That guy with no name

Telion said:

That guy with no name said:

ThiscouldbeR2D2 said:

Yeah, you’re right. Why would moisture vaporators be needed on a planet with clearly a lot of moisture in the air, judging by the blue skies and clouds? What are your thoughts, Ady?

Firstly, Blue skies are a sign of low moisture, not the other way around…

Also, the skies on Tatooine are blue because the skies on Tatooine (Tunisia) ARE blue… They’ve been desaturated on home media (especially in the UHD) but have always been and meant to be a deep and bright blue…

I’m not sure why we have this argument every few months. Tatooine has blue skies. Get over it.

Not to make the argument cyclical but just to point out how unwarrented you’re snarkiness. The only thing anyone was saying is the colourgrading on the orginal ANH:R was felt better on the eyes not the 2020 release. Also Thick coud cover is a sign of high moister which has been added is some shot or made more apprent with the new grading. Also, also even your own images of Tunisia is a perfect example of looking more like the Cyan/blue from ANH:R than BLUE from ANH:RHD. That said as long as Ady is Happy noone is here to argue with him. With you though? Absolutely if you’re gonna through your weight around.

I’m not throwing my weight around. Just sharing my opinion which happens to be at odds with you. I didn’t mean any offense.

YAREL_RGP said:

Detail: ALI…

 
Detail: UHD…

Well, it’s important to note that this shot was digitized in 2K in 1997 to add the rope holding Han, so the UHD not only includes that shot with a clearly lower resolution, but also suffers from excessive DNR for the 3D conversion, which caused the image to lose detail.

Yeah, the point of the comparison is that this isn’t sourced from the UHD. Or you’re right, it would also have quality loss. Also good to note that the 97 filmouts also had fake digital grain added on top to disguise the new CG! So yeah, doubly worse…

NeverarGreat said:

That guy with no name said:

the skies on Tatooine are blue because the skies on Tatooine (Tunisia) ARE blue… They’ve been desaturated on home media (especially in the UHD) but have always been and meant to be a deep and bright blue…

If they’ve been desaturated on home media, does that not imply that they’re meant to be desaturated? You may as well show us pictures of Mexico City and claim that all the Hollywood movies that give it a yellow color grading are wrong. At that point, your complaint is with color grading itself, not the artistic intention behind it.

By home media I don’t mean every single release, just the UHD. Even the 2011 BD has had the correct sky saturation, though the hues and other colors were off in that release. Also the original SD version of revisited also suffered from desaturation due to Ady’d at that point undeveloped cc skills. The sky color in these comparisons is correct. I should know, I’ve spent the past 10 years color grading Star Wars, (as you have also been) and you as much as I who’s worked on many film prints, you always get that deep blue when you dig deep enough. It’s supposed to be like that. Toning it down would make the sky appear darker than it should be…

ThiscouldbeR2D2 said:

Yeah, you’re right. Why would moisture vaporators be needed on a planet with clearly a lot of moisture in the air, judging by the blue skies and clouds? What are your thoughts, Ady?

Firstly, Blue skies are a sign of low moisture, not the other way around…

Also, the skies on Tatooine are blue because the skies on Tatooine (Tunisia) ARE blue… They’ve been desaturated on home media (especially in the UHD) but have always been and meant to be a deep and bright blue…

I’m not sure why we have this argument every few months. Tatooine has blue skies. Get over it.

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

That guy with no name said:

Hey guys, I’m not trying to “gotcha” anybody, but I think that 4K77 is just the UHD, but color timed and regrained! And these two sources were created almost 40 years apart! TN1 are such hoaxers omg.

UHD

4K77

UHD

4K77

This is all such great fun…

That’s the smoking blaster!

Isn’t it something that TN1 actually thought they could get away with punking us? But thank the good lord we have Little Nemo and his vast intelligence to make us see the truth!

Hey guys, I’m not trying to “gotcha” anybody, but I think that 4K77 is just the UHD, but color timed and regrained! And these two sources were created almost 40 years apart! TN1 are such hoaxers omg.

UHD

4K77

UHD

4K77

This is all such great fun…

Little Nemo said:

First of all I want to say this is all great fun and I’m not trying to “gotcha” anybody, but in the 4K clip compilation the dirt/dust that got through the Reliance 4K restoration seems to match that of these “ALI” clips, which isn’t helping dispel my theory that these are sourced from the UHD, re-timed (often appealingly so!), sharpened and re-grained. Just to highlight a few, comparing grabs from the D+77 and the vid Sonny Hale posted:

No I don’t always have this much time on my hands, but today I did lol. Thoughts?

