red5-626

I was wondering what is the actual resolution of a 4:3 videos at 1080p?
For example the Wizard of Oz(1939) has the Aspect Ratio:1.37 :1 like a 4:3 TV.
But there is a blu ray that claims to be 1080P, but if you put it on a 16:9 1080P TV
You will have side bars, and will lose some of the resolution.
So what is the resolution of 4:3 at 1080p with side bars?

Than maybe getting the PS3 as a Blu ray player is not a good idea?

And I should get a standalone Blu ray player and than in several years the PS3 will get cheep and game stop will have $5 PS3 game like they have $5 PS2 game now? And I will only need PS3 for games.

I don’t care if the games are not new to the world

Just so its new to me. :)

red5-626 said:

negative1 said:

 

 

data, and the size of it is around 6-8 T.

 so What is the size of 1 real?

What I meant was how many GB / TB is 1 real

Of the the raw.

Thanks for all the info.

When I got my LG 32” LCD, I picked it because it had the zoom and stretch mode needed fore the GOUT. + it had the component and composite inputs needed for my old games.

I had thought of getting a PS3 although that is still not cheep.

Also I am a little worried about the way you slide the disk in like a car CD player, instead of the tray that comes out like a drawer.

Why did they have to do it like that?

Thanks for the info.

Bantha Poodoo ?

negative1 said:

 

 

data, and the size of it is around 6-8 T.

 so What is the size of 1 real?

I am thinking of finally buying a Blu ray player.
But I am not shore witch Brand to get.
All I No is that I want to be shore that
it has really good DVD Up scaling / up conversion. I have
Too many DVDs to buy all my movies again on Blu ray.
 And even with an unlimited money half of my collection is
 not likely to ever get put on Blu ray.

I am currently using a Toshiba XDE DVD player.
So I was thinking of getting a Toshiba Blu ray player
I also thought LG may be good as I have an LG LCD TV.
What do people like here?

Yes I will probably be getting the SD DVD

Actually the BD would not be any good to me now as

I have nothing to play it on. But I am thinking of the Future.

Mainly trying to get an idea of what is possible.
And NO I do not have a bluray burner.
And no I can't download it all at once. .
Just Downloading 1 of Harmy's SD DVD’s was a challenge.

Which  is why I like physical media.
I could go to a store and buy 5 blu rays   faster than I can download one SD video.

Now HOW IS THAT CONVENIENT ?

negative1 said:

we are going with the following for our project:

1) full frame MKV 1920x1080 file that can fit on a 25G bluray disc

  (for those with digital projectors)

2) 1080p bluray compatible files / letterboxed - 25G files

3) DVD-9 files for DVD-DL - 9G (maybe a DVD-5)

4) MP4/avi files - 2-5 G

there will be no large scale physical disk distribution,

except for the private workprints, and the initial seeding.

 

all of it will be usenet, torrent, and lastly file locker shared.

 

we will have a few minimal menus, that's it,

with a few soundtrack choices also. we are using commercial

consumer software for the final product. no custom settings,

except to max out the video bitrate, and fit 3 soundtracks

on the discs.

 

later

-1 

 So the largest file would be a 25G bluray disc?

Just wandering if you broke the movie up into reels,

could you put each reel on 1

Standard 1 Layer DVD?

And have 6 reels, on 6 discs

WOW I feel a bit like Lumpy

watching the Boba Fett cartoon.

I just hope the storm troopers don’t come in the room.

Found this video.
Is the machine any thing like this .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFFzF_d1Sd4&feature=related

see 4:26

Harmy said:

Who knows, maybe in time I'll get a new computer and some better sources than GOUT will surface (and they just might) and I'll do a v3 in 1080p.

Anyway, I figured out a way to make the crawl look better but it involves a lot of work, including redoing the crawl in 4K, rendering at 4K and then resizing in photoshop in at least three steps, so I may have to postpone the rendering to tomorrow.

 Well when -1 is finished maybe you can do the partially Respecialized Edition.

Using mostly -1 but cleaning it up with blu ray.

msycamore said:

IMO Harmy's recreation fall somewhere in the fan-edit territory, as it contains After Effects compositing done by Harmy and leave some SE compositing in there, technically a new version of the film takes shape. I applaud his efforts and know that calling it a fan-edit is downplaying his work and intent, but I also feel that it's important that we draw the lines correctly of what is original and what is not.

 I think the best way to describe Harmy's is a reconstruction of the Original.

I do not know what to say about a Yoda movie.

Maybe if you included the line that I was disappointed not to here in

EP3 and am still hoping to here in Clone Wars.

negative1 said:

half the time i'm watching it on screens or projected,

it 'feels' like film.. because of the gate weave, dust, dirt,

scratches etc, that are still currently there.

 

later

-1

 You mentioned gate weave.

Is that do to the scanning or is that how it was filmed?

I know that the GOUT had rely bad gate weave that made me seasick.

timdiggerm said:

lurker77 said:

Second, film has infinite resolution.

Oh really?

Information on film goes down to the atomic level.

Oh, so not really. Cool.

 I thought that a 4k scan was just over what a 35mm film frame had on it?

Maybe you need 5or 6 k for 70mm?

Brooks said:

Many Bothans died to bring us this restoration...

 LOL

That should be on a tidal card just before the FOX logo.

Now I am with you there.

rabscuttle1 said:

 It doesn't offend me that some people don't like some of star wars - what offends me is the way some people express their dislike.  

Are you offended buy this, or is it ok?

Wolfman said:

SilverWook said:

lpd said:

I reckon this sums up how a lot of us feel on here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJlbPXZEpRE&feature=player_embedded#!

Wow! That ought to be our theme song!

 That is awesome. Everything in the lyrics is true.

These lines by George stood out for me...

"But Star Wars will be done my way
I don’t care what you have to say
I think that they should let it go
And they’ll never get the Blu-Ray of the Star Wars that you used to know"..

 

 Lego The Star Wars That I Used To Know Parody

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUbkB9tPlX8&feature=related

GL needs to see that.

retartedted said:

Not sure why you are looking for tapes without Macrovision.  It is very very easy to copy tapes with it.

My current setup can do it, and I imagine most other people around here could do the same.  Especially if you have a capture card of some type installed on your computer or something like an Canopus ADVC110.  

Macrovision essentially used trickery to make older recorders THINK there was a problem with the signal, thus you would just get a bunch of tearing and chroma goofyness.  Any modern recording method (like the ones I mentioned above) pretty much just ignore the trickery from Macrovision.

 I am trying to get an idea of what I first saw Star Wars on.
I am almost shore it was a copy of a rental. At the time the
only way I would have gotten it was to have a tape without Macrovision.

Well I do not think that what they are doing on Jaws

Is a bad thing. It looks more like what should have been dun for the SW SE.

Well my Dad had a ANH & ESB & ROTJ, copy from rental.
Amazing that ROTJ would be available before 1984 it came
out in 1983 right.
Although ROTJ was missing the ending, it cut off after burning Vader.
Some years after we got a rely copy and I saw Yub Nub.
Than 1997 they cut out the Yub Nub Song! Noooooooooooooooo!