logo Sign In

oojason

User Group
Members
Join date
5-May-2004
Last activity
22-Jan-2026
Posts
9,221

Post History

Post
#1178488
Topic
When Han Solo was Frozen in Carbinite How did he survive so long without Water ?
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1178488/action/topic#1178488
Time

Darth Tag said:

HI all. Han solo was not supposed to be frozen in this substance, Luke skywalker was! Boba Fett and Darth Vader agreed to use Han solo as a test. The Carbonite froze everything that was working in him so he did not need any food or water. The real question is, How did he survive if his heart stopped? This is simmilar to a heart attack called Scad. This is when there is a tear in an artery of the heart, Mostly happens to women. Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is also called sudden cardiac death. Sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart suddenly stops beating, which stops oxygen-rich blood from reaching the brain and other organs. … This causes death of the heart muscle. But a heart attack does not always mean that the heart stops beating. So, Han solo must have survived this!

You bumped a 14 year old post with incorrect medical terms for part of a plot from a sci-fi film - as your first post on here?

SCA can often result in a sudden cardiac death - yet Solo didn’t die… nor did he seemingly suffer from a heart attack from being frozen in carbonite. Nor did ‘This causes death of the heart muscle’.

Bad bot.

Post
#1178328
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1178328/action/topic#1178328
Time

Tobar said:

Whether what she recounts is accurate or not, she’s going to be in trouble for this one:
Star Wars 8: Rian Johnson THREW OUT JJ Abrams entire Last Jedi outline says Daisy Ridley

Ah mate - that’s from the Daily Express - who seem to often run/sensationalise a daily click-bait Star Wars article taken out of context just to get hits. They are not reliable - or accurate in their reporting/article content - personally I’d take anything that appears from there with a pinch of salt.
 

A more accurate article in the context of what Daisy Ridley originally said, and where she said it, can be found here:-

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2018/03/02/jj-abrams-wrote-drafts-for-star-wars-8-and-9-says-daisy-ridley

and the translated article mentioned in it, can be found here - link
 

(and all credit to https://daisyridleys.tumblr.com/post/171361502495/daisy-ridleys-interview-for-geek-le-mag)

Post
#1178304
Topic
<strong>Solo</strong> : A Star Wars Story - film &amp; fan art, + covers etc
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1178304/action/topic#1178304
Time

^ from https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsLeaks/comments/81p1wc/solo_textless_posters_combined_into_one_big_banner/

 

some textless individual banners of those above can be found here:-

https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsLeaks/comments/81jufc/solo_high_resolution_textless_character_posters/

 

a new Japanese poster:-

an English text version can be found here:-

http://www.uruloki.org/felipeblog/imagenes2018/20180302-han-solo-star-wars.jpg

Post
#1177974
Topic
Random Thoughts
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1177974/action/topic#1177974
Time

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.

A single thread page and only 3 days previous does not constitute “old”.

Also “the start if the topic”? Do you mean the thread OP; or the beginning of that string of conversation? Because Random Thoughts are random, and not only was DE’s comment the beginning of that conversational string, but also Frink (seemingly) didn’t/doesn’t understand either. So in either case of what you meant, reading back through is irrelevant.

In the context of it being ‘old’ as in it is not a current discussion. And, yes a 3 day old post would constitute an old post (for me, anyway).

Also yes, the start of the topic does mean ‘the beginning of that string of conversation’, as you put it.

No, it’s not irrelevant - it’s good practice for posting on a forum in general, yes?

So you’re saying that if I visit the forum regularly but don’t read a particular thread for a few days, and the topic of conversation since last viewing doesn’t span more than a couple pages at best, I am still not eligible to remark on something someone said?

No, that’s not what I am saying at all.

I said ‘you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about’.

Post
#1177935
Topic
Random Thoughts
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1177935/action/topic#1177935
Time

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.

A single thread page and only 3 days previous does not constitute “old”.

Also “the start if the topic”? Do you mean the thread OP; or the beginning of that string of conversation? Because Random Thoughts are random, and not only was DE’s comment the beginning of that conversational string, but also Frink (seemingly) didn’t/doesn’t understand either. So in either case of what you meant, reading back through is irrelevant.

In the context of it being ‘old’ as in it is not a current discussion. And, yes a 3 day old post would constitute an old post (for me, anyway).

Also yes, the start of the topic does mean ‘the beginning of that string of conversation’, as you put it.

No, it’s not irrelevant - it’s good practice for posting on a forum in general, yes?

Post
#1177924
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1177924/action/topic#1177924
Time

Mrebo said:

oojason said:

Mrebo said:

Death and violence is not going to end, subject to a total remaking of the world.

Indeed mate - though many places in the world thankfully don’t have as many (or anywhere near the number of) school shootings.

We should focus on making schools safe! For the particular story I’m commenting on, would we rather this domestic dispute happened off campus? Sure, but I don’t think that’s the most important thing that happened her. Nor would I have been more pleased if a car or knife had been used.

The inference was that maybe US schools should take a look at other schools and countries around the world - and ask why they have fewer school shootings.

And the shooting at the Michigan School is not a domestic dispute - going on the news report that Collipso linked to it happened at school, yes?

The better outcome is to not have a dispute with guns involved at all, right?

Post
#1177908
Topic
Random Thoughts
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1177908/action/topic#1177908
Time

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.