logo Sign In

see you auntie

User Group
Members
Join date
4-May-2006
Last activity
29-Oct-2025
Posts
583

Post History

Post
#261563
Topic
my memory isn't that bad, is it? (in SW '77 - Luke misses with the grappling hook?)
Time
Yeah the evidence suggests otherwise. For the record I don't think it happened it's just that that's the way I remembered it too, like a bunch of other fans that's all. Odd misinterpreted childhood memories is all it could be, like me believing Luke accidentally shot the controls. It never happened but that's the way I remembered or interpreted the scene.

Like me having also having absolutely no recollection of the scene in which C3PO recounts the groups adventures to the ewoks. Doesn't mean it wasn't there in some obscure TV broadcast.
Post
#261477
Topic
my memory isn't that bad, is it? (in SW '77 - Luke misses with the grappling hook?)
Time
Wow that's pretty crazy stuff. I've never heard of the Wedge introduction scene.

I love the fact that you loved SW and didn't understand what was being said, very cool.

I just wanted to add that I've never read the novel, comic or any additional material, and I can't recall ever seeing a SW documentary in my youth.




Post
#261453
Topic
my memory isn't that bad, is it? (in SW '77 - Luke misses with the grappling hook?)
Time
I too have memories of Luke missing on his first throw. If I did indeed see this it wasn't in the cinema because I wasn't alive.

I did have a recorded TV broadcast on vhs that I used to watch everyday when I was like 4 years old. My first purchased copy of the SW trilogy was the '97 SE's and upon watching them for the first time it really stuck out in my mind that Luke made the throw first time around and him and Leia made the swing etc.

Whether I remembered incorrectly or this was edited for the SE I did not know, but it was soon forgetton about as I watched the SE a bunch of times and it became normal for me seeing Luke make the throw first time.

Sadly I no longer have that vhs tape of the tv broadcast. Actually, from my childhood I had two recordings of different tv broadcasts of SW. which one I am remembering or think I am remembering I don't know.

All this is probably my mind playing tricks on me, because as a kid I could have sworn that Luke shot the controls to extend the bridge by accident as he nearly runs over the edge. But we all know he does it on purpose a few moments later to stop the stormtrooper coming through the door.

I guess its safe to say kids don't get everything that happens in a movie, well at least I didn't. Though it didn't stop me from enjoying it any less.
Post
#261309
Topic
Hey guys, Remember when Star wars had writing like this?
Time
That's kind of why I ignore the PT, CO. It's hard enough to keep continuity between 3 SW films let alone 6. That and I don't particularly care for them.

And if we want to discuss lame Emperors, I think Ian's in ROTS takes the cake. He was quite good at playing the politician Palpatine, but so over the top once he became the halloween masked buffoon.

George had some 20 years to have Palpatine's visage slowly become twisted by the dark side into what appears on screen in ROTJ or ESB even, yet he decided he'd have some make up whacked on and have him gnarly and decrepit in an instant.

http://www.cybertronical.com/allsites/starwars/main/characters/darth_sidious/ds.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v68/light_sabe_r/sidious.jpg

Which do you think is a better looking newly declared Emperor?

Me thinks that what was originally planned. Look how decidedly younger ROTS Palpatine looks compared to AOTC Palpatine.

http://obix1.com/Off_Site/Palpatine-Saga.jpg

Ian looks freakin' old in AOTC with his added Mr Burns liver spots. Maybe in the the SE PT ILM can CG Ian so he doesn't look so ancient and more in keeping with his appearence in ROTS.

Pictures credited to google images.
Post
#261267
Topic
Hey guys, Remember when Star wars had writing like this?
Time
Is the ESB Emperor lame because you know it's a old women with a kick ass voice over dubbed in?

Most people don't know this and I'm sure they don't even notice anything. Clive and Ian sound different but not very.

I'm glad gomer quoted the dialogue because I've only seen that '04 scene once, that was enough.

I'll put this out there in regards to the '04 ESB. How did it them 3 years to work out that the rebel who fucked on their all powerful death star is a Skywalker?

And this from the same movie just 30 minutes earlier;



That is the system and I'm sure Skywalker is with them.........


