Jaitea said:
Harmy said:
Well, actually, Corruscant is far from being a prequel creation - it was created by T. Zahn in his Thrawn trilogy and it was first shown in the 97SE of ROTJ. But I totally agree with the basic sentiment of not adding anything that was prominent in the PT.
Visually, its image
J
...Blade Runner?
005, he does a lot of really great work, so thorough. I can't wait to see his comparisons of his mother, before and after George had her!
Okay, so this isn't Prequel related, but I didn't think this deserved a new thread:
I think it's probably well known that John Williams' various scores from around the same time period all feel similar (Raiders & ESB). It's also pretty well known that, when ET sees the kid dressed as Yoday, Williams inserts a bit of Yoda's theme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrVEHszxL7E
But am I wrong in thinking the music before that (starting at 1:35 in the above video) sounds like a happy version of Jabba's theme? Jabba + Ewoks, if you will.
Sepharih said:
This is really rough and needs sound FX as well as further audio editing, but I just wanted to see how people felt about this as an alternative to the silly "high ground" dialogue in ROTS.
You want to remove that? Don't try it!
Oh.
Actually, that was pretty good.
! D: !
How dare he deprive all of his fans of that one extra letter, all because of greed!
I could never blame George Washington!
I guess this is spam? But spam that is at least directed at the right audience.
Which does remind me of the question: What are the Sith revenging?
Yeah, as much as "Revenge was always fake" is a fun conspiracy theory, I don't see any credence for it.
Harmy said:
Underneath the target I pasted another, darkened target in order to simulate the matte line that would have been a part of the original compositing
yesssssssssssssss
There's a bit of an issue where Grievous appears to be standing far from Obi at 0:08, and then is quite close at 0:25. Also, the disappearance of his guards between those two shots is unfortunately conspicuous.
005, I fully support the G+ Hangout idea.
Also, I want to come to all those panels, so that's pretty good. Not that we're big enough for panels.
How many really active members do we have, anyway?
Couldn't you also determine speedup rate by doing pitch comparison on some of the music?
dark_jedi said:
You do realize it is going to make it hard to enjoy these movies now, I will be focusing in on all the crap now.
Man, that's been my problem ever since I started reading this site. It's all 005's fault! Matte lines...
g-force said:
this will shed light on the very top layer of the onion
Not sure why you haven't just told us instead of telling us you'll tell us.
dark_jedi said:
So you want to squeeze more detail out of the more static scenes, well what about the rest LOL.
I'm guessing he just won't squeeze as much detail out of them?
Not sure they had the ability to properly erase the legs in the 80s, but today it should be totally doable.
Swinging with the monkeys in the trees was definitely the worst scene.
And I liked that movie.
You could also look at Puggo Grande, a 16mm transfer. It has a different aspect ratio, with some cropping, and the colors are slightly funny, but it does have dirt!
Just so you know, it's 70mm, not 77mm. The 35mm was what most people saw in theatres in 1977, while the 70mm print was shown in some large theatres. 35mm and 70mm each refer to the size of the film.
TV's Frink said:
Rob said:
timdiggerm said:
So, chances of you restoring matte lines, boxes, etc?
Jesus Christ don't make Harmy answer this again. Also don't be stupid and gay.
It's bad when we are gay?
:-(
Given the Freddie Mercury avatar, I don't know what to think.
Also, I don't remember the last time anyone asked that question, although maybe I asked it recently. If so, I forgot.
Also, if he's putting in things like subtitle jitter, it's not that outlandish.
Yet again, I really recommend you never post twice in a row. Edit your first post if you have more to say.
All I did was use Google.