logo Sign In

rockin

User Group
Members
Join date
14-Oct-2008
Last activity
19-Jul-2024
Posts
565

Post History

Post
#645729
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Darth Stewie said:

brimforge said:

Adywan could snuggle some Pit Droids into Jabba's Palace ;-)

Maybe while they're 'snuggling' they could get really romantic and put on a DVD of 'The Notebook'. 

Hey! That film is awesome! It pulls at the heart strings in so many ways... I will never forget.

Post
#639513
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

adywan said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

As long as it isn't adding an extra shot of Vader looking down at luke falling and going "Noooooooooooooooo!".

Hmm, now you have given me an idea.........

 

;)

It would be funny to see this if there was a new promotional trailer for ESB Revisited later in the year. People are really enjoying the trailer then bam! Vader looking at luke falling and going "Noooooooooo!". It would be a nice way to do some Lucas trollin'. ;-)

Post
#639212
Topic
Info: True Lies - Archival Project???
Time

drngr said:

The rest of what you said was utterly meaningless. We aren't comparing two files from different sources, we are comparing one source and the transcode of that source. There is no way to make a transcode more transparent than the file it's coming from.

As already said, two different sources dude. Which is why I was comparing the detail I could see in one of them.

Post
#639109
Topic
Info: True Lies - Archival Project???
Time

drngr said:

rockin said:

drngr said:

Why are we doing detail comparisons on an "HDTVRip 1080p"? The original file is a 15GB 1080i.

That means absolutely nothing.

Sigh.

15GB 1080i vs 15GB 1080i -> unknown size HDTVRip 1080p

Gee, which is going to look better? The source or the one that is squished down from it?

Well done in taking my words out of context, and simply ignoring the rest of what I said.

Post
#638968
Topic
Info: True Lies - Archival Project???
Time

drngr said:

Why are we doing detail comparisons on an "HDTVRip 1080p"? The original file is a 15GB 1080i.

That means absolutely nothing. If the original file has less detail and more smearing than say a 10GB file that had no smearing and more detail, would you use the bigger file because it was "bigger"? It really depends on the source and how good it is, than just how big the file is.

I have no idea on the size of the files, but that d-theater one looks better to my eyes as I can see more detail, that's all I was sayin'. :-)

Post
#637632
Topic
Info: Films re-color timed on video releases
Time

dvdmike said:

woodsyallen said:

Surprised no one has mentioned the atrocity that was The French Connection when first released to BD. Thankfully that was rectified on a later edition.

Did Fincher supervise the colour timing of Seven/Fight Club for BD? I know the Seven DVD was carefully re-timed but I thought it was under Fincher's supervision (after all he is quite the notorious perfectionist).

Finally, The Godfather series was re-timed for the Coppola restoration. But apparently none of us saw how it was supposed to look, at least on home video since every previous home video release was mastered from terrible prints.

Fincher supervised them, but they are digital recreations of the chemical effect, and while they are the best the films have looked at home they are not 100% accurate.

Se7en actually looked closer on the Criterion LD as they used a silver retention print for the scan, but obviously the colour space and resolution are way off.

The new remastered Se7en in blu-ray looks closer to the Criterion LD and DVD. The first blu-ray edition had framing problems and the colours weren't quite right either from memory.

Post
#637447
Topic
Ghostbusters - Criterion PCM Track (see Jonno's post; plus lots more info) (Released)
Time

This confirms exactly what I was talking about.

From what I can see from the screenshot comparison, that is pretty much what I saw when it was re-released at the cinema. I guess, they were using the digital re-release to test the waters for the new 4K remaster.

I am so happy this has happened, as it looked exactly spot on when I saw it at the cinema. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the contrast was fixed on the big screen. Hopefully others will feel the same with the new 4K blu-ray :-)