- Post
- #1066276
- Topic
- Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1066276/action/topic#1066276
- Time
^ đ
Â


^ đ
Â





Maybe heâs someone we should tweet at when we do the open letter thing?
Good idea.
And has anyone here got the mad skills to repurpose the Rogue One trailer so that it depicts a rag-tag team of rebels trying to steal the Original Theatrical cut from the Evil Empire? That might go viral! đ
Thatâs a cracker of an idea, Darth đ
Star Wars: Celebration 2017 - 10 Things We Learned From Doug Chiangâs Rogue One Panel:-
http://www.starwars.com/news/swco-2017-10-things-we-learned-from-doug-chiangs-rogue-one-panel
Mark Hamillâs Tribute to Carrie Fisher Panel - FULL - Star Wars Celebration 2017:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6yaOp1mYdw (53m)
Â
Day 1 Celebration 2017 Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqY1Zo5QTcM (5h 45m)
Day 2 Celebration 2017 Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgxO6mQI9k0 (6h 44m)
Day 3 Celebration 2017 Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPvrArQPbjU (10h 12m)
Day 4 Celebration 2017 Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfRx3l2uHJM (5h 54m)
Â
40 Years of Star Wars Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI5QodTtlME (1h 31m)
The Last Jedi Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4X4N-8fEM (1h 06m)
Rebels Season 4 Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPm-X5M-DrA (50m)
Â
Hamill Himself Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foCzcHWUf-8 (54m)
Championships of Cosplay Contest - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWHN3q93Gs (1h 3m)
These Are the Droids Youâre Looking For Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1MhfUp97GY (47m)
Ian McDiarmid interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58xjtNARA4E (7m)
Denis Lawson (Wedge) interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MzDOCN8ZYU (9m)
Felicity Jones (Jyn) and Forest Whitaker (Saw) interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDDzHbhRgGQ (7m)
The Heroines of Star Wars Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv0vzRbNUvk (48m)
Closing Ceremony Full Panel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjYXvv4_zE (43m)
Lots of videos from the various Panels - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYtStMnqPtT86BWQA11ywKA/videos
Â
Live Stream for Celebration 2017 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPvrArQPbjU & http://www.starwars.com/


