logo Sign In

stretch009

User Group
Members
Join date
30-Mar-2011
Last activity
26-Apr-2024
Posts
1,206

Post History

Post
#641325
Topic
The Hangover Trilogy
Time

This has got to be the worst movie trilogy of all time.   All three were awful and unfunny.  The only genuinely funny part in the trilogy was when Bradley Cooper sees the tiger after he wakes up in the first movie.  Zach G. has to be the most annoying unlikeable character in movie history.  None of these should have been made let alone a trilogy.   Pretty much every comedy in the last 10 years is way better than this crap.  It just boggles the mind how people raved over the first one and continue to while saying 2 and 3 aren't as good as the 'amazing' first one.

Rant over.

 

 

Post
#638307
Topic
Star Wars OT & 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

dark_jedi said:

stretch009 said:

Is there going to be V4 DVD's?  I kinda recall some talk about it many pages ago.  I'm sure the folks with only standard def options would appreciate an upgrade from the V3.

 

Maybe I will do an encode of the video and upload to Spleen and you guys can just swap out the video's.

@  Coligion

Post 3714 (Right above yours)

 

Post
#637503
Topic
Info: Back to the Future - without DNR & EE
Time

zee944 said:

stretch009 said:

For what it's worth, someone posted WOWOW part one WITHOUT hard-coded Japanese subtitles to Usenet.  The nfo explains how they removed the subs.   It's 25.73 gb's and hopefully I can trash the canal+ version I just obtained with the annoying logo.

I don't know what Usenet is and how to use it. Could you please post the content of the .nfo file here? I'm curious what they're writing.

.nfo:

Back To The Future 1985 1080p HDTV DTS 5.1 x264–CtrlHD

General Information
RUNTIME.........: 01h:55m:56s
SIZE............: 20.8GB
VIDEO CODEC.....: x264, 2pass, L4.1
FRAMERATE.......: 23.976fps
VIDEO BITRATE...: 24300
RESOLUTION......: 1920x1040p
AUDIO...........: DTS 5.1 @ 1510kbps from BD
SUBTITLES.......: English
CHAPTERS........: same as BD
SOURCE..........: Back To The Future 1985 1080 AAC5.1–WOWOW (thanks `BK)
IMDb............: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/
IMDb RATING.....: 8.4/10 215,363 votes[/pre]

This BD is the best of the 3 movies PQ wise but that isn't saying much :/
so I used the superior wowow cap that had Jap subs burnt in for every spoken
word and used another source to overlay the subs using the patented haroldnipps
method. I prefer this to the BD and so do quite a few other people on the site as
it at least resemebles film and doesn't have major EE, sharpening, and filtering.

Post Information
ENCODER.........: sub#$%#7
RELEASE DATE....: 02/02/2011


Post
#636497
Topic
Info: Back to the Future - without DNR & EE
Time

 

For what it's worth, someone posted WOWOW part one WITHOUT hard-coded Japanese subtitles to Usenet.  The nfo explains how they removed the subs.   It's 25.73 gb's and hopefully I can trash the canal+ version I just obtained with the annoying logo.

Edit:  Man I wish someone would upload part II and III in similar fashion.  Like they said in the nfo 2 and 3 are by far the worst as far as DNR goes for the BD's.

 

 

Post
#636469
Topic
The Fall of the Jedi Trilogy (Released)
Time

jimmyw247 said:

Hi

 

I'm brand new to all of this and was intrigues by the idea of Q2's tweaks. I've had trouble finding a non-malicous torrent and am now using usenet but am having trouble downloading the NBZ file - only part one of ep 1 downloads and without audio. 

Does anyone have any tips or links to a reliable site they could PM me. After watching the Phantom Edit and Attack of the Phantom I'm really intrigued to see where Fall of the Jedi goes.

Cheers

 

(WWW.)FANEDIT.INFO


Post
#635638
Topic
Info: Back to the Future - without DNR & EE
Time

zee944 said:

dvdmike said:

You don't see the janky frame rate mess when anything moves? Eeeewwwww

 You mean interlaced then, not interpolated.

Is it in a stable 3:2 pattern? Then it's just telecined and has to be played accordingly and nothing's wrong with it.

In VLC and MPC-HC it was a mess.  It looks great when I play it back in Windows Media Player though.

 

Post
#635473
Topic
Info: Back to the Future - without DNR & EE
Time

drngr said:

A guy on AVS once posted BTTF shots he claimed came from the DCP. Maybe just kidding around and posting WOWOW frames. I don't know how the compression/grain level on that compares.

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1338983/jurassic-park-trilogy/570#post_21051925

If those were WOWOW frames some of them would definitely have hard-coded Japanese subs.

 

Post
#635439
Topic
Info: Back to the Future - without DNR & EE
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

dvdmike said:

stretch009 said:

dvdmike said:

drngr said:

2 & 3 HDNet captures are now on Usenet and the bay by which buccaneers congregate (3 posted twice by mistake -- later torrent preferred but it's the same .ts).

Love the first comment.

I thought the HDnet versions were no good, low bit bate and some DNR I did get them off that place and posted here and I thought we all decided we wanted the wowow or canal +

The HDnet versions that were no good with low bit rate etc; were the highly compressed versions from rutracker.  drngr just uploaded the uncompressed source files he found to usenet and TPB.  I have both the compressed and uncompressed of Part II HDnet and the uncompressed looks WAY better than the compressed.

 

 

Interesting, they are falling off the internet as we speak 

What do you mean?

A different way of saying "I'm downloading them", I guess.