I don't think I need to point out whose line that is.
Post
#258569
Topic
Will you buy the OOT again ?
Time
If the fully restored OOT is included in the '07 box set along with the latest SE and PT, I'll still be unsure about purchasing it.

Don't get me wrong I want the dvd's, but I don't like the idea of buying the set which includes 6 discs I don't want for 3 that I do.

If one was to download the version of the movies they want, I don't know if I could say that's a bad thing. I wouldn't do it, I haven't yet, why start now, but how many times must the fans buy these dvd's when often a lot of what you're paying for is superfluous to what you want.

Like Darth Evil said, it's Wait and See.
Post
#258564
Topic
Hey guys, Remember when Star wars had writing like this?
Time
Originally posted by: GeorgeLucasIsANarcissist "Around the survivors, a perimeter create."



Haha, you beat me to it, I was going to post that.

Originally posted by: Johnny Ringo

didn't the fx guys pretty much convince George that they could do a fully 3d yoda? I wish they'd played that down a bit. What did George have in store for us before he was swayed to use this new digital yoda...?




By 3d do you mean CG? I think George wanted a fully CG Yoda for TPM, they couldn't do it justice but they did use the CG model for the overhead shot of Yoda circling Obi Wan on bended knee at the end when he becomes knighted and granted permission to train Anakin, if memory serves me correctly.

For AOTC pre-production in one of the documentaries George is worried about being able to pull off Yoda convincingly and to the public satisfaction. He mentions, and I'm paraphrasing, that they have to be able to do it, because Yoda's fight is the climax of the film and the success of the film depends on it. Gee, what ever happened to not relying on Special Effects to tell a story?

Dammit, I'm being negative when I try not to.

Post
#257022
Topic
Where do I go from here as a SW fan?
Time
Damn, this thread exploded, that was quite a read.

My post is in regards to the coversation a few pages back.

Originally posted by: Go-Mer-TonicI thought he permanantly altered them to make the SE.


Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic

He chose to update the films to make them more like he was hoping they had turned out, and in the process, he permanantly altered the negative. Now the only negative he has is the special edition.



What. Are we going in circles? I thought that it was established and agreed upon in this thread http://www.originaltrilogy.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=2&threadid=6537&STARTPAGE=17 that there are non SE or unaltered prints of the OOT. This was only discussed in September, my memory is suspect at times but not that bad.

JediRandy, I’ve had no previous interaction with you, so sorry because I’m sure you’ve been asked this before, are/were you in support of the OOT getting a release on dvd?


Originally posted by: Vigo


If you don't like it, tough titties.... it isn't yours.

You are right. The 2004SE DVD´s aren´t mine. And for getting hard nipples, I need something stronger.


Holy crap, that gave me the chuckles.

Originally posted by: Vigo

Again, I say that the OOT release was just a marketing gag to sell the unsold SE discs, not to test market the demand for it.


Is this the case? I’m not questioning you, but I was unaware of this. I know the ‘new’ ’05 set didn’t sell well because everyone who wanted it bought it in ’04, but are you saying they salvaged the discs from these sets, repacked them and popped in the OOT and reshipped them to retailers? Does this happen, what a crappy business practice if it does?

Correct me if I’m wrong but there is another officially Star Wars con next year, celebrating the 30th anniversary, isn’t there?

I’d dearly love it for George to address the crowd. I’d be very interested to hear what he has to say to the fans that have followed SW for 30 years, and to hear what he has to say about the only movie that has been around for 30 years, not the SW film that has been around only since ’04.

I’d also love for George to do a Q & A but maybe not for the con. Maybe it would be better suited with journalists as part of promotion for the 30th anniversary to save us from the fanboy questions *speaking with a lisp* “What are the technical capabilities of the Star Destroyer Hyperdrive Engines”

From articles we’ve all read through out recent years there are obviously journalists with influence out there who love the OOT and question the revisions, I’d love them to question George over the constant updating and the many dvd releases, since that will be the big sell next year.

It does make me quite sad that what Lucasfilm started out as, a movie making house independent of the hollywood studios, now employs the practices of those studios to serve the bottom line. Hell, I’m all for George making money and don’t want to see his company go under, but the company is not what it once was.

