- Post
- #406291
- Topic
- STAR WARS Movies Animated
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/406291/action/topic#406291
- Time
Why can't the clones have souls? Couldn't you use it as a basis for the moral conflict a young jedi might face in deciding what is right? I thought part of the problem with the PT was that you had these huge battles of "fake" beings fighting with no real emotional attachment to any of them.
Perhaps this is borrowing too much from EU (but my knowledge of that is fairly limited in that area...), but I was thinking that the problem with clones could be that they are telepathic to a limited degree - say planet wide communication with each other but not galaxy. Lets say they're also stupider than the average sentient which makes them easier to control.
Now, Palpatine could introduce his own modified clones into the population, ones that were smarter who could influence the others to do whatever - over throw the local government, attack ships, etc. And these 'infected' clones would travel to planets, contaminate the local clones, and move on causing chaos along the way.
From the outside, this could look like an independent movement. The clones want their freedom and will do what it takes to get it. The Republic brass wants it stamped out immediately. The pacifists want to grant them more rights.
So what about the Jedi? I was thinking that they could be the only group that can pick out the modified clones (but not know that they're artificial until it's too late). So who do they side with? The clones threaten the whole galaxy so they have to be destroyed. But on the other hand they seem to be asking for the same rights as other sentient beings, perhaps there can be some sort of agreement with them? Which side Anakin falls on is debatable. Yoda and Obi-wan I think should side with the more peaceful option.
Ultimately, they have to be destroyed, because we don't see them in the OT and this could be the reason why - droids don't go crazy like the clones can.