Not gonna lie, now that I've seen it with the Imperial March, I'm not sure I can go back.
But I do like the lack of tubing.
Ziggy Stardust said:
Nice trailer!
Hey Frink, when it's completed, can you post it on Youtube? My computer sucks at downloading.
I don't understand how youtube is preferable, since all you're doing there is downloading.
I just wanted to let you know, Frink, that I was looking at this impressive page when I got about 1/3rd down and actually said, in a terrible accent, "Now there are two of them!"
Yeah, Penguino, I don't think Asylum's copycat films should count. They do that for everything, on purpose.
....what.
Google+ seems okay... but it sure is empty thus far.
There is, however, a significant difference between LOTR and the OT. LOTR had loads of color-grading applied to it to begin with. Scenes were tinted every which way on purpose, from the get-go.
A: Not one bit, he's here.
Q: Does RedFive miss RedFive?
A Lego minifig before anyone else.
1. Oh god I don't really want to get involved in this, do I?
2. He just told Congress not to extend the Bush tax cuts.
Yeah, I'm going to have to look into fan-fixed versions of the LOTREE Blu... sigh.
Actually, does anyone know of comparisons between the EE Blus and the EE DVDs?
Also this is wildly off topic, isnt it....
ferris209 said:
Ziggy Stardust said:
Bluegrass is the only genre of music I listen to that doesn't suck in these modern times of ours.
That's because it hasn't sold out.
Oh, but you're so wrong. Bluegrass is the sold-out version of Old Time: http://bluegrasswest.com/wordpress/?p=56
ray_afraid said:
greenpenguino said:
As the title says, at some point in those films there was something in it that you liked.
You do know what happens when you ASSuME things, don't you?
This is why I always presume.
If they're just production blueprints, won't they simply show the one section that was built and then reused at different angles? Weren't we debating the implied room, rather than the actual set?
Or was even that up for debate?
Maybe you can make them more ominous somehow?
I actually think the Benny Hill music starts too soon. That music is traditionally used for zany run-around situations, but you've got it playing during the slow droid-unfold sequence. I think it would work better if you let the droid-unfold be super-ominous, then played Benny Hill starting when they come through The Shield.
Discuss? Already have! http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/No-but-seriously-What-we-like-about-the-Prequels/topic/11950/
Good point! Sorry about that!
And Frink, that hasn't happened to me in a long time. Good job.
TV's Frink said:
You want the thread where S_Matt called us all idiots and left the forum.
Jerkwads, Frink. It was jerkwads.
As for the ESB-preference... I dunno. I think the Asteroid Belt sequence is fantastic, though I acknowledge that a lot of that is John Williams.
For Narnia!
Close the blastdoors! Close the blastdoors!
Wait this sort of feels like a diversiiiii...
Nah, I'd rather hear everyone's opinions?
dark_jedi said:
Well on my new system 1 channel mono comes out just the center speaker
This is unfortunate
just like it is supposed to
Not necessarily. But obviously, given that this is the case, it makes 100% sense for you not like the mono-mix.
Also, you may want to use periods sometimes. I am really not sure what some of that post meant.
Harmy said:
I see your point none but if we start demanding the "original" version of the end credits, while the other one was also made in 77 and is pretty much the same and definitely doesn't effectively change the film in any way, we would be totally playing into the cards of those who claim we are lunatics.
I actually believe that if there were two different versions during the original theatrical run, the most true original is the one that was most widely seen.
I agree with both points wholeheartedly. It's a thing to note, but not care about in terms of that hypothetical future release.
To be fair, I'm not sure there's ever been a community so focused on the differences as to bother with the credits. Not that the credits aren't a part of the film, but they are the part people find the least interesting/important. So I'm not surprised no one's documented this before...
but I'm glad it's happened.
Harmy said:
I see that Tolkien and Lucas could shake hands, altering their earlier works to account for inconsistencies with their newer works. Sneaky little hobbitses!!!
This is actually really common practice in the world of books.