timdiggerm

TV's Frink said:

Perhaps you recall the NNRRPPB! thread?

Please, enlighten me.

Hypothetically. A digital creation is only as long-lived as its copies. No copies? Short life.

DominicCobb said:

Serling1979 said:

And which one is the worst? *runs for cover*

Not the worst per se, but I never liked the vocal backing to the celebration at the end of TPM. Other than that I can't think of anything. Except Jedi Rocks.

The chorus is a little weird there... but it is the Emperor's Theme in a different key/octave/tempo, so that's pretty cool.

Also, what about Lapti Nek? Better than Jedi Rocks, but...

You know what works better? Only as much continuity as any writer feels like. The "Seasonal Timelines" model does a terrible job of explaining why all timelines shown to viewers after a certain point lack Maude Flanders.

Well, maybe they'll hire Conan O'Brien to write the series finale, whenever that happens?

jonathan7 said:

 Sorry for recycling idea's this thread is so long though I haven't read many of the pages.

It's definitely okay. This thread is so long that probably only Bingo knows what has already been suggested.

Asteroid Field, definitely. Try watching that scene in... whatever that black&white version of DJ's V3 with just ABC's soundtrack is called. So good.

mverta said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wanted to return here to let everyone know about the commencement of Legacy 2.0, but now that things are going again, I really need fewer social media sites to check rather than more, so all future discussion will be happening in the forums.

Well... good luck to you. I don't need more sites to check, though.

kenkraly2007 said:

So just  because we support anything GL does where called  Lucas apologists?

Yes. It's unwavering devotion without thought.

There was a pretty big internet outcry when the ROTJ "NOOOOOOO" was revealed. It's not a majority, but it is bigger than before.

canofhumdingers said:

How is it the wrong thread?  This is something I noticed in the Despecialized Edition of ESB & I posted it in the ESB DE thread as something for Harmy to possibly fix in the next version he just mentioned doing.

Oh, sorry, you're right, more or less. I seriously thought I was in the ESB:Revisited thread.

Yeah, it's just the same crushed black as everywhere else in all three films.

Also, this is the wrong thread.

No, it looks to me like even in the GOUT, the middle of the ship was in shadow. The 2004 version, darker and with the crushed blacks, turns that shadow into empty space.

But... he's not acting?

Well, here's a relevant video: 4 year old kid learns Vader is Luke's father

Fenriz said:

I read that the Dark Jedi Versions use alot of picture softening, which is not very true to me

Not so much that there's picture softening on DJ's part, but just that he's working from a fairly low-quality source.

That makes a lot of sense, unfortunately. As I think I mentioned somewhere else on this great big forum, The Maker Movement comes to mind. Unfortunately, I can't find a good article summing the whole thing up, but it's basically people that make stuff. And by stuff I mean anything. There are things called "hackerspaces" in some cities now, where people get together to work on projects, and these projects include Book Scanners, 3d Printers, CNC Machines, as well as more mundane stuff. Given that these guys often have the ability to fabricate their own parts, I don't know why a 35mm scanner or telecine or whatever would be beyond their abilities.

Of course, with the Maker Movement, there is no real "they", because anyone could get involved. Still, I bet it's doable.

Oh, I guess I should have asked this here:

Why is 35mm equipment so much more expensive than 16mm?

Puggo, if I may derail this further...

What makes a 35mm system so much more expensive than a 16mm? Obviously the film is twice as big, but I don't understand why this would make a huge difference.

Oh gosh, left or right, I just can't decide!

Just wanted to point out...

WhatsMyName said:

4. Wasn't it always meant for luke and leia to be bro and sis?

No, it was not.

But a star wars movie without Han Solo, doesn't make it  star wars. PT exempt.

This makes no sense

Somehow, The Tyrphanax Look just isn't grabbing me.

Personally, I loved Battle of the Heroes in ANHR.

In response to complaints that my avatar has changed and complaints that I now resemble Anchorhead(ohgodnothtat), I'm starting a new contest, entitled "What should my avatar be?", where "my avatar" refer's to the avatar of the user timdiggerm, who is me.

Now accepting entries!

That explains the difference perfectly.