I’m no LOTR fan. I saw them all once in the cinema and enjoyed them all for the most part, but if I was a fan the multitude of dvd releases would be very annoying. At least I’d be able to pick and choose what I want and buy them, but at the end of the day I could distinguish Peter Jackson from the studio and I wouldn’t be annoyed at Peter Jackson for constant releasing of the dvd’s. It’s not really his decision. The studio that owns the rights are the ones putting out the dvds, they know what their fan base is and how much they can milk them for it. Why is Lucasfilm doing the same thing, when Lucasfilm was established initially to be different from the studio model?


Originally posted by: Go-Mer-TonicI don't deny the business side of Lucas, I just think that his idea of good business is to make the best product he can.

I realise the non Anamorphic release isn't the best he could have done. To him the SE version was the best he could do.

Obviously not everyone thinks the new changes were for the better, and legitimately prefer the original versions. I don't think there's anything wrong with that, and I do hope that all SW fans can enjoy as much or as little of the saga as they want to, in the format they prefer.

I just also understand where Lucas is coming from.

I don't think it's about disrespecting the people who don't agree with him as much as he is respecting his own vision for it with a determined passion.

Nobody could talk him out of making SW in the first place, and a lot of people thought he was crazy to do it in the first place. Why would he suddenly come to the conclusion that his detractors are right now? I think it is a bit selfish to not give a crap about the people who prefer the originals, but I honesty don't see many of those people giving a crap about what he wants either.

I know some of you have no problem with his changes as long as the original is provided along side of it, but by and large there is a lot of crap being flung in Lucas general direction over all of this.

While I can relate to the hard feelings over his suppression of the O-OT and now his lackluster presentation of the O-OT, I think that there is a lot of disrespect given to him beyond that, putting down his artistic vision to the point where you might get the idea that SW was great despite Lucas.

I'm not pointing fingers here, but surely you have to admit there have been a lot of insults sent his way.

The worst he did was not produce the versions everyone wanted to have on DVD. You don't see him putting down all the ways we might have done it differently. He doesn't say that the people who disagree with him are not artistically competant. The way I see it, he is stubborn about his vision, but gracious about the diversity of opinions out there.


I like this post for the most part. I think you nailed it on the part were you said “some of you have no problem with his changes as long as the original is provided along side of it”

If we got the OOT is a dvd release equal to the others, it would make 99% of the fans happy. Lucas could keep on doing what he wants and if we don’t like the prequels we can ignore them too. It’s really quite simple.

Insults are insults, I don’t want to or need to explain them. You can defend Lucas against them if you want to, that’s your prerogative, but at the end of the day it’s all idle internet chatter, I don’t think it really matters nor is it really hurting anyone apart from the Lucas fans who take it to heart.

But by you saying we don’t care what Lucas wants (no we don’t care, release the kickass OOT and he can do whatever he wants, we won’t care any longer) so why should he care what we want. That’s not fair. You’re almost implying Lucas can spite us with withholding the release because we are unsympathetic to his wishes. Like I’ve said before, two wrongs don’t make a right.

Originally posted by: Obi Jeewhyen

Interestingly, I was at a screening of Star Trek Wrath of Kahn last night that featured a Q&A with the writer/director Nicolas Meyer. He said that films were like a message in a bottle ... and that despite any legal claims to the contrary, a film no longer belongs to its creator in any real or moral sense once it's put out there to the public. I gave him a hearty dose of applause for his admission, as a filmmaker, that "ownership" of art is impossible and illusory once it becomes part of the public sphere.

.


That’s pretty cool. A few musicians I like say that when they make a record it’s like a photograph of that time period or a snap shot in time. When they go out on the road things evolve and songs change a bit here and there. But they don’t denounce the record they made 2 or 10 years earlier. I’m not really trying to making a point, I think it’s just a good analogy.

Post
#255750
Topic
Star Wars: Classic Edition 2.0 NEW from Ocpmovie (Released)
Time
Woah, I wasn't aware this announcement was made in your megathread OCP, so imagine my suprise when I noticed this thread.

I'll have to dig up the quote from you that it will be a cold day in hell before you revisit the star wars edits.

Definately the best news I've heard today. I love what you've done. I'm sure this will be great.

