logo Sign In

theprequelsrule

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jun-2011
Last activity
21-Aug-2025
Posts
928

Post History

Post
#1145710
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

adywan said:

theprequelsrule said:

adywan said:

theprequelsrule said:

For those who are conflicted over TLJ, I recommend playing the game Kotor2 (with the restoration mods of course). The latter shows you how to challenge and subvert Star Wars while still being respectful of the source material. Just an awesome game/experience.

I hope the moderators are okay with me posting this here.

But isn’t that game set a long time before the prequels? so it doesn’t have anything it needs to follow and nobody we know from the films even in it. So no built up expectation in out minds or in the books people have read as to what a certain character should be.

Exactly so. Which is why it works.

But how can that even be a way to show how you should do a so called respectful version of the ST when it doesn’t even have to follow anything that came before it? It can’t.

A respectful way of subverting Star Wars…not a respectful version of the ST. To subvert Star Wars using the OT characters is disrespectful. Han Solo had completed his arc in the OT…but he reverts in TFA to being “solo” again.

Post
#1145693
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

adywan said:

theprequelsrule said:

For those who are conflicted over TLJ, I recommend playing the game Kotor2 (with the restoration mods of course). The latter shows you how to challenge and subvert Star Wars while still being respectful of the source material. Just an awesome game/experience.

I hope the moderators are okay with me posting this here.

But isn’t that game set a long time before the prequels? so it doesn’t have anything it needs to follow and nobody we know from the films even in it. So no built up expectation in out minds or in the books people have read as to what a certain character should be.

Exactly so. Which is why it works.

Post
#1145660
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

Return of the Jedi: 9/10

Ford and Fisher mail in their performances.

Kinda, yeah, but shouldn’t a bad performance by two of the three leads result in something less than a 9/10?

A fair point. My response is that because the film focused on Luke more than the others, their performances did not hurt as much as they might have. Plus, awesome space battle at the end!!!

Post
#1145657
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

yhwx said:

theprequelsrule said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

theprequelsrule said:

yhwx said:

theprequelsrule said:

In an ideal world, George Lucas would have kept directing and writing films, keeping his craft sharp.

Yeah… that didn’t really work out.

I suspect something else: without him, there will be no more great Star Wars films.

There’s been two since he stepped down.

Which ones?

The two that have been made so far.

I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call them great, but not sure why you feel the need to ask that question.

There’s been three good movies.

So that means you liked Rogue One I guess?

I did. I don’t get all the hate around it.

Me neither. But I did not like it. I rented it (!) from my local video store and fast forwarded through the last third. The Vader sequence at the end seemed like the biggest, cheesiest piece of fan service ever.

Post
#1145652
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

…can never happen.

We who?

Myself for sure, but I think others too. Maybe even you?

So how about it? Do you prefer the scenario I postulated or the present condition of Star Wars?

I’ll be honest I didn’t read past the part I quoted because I’m lazy. But I like the ST so far, so I guess not for me.

Oh. Maybe read it all and let us discuss in a respectfull manner?

I thought you claimed to remember me.

I do. Irreverent at times, but usually respectful!

But you have not addressed my scenario. Would you have liked to seen movies about Luke and Leia rebuilding the galaxy or do you prefer what we are given in the ST?

That’s not answerable because you’re asking me to compare a hypothetical set of movies to one that already exists.

Hmm. I think it is. I liked TFA, but would definitely have preferred a screen adaption (or HBO adaption) of Heir to The Empire. Have you never run through alternatives to the Alien 3 film we got and said, “Man, that would have been so much better!”?

Post
#1145645
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

theprequelsrule said:

yhwx said:

theprequelsrule said:

In an ideal world, George Lucas would have kept directing and writing films, keeping his craft sharp.

Yeah… that didn’t really work out.

I suspect something else: without him, there will be no more great Star Wars films.

There’s been two since he stepped down.

Which ones?

The two that have been made so far.

I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call them great, but not sure why you feel the need to ask that question.

There’s been three good movies.

So that means you liked Rogue One I guess?

Post
#1145640
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

…can never happen.

We who?

Myself for sure, but I think others too. Maybe even you?

So how about it? Do you prefer the scenario I postulated or the present condition of Star Wars?

I’ll be honest I didn’t read past the part I quoted because I’m lazy. But I like the ST so far, so I guess not for me.

Oh. Maybe read it all and let us discuss in a respectfull manner?

I thought you claimed to remember me.

I do. Irreverent at times, but usually respectful!

But you have not addressed my scenario. Would you have liked to seen movies about Luke and Leia rebuilding the galaxy or do you prefer what we are given in the ST?

Post
#1145633
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

TV’s Frink said:

theprequelsrule said:

…can never happen.

We who?

Myself for sure, but I think others too. Maybe even you?

So how about it? Do you prefer the scenario I postulated or the present condition of Star Wars?

I’ll be honest I didn’t read past the part I quoted because I’m lazy. But I like the ST so far, so I guess not for me.

Oh. Maybe read it all and let us discuss in a respectfull manner?

Post
#1145631
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

My 2017 opinion:

Star Wars: 10/10

What can I say? Perfect movie

Empire Strikes Back: 9.5/10

The Yoda parts get boring. There, I said it.

Return of the Jedi: 9/10

Ford and Fisher mail in their performances. Hamill is great. The Emperor is menacing and awesone.

The Force Awakens: 7/10

Feels like Star Wars. The first half is 8.5/10, the second is 5.5/ 10

Revenge of the Sith: 6.5/10

I like Hayden Christensen in this for some reason. Dialogue is bad of course, but he tries.

TPM: 5/10
AOTC: 4/10

Post
#1145611
Topic
The Sequel Trilogy we wanted...
Time

…can never happen. In an ideal world, George Lucas would have kept directing and writing films, keeping his craft sharp. He has Maria by his side, complementing his strengths, compensating for his weaknesses. Around 1990, George realizes that he does not need any more advanced special effects to make more Star Wars films; he just needs good stories. He makes the ST focusing on Luke’s efforts to rebuild the Jedi and Leia’s efforts to rebuild the Republic. The films are released in 1993, 1995, and 1997.

Post
#925019
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

It’s been a while.

Random wall of text review!

Loved Rey, BB8, the overall feel of the film. The main OT characters were actually unnecessary and felt forced into the film (except Luke - who was barely in it). The more minor one’s (Chewie and the droids) fit in nicely. The filmmakers knew they could never make a villain as good as Vader so they made one who was literally a Vader wannabe; pretty clever actually. Ren was a 7/10, but could easily have been a 2/10, so good job. There was more humour in the BB8 “thumbs-up” scene than in the whole prequel trilogy. Rey and BB8 are “classic” characters, worthy to stand beside the OT cast. Other than “Rey’s Theme”, the score was very forgettable. This was as good as could have expected, with the exception of the poor score. Snoke is a terrible name and not at all frightening as a character, and I fear for VIII and IX since he will probably be in it more. Abrams was a safe and uninspired choice as a director, but I think he gave it his all. Han’s death did not affect me like it should have. His character seemed to have taken a step back from the OT. I miss the Han from Zahn’s novels. Starkillerr base was unnecessary WE DID NOT NEED ANOTHER DEATH STAR! Carrie Fisher…yikes. Escape from Jakku and Rey-Ren fight were the highlights in regards to action scenes. Glad the duel was not too choreographed.

Almost as good as ROTJ, which is what I had hoped for.