oojason

YodaFan67 said:

Ewok Apologetics

A good name for a band that - or something that you’d need some antibiotics for 😉

ray_afraid said:

James Whale
George Romero
Coen brothers
Ed Wood
Quentin Tarantino
Edgar Wright
John Waters
Alfred Hitchcock

I find Edgar Wright a quality and interesting director - so much that I’d go watch a movie or tv series of his even if I didn’t particularity like/interested by the genre, plot, actors, etc.

If you haven’t already watch Spaced (1999 UK comedy on Channel 4) I suggest you give it a go mate - some really nice homages in there and references to a lot films he, Simon Pegg & Jessica Stevenson enjoyed or were influenced by, plus it was pretty funny it it’s own right too 😃

Think it was free on netflix not so long ago - though it goes for pennies on dvd at ebay etc…

Alderaan said:

2020 isn’t going to make any difference. Kathleen Kennedy has already said the OOT is never coming.

Have you a reliable source for that? (other than the video which was edited that did not give anywhere like the full story when the fan asked her a question she didn’t quite grasp / misunderstood)

Alderaan said:

Alderaan said:
But that doesn’t stop a mix of eternal optimists and Disney apologists from moving the goalpost every chance they get.

Right on cue.

Anything you’d like to tell us, or explain further?

Hi RUN_LUKE_RUN,

Could you please post a little more information or detail in your first post if and when you start a new thread like this one, please?

It may help give us members on here a little more idea on what they are clicking onto - and may also in return be more likely/able to help you too.

Thanks mate 😃

dahmage said:

there was a typical spam bot. its post has since been replaced by some wise crackery by oojason (i assume). then lots of users started to treat this thread like it was created yesterday.

Doh! Rumbled - I hold my hands up.

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

there was a typical spam bot. its post has since been replaced by some wise crackery by oojason (i assume).

If that’s what happened, it was very confusing. It doesn’t help that the forum software doesn’t mark who made the edit.

I apologise for the confusion Frink - just a little fooling around by myself.

The post has now been deleted - and hopefully we’ll see less spambots around here too.

I voted for the spambot

^ very cool 😃

^ from 9 months ago - https://www.reddit.com/r/fanart/comments/5h0drg/han_solo_movie_poster_by_dennis_haacker/

^ by sahinduezguen at devinatart - https://www.deviantart.com/art/Han-Solo-Spin-Off-Teaser-630855408

Nicely done - really like the opening crawl style ‘Theatrical Collection’ lettering style on the front cover too.

‘Signal loss: Why Puerto Rico is suffering in silence’…

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-41409225/signal-loss-why-puerto-rico-is-suffering-in-silence

&

‘Why Puerto Rico’s devastation is so bad’…

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-41408570/why-hurricane-maria-hit-puerto-rico-so-hard

Harrowing scenes.

SilverWook said:

I freaked when I saw this on Ebay, as I thought it was some sort of leaked/stolen concept art.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/STAR-WARS-YT-1300-Millennium-Falcon-THE-END-diorama-art-artistic-scene-modell/311659409607

I’m still freaked after finding out it isn’t 😉

boxmonkey99 said:

Hey, is there anyone currently seeding the full 60gb Bluray ISO’s for all 3 movies? I am trying to obtain these because the menus look totally kick ass. Thanks in advance

Welcome to the site mate.

You posted your question in the ‘DVD Cover, Disc Labels, and Other Fan Artwork’ section of the ot.com mate - I don’t think you’re in the right section of the site for what you may be looking for.

I’d ask that you have a good look around the site, and when you find some of the threads for what you may be looking for, please read the posts therein - and you’ll find the answers for what you seek.

ZigZig said:

Dear Matt Brown,

Do Apple and MS think that the Prequels are THAT bad?
Is Apple Pippin video console THAT bad ?
Is Microsoft Windows 8 THAT bad ?

Thank you for your answer. May the force be with you.

mattbrown is no longer in a position to post any links to ‘help’ or ‘assistance’ more, and ‘his’ posts are now deleted.

I did like that he thought the Microsoft Service Centre (and his spam links) would help The Prequels though 😃

a 128gb USB flash drive may be a simpler, cheaper alternative for some?

A good quality branded one for that size can be found for around £30 / $30

RayRogers said:

ChainsawAsh said:

RayRogers said:

Recommended Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings games for PS2, GameCube, GBA, DS, PC? The LEGO ones are obvious for both. Battle for Middle Earth duology is also obvious for the latter. Already have quite a lot and know about “Paradise” site.

Harry Potter literally didn’t exist for me when I was 10 in 1989.

I’m confused - were these games recommended to you? Are you asking if we would recommend them? Are you recommending them to us? Why make the point about the non-existence of Harry Potter at the seemingly arbitrary age of 10 for you?

All of the above.

