularjoe said:

Harmy said:

Why does the thread need any action, if there's nothing new to discuss concerning its topic?

 I keep hoping for a Special Edition of this thread with all off topic posts removed.

The SE of this thread will be released on 15 Feb 2028 and will contain a few more off-topic posts as well as the following CGI added to all of them.

On 15 Feb 2039 Adywan will release his own SE of the SE of this thread which will remove some off-topic posts, clarify/reinterpret others, and change the CGI to the following.

Everyone: Please accept my sincere apology for this post. I love you all.

 Hey! There is nothing wrong with the classic thread contents! They hold up pretty well compared to your digital crap!

Oh my gosh it would be like...10 pages.

Lord Haseo said:

That thread is usually rather barren as well

 I can think of a great way to fix that

Lord Haseo said:

brash_stryker said:

Jackpumpkinhead said:

i just caught this in the comparison vid #2:

i know that this is just a test version, but i hope ady will do something about the obvious green screen in dooku's hair

 This thread is about episode 5.

 Be that as it may this thread is unequivocally desolate. Might as well talk about something while we're anticipating news. 

 Nope! Did you know you can talk in other threads about other topics? This thread is for ESB:Revisited. A different thread is for the Revisited Saga, and thus the Revisited Prequels. That thread can be found here.

Frank your Majesty said:

skyjedi2005 said:

Does anyone really miss not being able to read Sword of the Jedi.

 So the ink from the books vanished? Refusig to read a good story because it is no longer canon is like feeling obliged to read every crappy novel, just because it is canon.

 He's talking about a book (or trilogy of books?) that was never published, because of the big EU upheaval.

TServo2049 said:

And I especially like the profile view of the saucer that makes the crew look like giants...can't find a picture of that online...

From movie-screencaps.com

.Mac. said:

The second Death Star is destroyed. The Emperor and his powerful enforcer, Darth Vader, are rumored to be dead. The Galactic Empire is in chaos.

It's probably nothing, but is anyone else curious about the word choice there?

 Well where are the bodies? Who can prove they didn't escape the explosion? Many would hope they did - and so the rumors spread. Some would even take advantage of the situation and become shadowy impostors.

Well...I probably won't watch The Cage. I've seen it, and I know I'm going to see again later, you know?

So... this list but starting w/ Corbomite?

I do think this part is important

from novels for adults and teens to storybooks and stickerbooks for younger kids

So we're probably not looking at the simultaneous release of 20 novels here. Chances are, they'll fill in some key stuff from the missing 30 years, but won't tell everything.

SilverWook said:

And you should be watching production order, not broadcast order.

 Why?

I'm a long time Trek fan who hasn't actually seen all of any of the series, just lots of bits here and there. But now, I'm watching TOS. Only 2 episodes in, so far, but am surprised at how surprised I am at the symptoms of the sixties. Crewmen leering at Rand, overly creepy Twilight-Zone-esque Charlie, etc.

It is good though, don't get me wrong.

Battle scene 23?

TV's Frink said:

I don't know what that's supposed to mean.

"Ways people feel about a lot of posts"

Wow she is very teary eyed.

ATMachine said:

There's a hilarious alternate reading of the "Fly, yes; land, no!" line on the little-known Story of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade tie-in audio CD. (Skip to the end to hear it.)

 Oh my gosh, that is amazing. I can't even figure out how to punctuate quoting it.

That's an interesting idea, but ... let me know when someone pulls it off.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Oh, it uses computers. Analog computers.

 Somewhere, a little optical compositing machine is whirring away, quickly overlaying avatars onto posts

Nocturnaloner said:

TV's Frink said:

 Worst. Bullet. List. Ever.

 The content I take no responsibility for.  Blame the internet!

The formatting though, is down to the way this board is set up.  Why can't we see the actual BBcode?  Do you have any input on that?

 BBcode? Who said this board uses BBcode?

boredom3031 said:

What do I like about the prequals?

Well, not too damn much.

 From the first post:

And don't bother replying with things like "No, there is not." or "The Prequels are terrible."

Melatius said:

I love how the article describes the movie as: "The story is set 'a long, long time ago in a galaxy not too far from here' where Grand Moff Tarkin (Peter Cushing) rules the Galactic Empire from his Death Star, an enormous artificial planet managed by Imperial Storm Troopers. ..."

I think he needed to watch the movie again! :-)

 Other than small expository dialogue mentioning the Emperor, he didn't miss much

Is that 2016 then?

• Definitely looking forward to Chappie
• Unsure if Jurassic will be good
• Hoping beyond reason that Trek is good
• Pretty sure TFA will be good but a little too rehashy
• Unsurprised the reviews said Jupiter was awful