Napolitano wrote on March 16: âSources have told me that the British foreign surveillance service, the Government Communications Headquarters, known as GCHQ, most likely provided Obama with transcripts of Trumpâs calls.â
Notice he uses the words âmost likelyâ. That is not him saying âit was absolutelyâ what happened. If anyone here thinks for one second that there is absolutely NO possibility beyond a doubt, that this couldnât happen between close allies, youâd be kidding yourself. I never said it happened this way either but I do believe that the possibility that it did is far more likely.
There is no way allies would tell the world they committed a âtreaty violationâ to help out another nation. They would not want anyone to be considering such a thing that is why they wouldnât want someone saying it publicly ⌠it would put them in a spot they were trying to stay out of by being quite about it.
âJetrell Fo said:
Why did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?â
Then there is nothing to own up to then at all, no? Despite your words clearly claiming âbut now they have own up to itâ)âŚ
anyone figured what the whispers are in the trailer - if you listen carefully you can hear these whispers - but I canât make them outâŚ
âBritish spies were first to spot Trump teamâs links with Russiaâ:-
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
&
GCHQ âtold US security services about meetings between Donald Trumpâs team and Russiaâ:-
&
âEx-MI6 chief says Donald Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to keep his empire afloatâ:-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-mi6-chief-says-donald-10217616
Why did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?
Sorry mate - could you be a little more specific on what they denied - and what they are now âowning up toâ?
That British Intelligence apparently gave the U.S. Intel they gained from surveillance of Trump Staff/Russia ties. Sorry that wasnât clear. This information was clearly available weeks ago here in the States and some people got tossed under the bus for even insinuating that British Intelligence had or shared any such Intel with the U.S⌠Now theyâve owned up to it after the fact.
Ah, right - I get you.
I thought the accusations from weeks ago were of British Intelligenece spying on Trump/ Trump Towers on behalf of the American Security Services? Whereas the news linked by me is of the British giving a heads-up to their US counterparts after trailing/spying on Russian counterparts and possible Russian agents - going back some time - and as to a pattern emerging over meetings with Trumpâs people (along with article that has the ex-MI6 Chief thinking that Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to help keep his empire afloat around the time of the financial crisis in 2008(-ish)).
I think they are two very different things - and the British Services were correct in denying that were spying on Trump/Trump Towers on behalf of the US Services.
The US and Brits, along with other allies often keep each other abreast of information and goings on (though likely keep the really interesting stuff from each other đ)
Personally, I would not doubt the possibility of the U.K. doing the footwork for the U.S. overseas like this. Admitting it would be a far different matter of course.
Itâs a possibility - though quite unlikely given the size of the UK security services these days - due to the cuts they have suffered over the past few years. Itâs more likely weâd be getting more of our info â2nd handâ from the US and our other allies than before - and concentrating our resources more on anti-terror (Middle East & North Africa) and the Russians.
I doubt we even spy on the US and other allies much these daysâŚ
Anyway, the rare.us article is stretching at best - and ignores the fact that it was the UK spying on the Russians that incidentally came up with a pattern of meetings by Trumpâs people with those Russians - to which the US Security Services (along with our other European allies) was tipped off about. There is no proof in that story of anything apart from some very loose conjecture to try and give some semblance of credence (in the form of a question in the editorial title) to what Judge Andrew Napolitano mistakenly stated and inferred âfrom his sourceâ that we were spying on Trump (for ourselves or for the US).
If this is all weâre talking about, GCHQ denied what Judge Napolitano said simply because it was flat-out wrong. Not only wrong, but so outrageously wrong it would have been a treaty violation if true, which is why there was the raft of apologies afterwards. It wasnât merely a matter of some talking head making shit upâit was a diplomatic incident. Iâm sad to see some people (rare.us) insist on pursuing the imaginary storyline even now that the evidence proving it false is out there for everyone to see.
I completely agree - which is why I was a little confused to Foâs âWhy did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?â when that hasnât actually happened (and there is nothing to âown up toâ) - and certainly not from the 3 news links I posted.
this is the live stream for Celebration 2017 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgxO6mQI9k0
hopefully itâll show âThe Making of Rogue One: A Star Wars Storyâ which starts at 1.30pm ET time
Â
Â
The Rogue One video channel from the Star Wars Youtube Page (currently 28 videos - though more Rogue One related videos are in other categories, ie âGo Rogueâ and âMovie Trailersâ etc):-
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL148kCvXk8pDWYE9q9cNdux5JFmu80kN8
https://www.youtube.com/user/starwars/playlists
Â
In case anyone missed itâŚ
Star Wars: The Last Jedi Panel | Star Wars Celebration Orlando 2017 video⌠(forward to 10mins 20secs in for the start)
The Last Jedi teaser trailerâŚ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB4I68XVPzQ
Â
The Last Jedi posterâŚ