I don’t know if you knew this —it’s kind of a secret, imao— but it’s the same movie lol. There are many pieces of dirt in 4K77 that also appear in the UHD. Does that mean that 4K77 is just the UHD? Hmmm? There are also many instances of new dirt in the ALI shots, and even missing dirt that’s on the UHD. This might be a surprise to you but you’re not the first person to discover this…

Also, remember that the previous post where you said the UHD screencap was wrong and wasn’t actually the UHD? Still waiting on your response to that, even though it seems to me you were actually using D+ for it, and YOU were actually dead wrong —oh well. It seems some never learn… “i kNoW scReencAps arE aN impERfect sCIenCe”

Am I the only one who actually prefers the change? I think it flows fine. Even if it does break the 180 rule… which, if you know anything about film, is done all the time, even in Star Wars…

UHD color correction example:

Broom Kid said:

It’s been a locked room for almost 20 years now, and the people who got locked in all those decades ago frequently don’t know how to act anymore, LOL. If they ever did, considering when it was that the doors got nailed shut.

What was the reason they closed up shop again?

Grand Admiral Thrawn said:

Glad this change is getting the love it needs to be cleaned up. Ady is also restoring it for ANH:R HD.

https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1626717

I wonder how he’ll approach it…

I’m finally finished with this shot…

Both the SE and the print source for this shot are highly degraded. I’ve isolated most, if not all, the foreground elements from a cleaned-up shot of the 2011 BD, then registered and laid everything on top of the 4K77 background. This was very difficult as the rotoscoping in the SE is horrendous, so a lot of lost information had to be restored from other sources. Not to mention the tedious cleanup to the 4K77 source itself… I still have to repaint the lasers and add missing muzzle flashes, but for the most part, this shot is finally restored and up to standard to fit in with the surrounding shots, finally…

ThiscouldbeR2D2 said:

Why was that first closeup shot of R2 extended by a few seconds?

He just switched the shot with another one from later. I’m unsure why, but it’s been like this since the SD version, right Ady?

adywan said:

Clip Time !

A fix that i wanted to do for ANH:R when i started, but no matter how much i tried it never worked. It’s the shots of 3P0 when he spots the sandcrawler in the distance. It was an obvious flipped shot due to the oil stain being on the opposite side of his torso suddenly. Rotoscoping 3P0 to fix the problems with the shot being flipped was a nightmare. I could never get it to look anywhere near passable . It was just impossible when doing the SD version and i thought i may stand a better chance when a HD versions became available. But i kept failing, right up until a couple of years ago when i decided to shelve the idea .

But sometimes, long after i’ve given up, i decide to give something one last try. I’m so glad i did because i worked out how to do it to a level that i feel works so i can finally cross that continuity error off my list.

In this comparison video you’ll notice that the official version goes out of sync with the Revisited one. This is because i had to shorted one shot and extend another for this to work once the rotoscoping with finished.

I have tried posting this numerous times now and everywhere i’ve uploaded it, it has instantly been blocked. My only option was to upload it to google drive. I don’t know how long this will last due to the bandwidth restrictions , but it was my only option. You can view the preview or download the clip to see it in better quality ( which is what i would recommend )

See if you can spot all the fixes…

(although i have used the 2020 Blu-Ray for this comparison, there are shots i used from the 2011 Blu-Ray, or a mixture of both)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IuT7b9MXkQmTF0Nxjpk8Wk3la9914L8f/view?usp=drive_link

Looks incredible, Ady! Great work!

roy neary said:

It looks like the font has changed on the ALI versions in that it’s regular, vs bold on the 4k77.

It’s not. It’s the exact same font. It’s just that 4K77 has brighter highlights Which gives the illusion of a different font. But it’s the same font and even fades in and out at the exact same time.

YAREL_RGP said:

oojason said:

NEW SCREENSHOT COMPARISON - AND A NEW VIDEO CLIP - FROM RETURN OF THE JEDI…

 

ALI…

 
UHD…

 
2011 blu ray…

 
4K83…

 

a streamable video clip of the above scene: https://streamable.com/q1txlq
 

I still find it strange that the VistaVision intermediate film hasn’t been scanned at 8K. I don’t know if 6K is really that good, because even though VistaVision is high quality, how comparable is it to a 65mm film to warrant scanning it at 8K?

