pittrek

Jetrell Fo said:

pittrek said:

Is there a chance you would "spleen" the captures please? Pretty please?

This is a better example of how it should have sounded.

:) 

 Well in my case it's not a question of money, but a combination of living in an incorrect country, having a crappy internet provider (they "protect" me from going where or doing what I want) and not knowing how usenet works. That's why I prefer torrents. Or PIFs (if that's the right term)

Is there a chance you would "spleen" the captures please? Pretty please?

The official trailer to Star Trek Renegades : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjeX5drV9ms

Did anybody try it? I’m watching the MCU movies in chronological order these days and I noticed the Blurays have lots of deleted scenes for each film. GOOD deleted scenes I might add. Scenes, which actually improve the story.

Did anybody try to edit these scenes back into the movies?

krloz said:

What I'm really curious about is wether they will release the deleted scenes that were only on the DVD in HD. Those would be useful for fanediting since they always stick out as SD on an HD fanedit.

 Why would they do that? They upscaled the "new" scenes from 480i to 1080p in episode 1 and they look like shit. When they didn't re-do the scenes for the movie, I don't think they'll do it for some online bonus features.

I still don't understand who is this released meant for - the people who don't know how to rip their 2011 set? I see nothing in the press release what wouldn't be on the 2011 Bluray set

What the hell is "digital HD"? Is there an "analogue HD"? Also it misses the only interesting information - which cuts will it contain

Of course the movies are getting worse with every new release. Instead of fixing old errors they create new continuity errors, they f**k up the colours, they f**k up the sound mix...

Interesting. It's sad about Hulk, I think the 2003 movie is much better than the 2008 movie, the comic book style editing and transitions are pretty bad but at least it's not boring.

It's an interesting idea putting the first Captain America (and Agent Carter) to the beginning, the "other" story of it takes place between Thor and Avengers, and the "main" story is basically just a flashback, so I wouldn't personally put it to the beginning, but the rest seems similar to what I thought. I guess it hasn't been announced yet when will the Daredevil series take place?

Can somebody help a guy who wants to watch the whole MCU stuff as an intro to Avengers 2?

I guess it's something like ...

Ang Lee Hulk - is it a part of the MCU or a separate movie? TIH seems to work perfectly as a sequel to Hulk 2003.

Iron Man

The Incredible Hulk

Iron Man 2

A Funny Thing Happened on the way to Thor's Hammer - it's definitely sometimes before Thor, but when?

The Consultant - when does this take place? After TIH or after one of the Iron Man movies?

Thor

Captain America - The First Avenger

Agent Carter - 8 episodes

Agent Carter - One shot

Avengers

Item 47

Iron Man 3

All Hail The King

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes 1-7

Thor - The Dark World

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes 8-15 or 16

Captain America - The Winter Soldier

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. - the rest of season 1

Guardians of the Galaxy

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. - season 2

Is that all? I've read that Phil Coulson is in some of the animated cartoons, are they also part of the MCU or something different?

The facebook link doesn't work anymore. What was there if I may ask?

The funny thing is that old Lucas sold his company to Disney - a company that represents everything that young Lucas hated and rebelled against.

But also young Lucas tried to release good movies. Old Lucas tried to release profitable products.

Am I the only one who sees absolutely NO differences in any of the pictures posted in this thread?

Why did he leave?

What are the 2011 Blurays?

Something like : Original negatives -> 1995 scan -> SE digital version -> 1997 SE prints -> 1080p scan with colour "correction" -> Lowry "restoration" -> 1080p DVD master -> more stupid digital changes -> 2011 Bluray master

So yes, the BDs are done from an early century 1080p scans of SE masters, but no, they didn't do it because "original negatives are nowhere to be found" but simply because GL for some reason considered the old horrible looking scans to be "good enough" and didn't want to spend money for doing it correctly.

Even if the rumours that the original negatives were modified to contain 1997 SE material (which I doubt, I simply refuse to believe they were THAT stupid), they still have finished prints of the original theatrical editions (including some Technicolor prints if I remember correctly). Even scanning these prints would be "good enough" for most of us

I'd love to see a video

I hated the first episodes. I absolutely loved the last episodes.

The beginning of the show is very "childish", very "Disney". But after a few episodes, which are serving only one purpose - introducing the characters, the REAL story starts :)

Does anybody have the link to the interview where Bob Iger almost admits that they're working on a OOT release? When the reporter asks him about it he freezes for a second with the "how the hell do you know about that?" look on his face, then he smiles and says something like "we're thinking the same way"

Hans solo is back? Great. I hope he will shoot Gringo first again.

Wow. That's simply beautiful

Don't forget the reediting, that's the main problem

TV's Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

skyjedi2005 said:

Does anyone else feel that the next Star Trek will be the last with the current cast. 

I get a sense some of the actors may want to move on.

*crosses finger that this'll happen and lead to a reboot, a reboot that won't be Trek in name only this time around*

 But the cast is good.

 Really? I like Karl Urban (or what's his name) as McCoy, and Simon Pegg as Scotty, but the rest are IMHO horribly, HORRIBLY misscast.

SilverWook said:

I wonder if he knows what happened to the TMP files?

I used to chat on IRC with a Foundation employee many years ago. (I can't recall their "real" name now.) They did share personal photos of when the TMP Enterprise miniature was uncrated for the animators to study. The poor gal was not only dirty and dusty, there were bug droppings!

I blame the Klingons. ;)

 Isn't Darth Mojo still posting here ? He should know what happened to the TMP files

SilverWook said:

ATMachine said:

I hope that's true. I myself recall hearing that Digital Domain (the studio that did CGI for DS9, Voyager, and Insurrection) trashed all its old rendering files when the studio went through bankruptcy.

I'd much rather prefer that you be right and I wrong on this.

 The version I've heard is an employee kept backups of the files. Where the truth lies is anyone's guess.

 Robert Bonchune from Foundation Imaging said in an interview he has ALL the digital files from DS9 and MOST of the digital files from Voyager, but he has no idea what happened to the stuff done by Digital Muse / Eden FX.

doubleofive said:

Robert Myer Burnett has pretty much said that CBS isn't very willing to do it because not enough people bought TNG-R. They also didn't do anything to promote it recently and priced the sets way out of most people's price range.

 From what I've read they planned to pay for the DS9 transfer from the profit they get from TNG, but unfortunately the profit was too small.