Try being a little more helpful to fellow posters asking reasonable questions of you, my friend - especially as it wasn’t too clear what you were saying in the first place.

‘Nintendo Classic Mini: SNES review – fun-sized reboot of greatest ever console’…

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/28/nintendo-classic-mini-snes-review-fun-sized-reboot-of-greatest-ever-console-mario-yoshi-zelda

I hope they produce a fair few more units than is already out there - the scalpers seem to have managed to get their hands on a lot of these.

21 games does seem a little on the lean side - though I suppose the trade-off is keeping the price low/competitive with likely having to pay for licencing/royalties for each game etc

It does look a lot of fun 😃

darth_ender - I can only echo what the others have said here so well mate - I wish you and your family well.
 

DuracellEnergizer - that’s some decent advice from Chewtobacca there, and maybe alos pop down to the local library or community centre etc - learn what is going on around your area and see if anything takes your interest. Good luck with it mate.

That is some great work - and nice choices of art too.

It’s always nice to have options and possibilities for our Star Wars covers & art 😃
 

Please give some consideration to starting your own thread so it, and maybe all your top work, can easily be found in one place (no worries if not) - and thank you for sharing.

Good to see the little guy getting out and about, enjoying the sea view and weather, in his beach chair, string vest and napkin on his head (old British stylee), probably reaching out to old Qui-Gon again…

Anchorhead said:

oojason said:
I love these type of retro covers…

Those CBS-Fox boxes are awesome. I remember when they were current. Fantastic work with these retro covers of late. That one has to be my favorite so far.

I can almost reach out remember the feel of the old type of paper they used for vhs covers back then 😃

SilverWook said:

Does anyone else miss the CBS/Fox logo fanfare at the beginning of a Star Wars video? Rewatching an OT LD recently reminded me how much I associate it with Star Wars.

Ha! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2hChR9-naU

There were some great old intros for many companies pre-film/video back then - and seemed to have a ‘rawness’ to them (likely the bad video sound quality 😃)

‘Behind the Magic of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story’:-

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBvi8opWTiQ - a 3 minute video from the official ILMVFX youtube channel
 

(‘This full-length reel represents a sample of the work created for over 1750 shots by hundreds of artists, scientists, and engineers around the world’.)

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Really dig this:

Cracking picture - some nice work has gone into that - a very nice homage to Empire 😃

ChainsawAsh said:

Thanks for the local context. All this stuff I picked up ages ago out of curiosity and a paper I did on the MPAA in college.

I seem to remember there being a lighter rating for kids, too - “Uc” or something, maybe?

oojason said:

There is an R18 rating in the UK - usually reserved for specially licenced sex shops and cinemas.
An E rating also exists for ‘exempt’ - usually sport, music and educational videos - though I can’t remember seeing one for a long time now; the E rating, not the R18, obviously 😃

Spend a lot of time in those sex shops, do you? 😉

Ah, nice one (on the MPAA paper) 😃

Yes, the old ‘Uc’ used to be for releases for younger children for on video (the sort of stuff toddlers and under 5’s would happily watch) - though I haven’t seen one (a title with a Uc 😉) in years now.

This is site normally quite decent for differing cuts and edits for movies and their various releases (and does often contain pictures of comparisons) - though it’s not too great for Temple Of Doom - http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=4643

ChainsawAsh said:

UK ratings are:

• U (equivalent to US “G”)
• PG (equivalent to US “PG”)
• 12/12A (equivalent to US “PG-13;” from here on out, no one under the specified age is allowed in the theater or to purchase a copy, period - EXCEPT for 12A, which is theaters-only and a recent addition; under 12 requires adult accompaniment; 12A movies are all 12 on home video, so no one under 12 is allowed to buy them at all)
• 15 (kind of a split equivalent to either a hard “PG-13” or a soft “R,” depending on the movie)
• 18 (equivalent to a hard “R” or an “NC-17”)

So if a movie is rated R in the US, it might be either a 15 or 18 in the UK. And the other ratings aren’t 100% for sure analogs, either - some PG-13 US movies might be PG in the UK, some might be 12A/12, some might be 15.

The other important thing to note is that UK ratings are mandatory for all media - it’s illegal to distribute a movie unrated in the UK, whereas in the US it’s not a law at all, just generally difficult to market and distribute unless it’s digital or home video.

Aye, in the UK, Temple Of Doom had a ‘PG’ rating back in 1984, but has been a ‘12’ since 2012, and there was a 5 minute difference between the cinema and the video releases back in the 80’s:-

http://bbfc.co.uk/releases/indiana-jones-and-temple-doom-1984

There is an R18 rating in the UK - usually reserved for specially licenced sex shops and cinemas.
An E rating also exists for ‘exempt’ - usually sport, music and educational videos - though I can’t remember seeing one for a long time now; the E rating, not the R18, obviously 😃

TM2YC said:

CatBus said:

Right Said Fred’s _I’m Too Sexy. Okay, maybe they technically have other songs, but really who’d know?