Â
In case anyone missed itâŚ
Star Wars: The Last Jedi Panel | Star Wars Celebration Orlando 2017 video⌠(forward to 10mins 20secs in for the start)
Here we goâŚ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4X4N-8fEM
^ cool posterâŚ
Â
The Last Jedi trailer itselfâŚ
^ a couple more scenesâŚ
Grand Moff Tarkin (Peter Cushing) RARE Outtake - Star Wars Celebration 2017: Archival Footage (1977):-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xIBdWBou7w
&
âAnd You Call Yourselves Humanâ - Star Wars Celebration 2017: RARE Extended Archival Footage:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I7jAwuocMw
&
Gold Leader Drops an F-Bomb! - Star Wars Celebration 2017: RARE Archival Footage:-
âBritish spies were first to spot Trump teamâs links with Russiaâ:-
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
&
GCHQ âtold US security services about meetings between Donald Trumpâs team and Russiaâ:-
&
âEx-MI6 chief says Donald Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to keep his empire afloatâ:-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-mi6-chief-says-donald-10217616
Why did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?
Sorry mate - could you be a little more specific on what they denied - and what they are now âowning up toâ?
That British Intelligence apparently gave the U.S. Intel they gained from surveillance of Trump Staff/Russia ties. Sorry that wasnât clear. This information was clearly available weeks ago here in the States and some people got tossed under the bus for even insinuating that British Intelligence had or shared any such Intel with the U.S⌠Now theyâve owned up to it after the fact.
Ah, right - I get you.
I thought the accusations from weeks ago were of British Intelligenece spying on Trump/ Trump Towers on behalf of the American Security Services? Whereas the news linked by me is of the British giving a heads-up to their US counterparts after trailing/spying on Russian counterparts and possible Russian agents - going back some time - and as to a pattern emerging over meetings with Trumpâs people (along with article that has the ex-MI6 Chief thinking that Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to help keep his empire afloat around the time of the financial crisis in 2008(-ish)).
I think they are two very different things - and the British Services were correct in denying that were spying on Trump/Trump Towers on behalf of the US Services.
The US and Brits, along with other allies often keep each other abreast of information and goings on (though likely keep the really interesting stuff from each other đ)
Personally, I would not doubt the possibility of the U.K. doing the footwork for the U.S. overseas like this. Admitting it would be a far different matter of course.
Itâs a possibility - though quite unlikely given the size of the UK security services these days - due to the cuts they have suffered over the past few years. Itâs more likely weâd be getting more of our info â2nd handâ from the US and our other allies than before - and concentrating our resources more on anti-terror (Middle East & North Africa) and the Russians.
I doubt we even spy on the US and other allies much these daysâŚ
Anyway, the rare.us article is stretching at best - and ignores the fact that it was the UK spying on the Russians that incidentally came up with a pattern of meetings by Trumpâs people with those Russians - to which the US Security Services (along with our other European allies) was tipped off about. There is no proof in that story of anything apart from some very loose conjecture to try and give some semblance of credence (in the form of a question in the editorial title) to what Judge Andrew Napolitano mistakenly stated and inferred âfrom his sourceâ that we were spying on Trump (for ourselves or for the US).
40 Years of Star Wars Panel - Full Video - Star Wars Celebration 2017 Orlando (from Thursday):-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTqmkkw22vs
^ no buffering, freezing or stopping this time đ
apologies if posted beforeâŚ
Extended Death Star Meeting Scene - Star Wars Celebration 2017: RARE Archival Footage:-
âBritish spies were first to spot Trump teamâs links with Russiaâ:-
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
&
GCHQ âtold US security services about meetings between Donald Trumpâs team and Russiaâ:-
&
âEx-MI6 chief says Donald Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to keep his empire afloatâ:-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-mi6-chief-says-donald-10217616
Why did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?
Sorry mate - could you be a little more specific on what they denied - and what they are now âowning up toâ?
That British Intelligence apparently gave the U.S. Intel they gained from surveillance of Trump Staff/Russia ties. Sorry that wasnât clear. This information was clearly available weeks ago here in the States and some people got tossed under the bus for even insinuating that British Intelligence had or shared any such Intel with the U.S⌠Now theyâve owned up to it after the fact.
Ah, right - I get you.
I thought the accusations from weeks ago were of British Intelligenece spying on Trump/ Trump Towers on behalf of the American Security Services? Whereas the news linked by me is of the British giving a heads-up to their US counterparts after trailing/spying on Russian counterparts and possible Russian agents - going back some time - and as to a pattern emerging over meetings with Trumpâs people (along with article that has the ex-MI6 Chief thinking that Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to help keep his empire afloat around the time of the financial crisis in 2008(-ish)).
I think they are two very different things - and the British Services were correct in denying that were spying on Trump/Trump Towers on behalf of the US Services.
The US and Brits, along with other allies often keep each other abreast of information and goings on (though likely keep the really interesting stuff from each other đ)

đ
âBritish spies were first to spot Trump teamâs links with Russiaâ:-
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
&
GCHQ âtold US security services about meetings between Donald Trumpâs team and Russiaâ:-
&
âEx-MI6 chief says Donald Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to keep his empire afloatâ:-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-mi6-chief-says-donald-10217616
Why did they deny it vehemently when the story first broke but now they own up to it?
Sorry mate - could you be a little more specific on what they denied - and what they are now âowning up toâ?
âBritish spies were first to spot Trump teamâs links with Russiaâ:-
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
&
GCHQ âtold US security services about meetings between Donald Trumpâs team and Russiaâ:-
&
âEx-MI6 chief says Donald Trump may have borrowed money from Russia to keep his empire afloatâ:-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-mi6-chief-says-donald-10217616
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_ZrK36TKrE
^ The Big Bang Theory - When Princess Leia Met Darth Vader
Iâd no idea that James Earl Jones had never met Carrie Fisher before filming that scene - I imagined lots of people on films donât actually meet each other if not in the same scene or doing voice work in post etc - but seems strange to think they never had met in 35+ years of doing interviews, talks shows, Star Wars PR and anniversaries etc.
https://twitter.com/originaltrilogy/status/852600471374118912
Sums it pretty well.
Â
I donât know much about conventions like Celebration etc - but I imagine no-one on any of the panels will be bringing up, or referring, to the subject of the lack of the OOT? - despite it actually being the 40th anniversary of the version of the film that started it all - and we all still canât buy.
(if so, I wonder who actually says to people not to mention that? Someone from Lucasfilm or Disney, or other?)
bloody hell!
Â
Â

