I do wonder if Luke will have the same lightsabre in TFA...
He tosses it away after his battle with Vader, but has it on his belt again during the teddy bear picnic...
I guess he'll have the same one.
Hey now... Don't switch the blade on the guy in shades, Oh no.
That's a great list of goofy names up there.
I still don't know where we are wanting these Jedis to return to...
^Yeah, I'm looking forward to that too.
"Very interesting..." : )
I really love seeing Legacy compared to the the GOUT, Bluray and now the Reliance versions. Really helps to drive home to the uninitiated why a proper restoration is so important and just how bad the official releases really are.
Warbler said:
Besides, this is your bar; I am merely passing through...
Its not my bar, it belongs to Jay. This place for me is kind of like what the Cheers bar is for Norm.
Seeing as you only post in Off-Topic, that's like saying all Norm ever did at Cheers was pop in to use the restroom and leave.
I don't mean to be insulting or anything, but there is much more to this forum than Off-Topic and it seems strange that one who contributes to the entire forum (like Norm at Cheers) is being chased away by someone who uses such a small part of the site (like the restroom analogy).
It seems to me that there is enough room for us all here and if someone disagrees, then that person should be the one to go.
Yeah, me too.
Still, maybe we can get him to see that most of us want him around.
Or am I wrong about that?
This place hasn't gotten that lame, has it?
Signed.
DuracellEnergizer said:
I bought my first Blu-ray today -- The Evil Dead (1981).
This particular release didn't come with any bonus features, unfortunately, but it only cost $9.99 (not including taxes), so I'm not complaining.
It's a nice looking transfer.
Also undoes some of the SE shit from the DVDs (digital zoom on Cheryl and the shot of the lightning striking the tree was cut out), but also introduces some new SE shit (visible crew members painted out).
Does the version you have feature the original 1.33:1 ratio or the horribly cropped 1.85:1?
Or both?!
Possessed said:
I would be wary of disclosing any mental illnesses you might have on this (or any) forum. Not going to name names, but I can clearly picture certain members, if you post anything they don't like, responding with things like "This coming from somebody with _______", and that would get really irritating.
I was gonna say that I don't think we have anyone around here who would act like that. But then as the reply page was loading, I thought of one who might.
Still, especially compared to most parts of the interwebs, we seem to have a community of decent folks.
"...Mostly."
Every time someone bumps a thread that has a post from Bingo on the page, I'm happy momentarily because I think he's posting in Off Topic again...
But then I look at the date the post was made...
Then, sadness.
Bingowings said:
Out of all the Jedi characters which ones would you like to see come back?
Come back to where?
I really don't know what we're discussing.
slask said:
And I replied a hundred times with a simple explanation:
the Force CANNOT guess how a 43 year old Anakin would have looked without burns and wounds.
Why? Who says? How come? What's stopping it?
His head was hardly even burned!
Or, why couldn't he still have his scars? Obi-Wan and Yoda still have the effects of old age, why does Anakin have to show up looking perfect when he's the only one of the three to have to be redeemed from his horrible deeds?
This is classic GL apologist BS.
Yeah, I can't even make it one day without being forced to watch Kevin Smith fans reenact his films.
Oh, wait... Never mind. That's never happened to anybody...
I know what ya mean though. Like you said, everybody has some film/tv series, musical artist, ect. that they wish would stop doing what they do.
But I usually find it easy to just ignore things I'm not a fan of.
So what? He doesn't go to your homes and force his films on you.
Why should something cease to exist just because it's not your brand of humor or you think the creator is smug?
Revisited does that, doesn't it?
TV's Frink said:
Sorry, what I stated regarding Ghostbusters and the sequel is verifiable fact.
I've looked into your theories and have done a large amount of research myself and It all checks out-
Ghostbusters 2 was a disappointing piece of crap in 1989 and it smells even worse now.
adywan said:
ray_afraid said:
That's cool.
Any word on fixing the AT-AT/speeder distance problem or not?I tweaked that shot ages ago by making the existing AT-AT larger.
Nice!
ATMachine said:
Bingowings said:
Ooh, that's a really dangerous spoiler: Daisy Ridley is going to be in the movie!
No, no. You missed the big spoiler...
HANS OLO will be in the movie!!!!
TV's Frink said:
ray_afraid said:
Louis C.K. on "the N-word" and others...
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/If-you-need-to-B-tch-about-something-this-is-the-place/post/758792/#TopicPost758792
What, I'm supposed to click every mysterious, unlabeled link around here?
Louis C.K. on "the N-word" and others...
^Green screens and data files.
It would be a shitty move, but if they steal Mike Verta's Legacy Edition, at least we will know we're getting a proper restoration.
Really though, they just just pay him for it when he's finished and give him proper credit.
Hey, I was just listening to an old episode of the Kaijucast (a podcast dedicated to Godzilla and all of his rubber suited foes) and after playing a wonderful piece of music I'd never heard, host Kyle informs "that was the main title to the new Ultraman film, by MIKE VERTA!"
Very cool!
CHAPPiE's design is just a knock-off of Canti from FLCL.
That's cool.
Any word on fixing the AT-AT/speeder distance problem or not?
Asaki said:
But of course, Disney couldn't stand to be upstaged by a scruffy-looking nerf herder.
Have you not seen his avatar pic under the vids?
"Who's scruffy-lookin'?"
; )