I've noticed how good the lightsabers look in the picture samples ie training on the Falcon and the Deathstar duel. How was this acheived? You didn't de-specialise the lightsabers in the duel did you, from memory I don't think you did for version 1.0? Apologies if you answered these questions but I didn't see them in your FAQ.

And is it ok to send you an email now, or would you prefer to receive orders after the move?
Post
#255463
Topic
Classic Edition: Return of the Jedi by Ocpmovie (Released)
Time
Hey OCP

I know your not on these boards too much these days, but I was hoping you could help me in locating/downloading a copy of From Star Wars to Jedi: The Making of a Saga

I know it was included in the extras of ROTJ: Classic Edition but since that is no longer being torrented I'm out of luck on that one.

Speaking of torrents, does anyone know if there has there been any updates as to re-torrenting all 3 Classic Editions since myspleen removed them? I have SW and ESB and would be happy to seed them.
Post
#255243
Topic
Star Wars most inconsistent plot point, in my opinion: Star Wars Lethal Alliance game
Time
The reason Yoda looked different was because the original puppet had dicintigrated, and they set out to make a more emotive version of Yoda. In the end the combination of his new expressive abilities and his "more youthful" sculpt resulted in a Yoda that was a little further from what he was originally than should have been the case. That's why they are replacing this puppet Yoda with CG.


Well I think they tried to make a good Yoda for Episode I but it just didn't work out. Was it controllable? I don't know. With the original puppet being destroyed, they had to make a new one. They could have made it look just like the old one but I don't blame them for trying to make him look younger.


Originally posted by: see you auntie

But people (not me I don't care, so don't argue it with me) can argue why Yoda looks different in 10 years or whatever the argument is.




Personally, I think you missed my points completely, the above quote shows me you don't take into consideration what I say much at all.

I take into account exactly what you say and give it thought, you just seem to be at the ready to spout off some rhetoric without contemplating my point. If I can give you time and consideration in regards to what you say why not the same for me. Next time, may I suggest you take the time to read what I wrote give it time to sink in then reply.

This may not be the case but it's the way it appears to me.

Congratulations though, I am officially bored with this topic. I'm sure others will have some more to say about your arguments.

Post
#255216
Topic
Star Wars most inconsistent plot point, in my opinion: Star Wars Lethal Alliance game
Time


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
You know what, some people are calling you a troll, some just don't like your PT views on this OT board, whatever I can handle your opposing views, but those statements I quoted above are bullshit. I would lean towards calling that trying to get a rise out of posters here, care to explain?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

They are my opinions, and they may differ from the opinions of some of the other people here.

Nothing wrong with opinion.

But......

To make a comparison about a puppet looking different which I don't even care about, you claimed that Luke also looked different between movies. Fine. I've got no problem with that.

When ADM claimed Luke looked different because of his car accident, which is out of the control of all humans, Yoda had no such accident cause he's a freakin' puppet he's in the hands of the puppet people. Agreed?

I think that was a bad analogy on your part. But mistakes are made you're only human. Comparing something that was out of ones control to something that was with in ones control is a bad analogy. Agreed?


Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
Poor dude got in a motherfucking car accident and you blame him for looking different between movies. That's in poor taste and seems to me like clutching at straws to use that to support your argument.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I didn't blame him, I'm just saying TPM Yoda looked more like the Yoda we see in the rest of the movies than Luke looked like Luke from ANH as compared to ESB and ROTJ. I was just saying if we could let it slide for the classic trilogy, why couldn't most of us roll along with something like that in the prequels? Where did you get the idea I blamed Mark Hammil for being in a car accident?

We let Mark's difference in appearance slide because like I said the poor dude was in a motherfucking car accident.

And I never said you blame Mark for being in a car accident. Don't put words in my mouth. I said you blame his difference in appearance on being in a car accident. Let that slide, he could have been killed. Agreed?

Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
If you want to bring that up, how about I bring up Ewan McGregor’s difference in appearance in Episodes 1 and 2. Not between films, in them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it makes you feel better. His reshoots have been particularly obvious.

So we agree on that. That wasn't really up for debate though. As it's obvious to most.

Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
In episode 1 check out the scene before the naboo battle with Obi Wan and Qui Gon where he apologises for being out of line yadda yadda yadda. Ewan looks about 10 pounds heavier and is sporting a bad wig. Explanation. Reshoots. In episode 2 check out the scene in the elevator, the introduction of Obi Wan and Anakin. Ewan is sporting in my opinion the worst beard and wig in cinema in the last 20 years. There are little shots of these all throughout the movie, like his close-up before he gets floored by Dooku in their Lightsaber fight. Explanation. Reshoots. Please don't make me have to dust off my dvds to provide screencaps, please.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's okay, I dispute none of it. I was just saying I thought it was hypocritical to blast the prequels for things that were just as true about the classic trilogy.


Agreed. But we can't blame Mark for his change in appearance. Shit happens in life. But people (not me I don't care, so don't argue it with me) can argue why Yoda looks different in 10 years or whatever the argument is.

Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie It's hardly Lucas' fault what happens to his actors between filmimg, so if you want to bring up Mark's appearance I can counteract with Ewan's.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for helping to prove my point that the classic trilogy had the same problems


I'm not proving anyone's point I'm stating my opinion. But see above. Yoda's appearance is controllable, Mark's is not. Bad analogy.

Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
At least Lucas could of made sure Ewan got better wigs. If they can provide Liam with a decent wig and fake beard why not extend the same service for Ewan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it's harder to do short hair wigs and make them look good.


That's a definite statement. Is that the expert opinion of a wigmaker?

Ewan had a fake long haired wig in Episode 2 and beard same as Liam in Episode 1. I don't think I need to you to answer which looks remarkably better.

Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: see you auntie
If you want to retract the above statements I'll accept that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, I stand by my comments but do distance myself from your assumption that I was blaming Mark Hammil for being in an accident.


Again I never said you blamed Mark but you do blame his change in appearance because of the accident. I don't care if he looks different, which he does, because he has my sympathy, he could of died.

The whole reason for my post was that I thought bringing up Mark's accident to prove a point was in poor taste. Now if you retract that I'll accept it.
Post
#255190
Topic
Star Wars most inconsistent plot point, in my opinion: Star Wars Lethal Alliance game
Time
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic Mark Hammil looked entirely different in ESB and ROTJ than he did in ANH. That's on par with Yoda's appearance change.



Originally posted by: ADigitalMan Mark Hamill was in a car accident before ESB filmed.

They even worked it into the plot by having the Wampa maul his face.

No such excuse with Yoda.


Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic 1) Luke looks different before the wampa attack.

2) TPM Yoda will be fixed in the 2007 boxset.

3) I googled those pictures and did not photoshop them.

4) If I was trolling I would have used a picture of Luke from the Holiday Special.



You know what, some people are calling you a troll, some just don't like your PT views on this OT board, whatever I can handle your opposing views, but those statements I quoted above are bullshit.

I would lean towards calling that trying to get a rise out of posters here, care to explain?

Poor dude got in a motherfucking car accident and you blame him for looking different between movies. That's in poor taste and seems to me like clutching at straws to use that to support your argument.

If you want to bring that up, how about I bring up Ewan McGregor’s difference in appearance in Episodes 1 and 2. Not between films, in them.

In episode 1 check out the scene before the naboo battle with Obi Wan and Qui Gon where he apologises for being out of line yadda yadda yadda. Ewan looks about 10 pounds heavier and is sporting a bad wig. Explanation. Reshoots.

In episode 2 check out the scene in the elevator, the introduction of Obi Wan and Anakin. Ewan is sporting in my opinion the worst beard and wig in cinema in the last 20 years. There are little shots of these all throughout the movie, like his close-up before he gets floored by Dooku in their Lightsaber fight. Explanation. Reshoots.

Please don't make me have to dust off my dvds to provide screencaps, please.

Again, these aren't between films, these differences are in the same films.

It's hardly Lucas' fault what happens to his actors between filmimg, so if you want to bring up Mark's appearance I can counteract with Ewan's.

At least Lucas could of made sure Ewan got better wigs. If they can provide Liam with a decent wig and fake beard why not extend the same service for Ewan.

If you want to retract the above statements I'll accept that.