What about ‘Deeply Dippy’?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDZXQOJiqQM

“Deeply dippy bout the way you walk, a contact sport, let the neighbours talk. Deeply dippy I’m your Superman, I’ll explain, you’re my Lois Lane”

Their whole debut ‘Up’ album is a pop classic (first CD I bought in '92). Every song sounds like it could have been a single (half of them were). I could sing every lyric. I’m not joking, really I’m not joking.

You are Richard Fairbrass?

I knew it! 😉

For me, album wise…

Manic Street Preachers
Fine Young Cannibals (not a lot I know - but of my youth)
Deacon Blue
Pink Floyd
Carole King
The Beatles
The Smiths
The Cure
The La’s (not a lot I know)
Cast
Electronic
New Order
Madness
Sheryl Crow
Stone Roses
The Specials
The Beat (aka ‘The English Beat’ for our US friends)
The Last Internationale
The Housemartins
Beautiful South
Echo & The Bunnymen
Elvis Costello
The Bangles

I used to listen to them all at various times - though I likely couldn’t name many songs at all - apart from if I started listening to the albums again.

yhwx said:

Here is my statement/open letter defending Warbler here:

When in the course of forum events, it may sometimes become necessary for forum members to be banned, temporarily or not, by the moderation of the forum. It is my opinion that a miscarriage of justice was committed when Warbler was banned on Sunday.

While Warbler’s posts regarding the issue of the National Anthem may have been inflammatory, such is the nature of an argumentative discussion. A certain level of leeway must be allowed, as long as all people feel comfortable in the discussion. As I did not see any complaints of legitimate offense during the course of our previous discussion, I feel that it is safe to say that all people felt comfortable in that discussion. Angry, yes, but comfortable. If certain people did not feel at ease because of Warbler’s presence, my opinion may have been different.

Next, I feel that there is an amount of contradiction of actions by the entirety of the moderation on this board. While many other, more inflammatory members have continued to roam free on this forum for many months, and in some cases, even years, Warbler got punished simply, in my opinion, on a first offense. This also leaves open the door to the question of if this action has belied prevailing political opinions that some may have.

Interesting discussion requires a reasonable variety of viewpoints. Some viewpoints, such as white supremacism, are unacceptable, and I am not saying that those viewpoints are within that reasonable variety. However, I do believe that Warbler’s viewpoint, at this moment, was in that reasonable variety.

I do respect the right that the moderation have to discipline any member however they see fit, for any reason, or for no reason at all. I 100% believe in that right, and would fight for it. However, I do also believe in the right to voice grievances of the leadership of any organization. These are my grievances, and I hope they are considered by the leadership here.

I am in agreement with many of your well-made points - though a ‘miscarriage of justice’ may be laying it on a little thick somewhat.

Since making your post you have likely read the reasons as to why Warbler was given a couple of days off in the form of a cool-off temp-ban (I have got to come up with another way of stating this - as I think I’m wearing down these specific keys on the keyboard too much). The decision to do so taken after he had stated he stopped listening to everyone, and when asked to once again explain himself in a better fashion he stated it would be a waste of time - and continued to post inflammatory posts (and likely would have posted more).

I took the decision to put those posts to a halt - partly for the reasons given since, partly as he wasn’t engaging in any meaningful conversation with other posters, and as a moderator I have a duty to the site to try ensure some level of reasonable discourse; I certainly wasn’t comfortable with the was the thread was heading.

On your next paragraph re ‘amount of contradiction of actions by the entirety of the moderation on this board’… as said elsewhere I can’t comment on those past things - I haven’t seen them, I wasn’t a mod at the time and am unaware of the history thereof. Was this at a time when the ‘Off Topic’ section was unmoderated? I can’t speak for the other mods. Everyone else in that thread was told by me (in the very same post that I let Warbler know he was being given a couple of days off) that the same cool-off temp-ban would apply to them if they did the same as what he did on Sunday night. If Warbler had written his posts in a reasonable non inflammatory manner, he’d still be here - regardless of political opinion. Other posters on the ot.com may have received similar to Warbler, though it may not be publicly known to members in general.

Variety in viewpoint is indeed a requirement for interesting debate and should be encouraged. His viewpoint in the main was fine - the delivery was not, nor was his stance at being asked to explain himself better.

Re your final paragraph - I agree with the mods having the right to ‘discipline’ any poster they see fit - though I disagree with it if it were for no reason at all. I do completely agree with your assertation in the belief to the right to voice reasonable grievances of the leadership of any organisation too.
 

I hope I have answered your questions both adequately and satisfactorily - though accept you may not like or agree with (some of) the answers given. Please feel free to PM me if you have any further questions - thank you.