timdiggerm

I guess this is spam? But spam that is at least directed at the right audience.

Which does remind me of the question: What are the Sith revenging?

Yeah, as much as "Revenge was always fake" is a fun conspiracy theory, I don't see any credence for it.

Harmy said:

Underneath the target I pasted another, darkened target in order to simulate the matte line that would have been a part of the original compositing

yesssssssssssssss

There's a bit of an issue where Grievous appears to be standing far from Obi at 0:08, and then is quite close at 0:25. Also, the disappearance of his guards between those two shots is unfortunately conspicuous.

005, I fully support the G+ Hangout idea.

Also, I want to come to all those panels, so that's pretty good. Not that we're big enough for panels.

How many really active members do we have, anyway?

Couldn't you also determine speedup rate by doing pitch comparison on some of the music?

dark_jedi said:

You do realize it is going to make it hard to enjoy these movies now, I will be focusing in on all the crap now.

Man, that's been my problem ever since I started reading this site. It's all 005's fault! Matte lines...

g-force said:

 this will shed light on the very top layer of the onion

Not sure why you haven't just told us instead of telling us you'll tell us.

dark_jedi said:

So you want to squeeze more detail out of the more static scenes, well what about the rest LOL.

I'm guessing he just won't squeeze as much detail out of them?

Not sure they had the ability to properly erase the legs in the 80s, but today it should be totally doable.

Swinging with the monkeys in the trees was definitely the worst scene.

And I liked that movie.

You could also look at Puggo Grande, a 16mm transfer. It has a different aspect ratio, with some cropping, and the colors are slightly funny, but it does have dirt!

Just so you know, it's 70mm, not 77mm. The 35mm was what most people saw in theatres in 1977, while the 70mm print was shown in some large theatres. 35mm and 70mm each refer to the size of the film.

TV's Frink said:

Rob said:

timdiggerm said:

So, chances of you restoring matte lines, boxes, etc?

 Jesus Christ don't make Harmy answer this again. Also don't be stupid and gay.

It's bad when we are gay?

 

:-(

Given the Freddie Mercury avatar, I don't know what to think.

Also, I don't remember the last time anyone asked that question, although maybe I asked it recently. If so, I forgot.

Also, if he's putting in things like subtitle jitter, it's not that outlandish.

Yet again, I really recommend you never post twice in a row. Edit your first post if you have more to say.

All I did was use Google.

So, chances of you restoring matte lines, boxes, etc?

No, his son was born in 1993, probably a decade before "Jango" was thought of.

Ultimatejedi04 said:

Finally a SCI yoda for Phantom Menace! It is so much better that the creppy puppet they used in the film. Now to the crap. 

You mean CGI? But yes, much better.

Greedo shot first? What is Lucas trying to say? I mean when Han shoots him first of all its a blue bug eyed creature so who care about him.

This is, however, a change that's existed since 1997.

Obviously you can tell that it's not HD, but it looks much better in context than it did as a still image. Looks about as good as we're gonna get. Thanks for all the work, Harmy!

Ultimatejedi04 said:

I of course like everyother hardcore fan bought the blurays and was pissed. Need simple instructions to burn all of the deleted scenes on a septate dvd. I have a OT box set on dvd with all of the theatricals but not many deleted scenes so I would like some help so I can sell the crappy blurays

Several problems

1. It's probably not legal, because you'd be selling your blurays later but keeping the discs

2. You're looking at a two or three step process: Ripping the discs to a computer, and then burning whats on your computer to a disc

3. If you really want to put them on a dvd, not a bluray, you'd have to downgrade the quality from HD to standard-def before burning\

4. Instructions on how to do all these things exist. Google?

Any chance we could get a clip of this latest version, in the context of the scene? That way we'll be comparing its lightness/darkness/quality/etc to the scene, not the GOUT.

Hmm. I prefer Jaitea's latest SE-based version, but this is an improvement.