I’m not sure why you’re mentioning Vistavision, as only a handful of shots were printed on that stock. The reason this shot is labeled as such is most likely a typo, as the last ROTJ shot (palace door matte) was a VVI, and that has been carried into the title of this new clip. Either way, according to the docs, all effects shots are, in fact, being scanned in 8K. This shot, which isn’t a VVI, was most likely scanned at 6K. At least according to the documents.

I have no clue what source you’re using, but it’s completely wrong.

Here’s the UHD with HDR simulation:

And here’s the SDR 1080p BD:

And here’s yours:

I haven’t got a clue where you’ve sourced your screencap from, but it doesn’t look like the UDH. Not even close. Please check your sources before correcting people in the future.

Little Nemo said:

I know screencaps are an imperfect science (I also think I’m a frame off) but when I try I get this:

UHD

vs. the above

…which feels like it’s had some of the blue sucked out and highlights surpressed

What source are you using for the UHD? And what HDR to SDR converter?

timdiggerm said:

That guy with no name said:

timdiggerm said:

I had missed that redacted pastebin partial. Any idea what the .WI source is? The others all make sense.

very interesting that they’ve partially re-recorded foley for the new 7.1 mix. That’s…well, maybe it’s understandable, but it’s surprising nonetheless.

VVI stands for Vista Vision Intermediate or Interpositive. This has been confirmed by the clips that have been named as such…

Ooooooh that makes so much sense. Thank you.

Yeah. For Star Wars 77 those shots would be limited to the many space or model ship shots…

timdiggerm said:

I had missed that redacted pastebin partial. Any idea what the .WI source is? The others all make sense.

very interesting that they’ve partially re-recorded foley for the new 7.1 mix. That’s…well, maybe it’s understandable, but it’s surprising nonetheless.

VVI stands for Vista Vision Intermediate or Interpositive. This has been confirmed by the clips that have been named as such…

see you auntie said:

I only found out about this leak today, for the last 10 years I’ve been on and off read-only here on ot.com and similar at the 4K77/80/83 forums. Reading between the lines, that’s where originally there was a discussion thread on the ALI leak what was made private for reasons I completely understand.

The reason I bring this up because there’s obviously 3+ months of discussion I’m not privy to but I wanted to ask if there’s a theory as to the framing/cropping ALI is using for all 3 films?

I realise it’s a WIP but looking at the comparisons provided by oojason, the framing is different from the ALI restoration and 4K77/80/83 (ignoring the UHD and Blu-ray)

In one of the documents there is mention of a published cropping standard for all three films Which is apparently being used. ROTJ seems to have the widest cropping; seeming to be even wider than the official release, though ESB and ANH are much, much more tight. From what we can tell the final cropping will most likely be different.

NewCanaanite said:

Apologies if this has been addressed , but do we have any evidence (like a screenshot) that this is a restoration of the theatrical versions (or at least something pre-19967)? Is it possible this will just be the same edit as what is on disney+?

Yes. We’ve seen original model shots, matte paintings, and even the original Sy Snootles puppet…

Fang Zei said:

timdiggerm said:

I also wonder if they won’t do a purist version (original effects) and a nicer-looking version (original but recomposited effects), with the latter being what gets released in theaters.

I would hope they leave it alone completely.

There’s no reason for a nicer-looking version when the SE exists. If we want to keep any fixes while getting rid of what we don’t like, well, that’s what places like this are for.

Historical preservation would be my priority. That’s why it kinda bothers me that they’re apparently doing a 7.1 remix with alternate takes and whatnot. If that was only being done for the latest SE I wouldn’t care, but if that’s what would be heard in a dcp of the “unaltered” version then we’re getting into revisionism territory.

They’re fully restoring both the stereo and mono mixes. And maybe the 70mm mix too. The 7.1 DTS will probably be for theatres, as there is no evidence that it will be included on home media. What we do know is that they aren’t just remixing from the stems but going back to the raw elements…

johnsmith01 said:

That guy with no name said:

johnsmith01 said:

The truth is that because of security and legal reasons the truth about this is not able to be told just yet. You only see what they want you to see.

You’re a liar. Hey! Stop lying. You don’t know anything.

I know about the slugs and only 3 people on here do including me. If you do not know about the slugs then you know little.

The what? Are you just screwing with us know?
Stop lying, stop scrounging for attention. Also by those 2 other people do you mean just YOU?

johnsmith01 said:

The truth is that because of security and legal reasons the truth about this is not able to be told just yet. You only see what they want you to see.

You’re a liar. Hey! Stop lying. You don’t know anything.