logo Sign In

nickyd47

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
18-Jan-2016
Last activity
15-Aug-2018
Posts
426

Post History

Post
#1067615
Topic
Star Wars Insider celebrates the 40th anniversary with...
Time

Wolfman said:

After arriving at work totally knackered each morning after live streaming Celebration Orlando here in the UK, a guy at work asked me if I had Star Wars on Blu-ray. When I said no and explained why he was really confused. Looked at me in bewilderment. He had no idea at all about the original cuts and to be honest did not care at all. This same guy was confused as to where Rey and Finn were in Rogue One.
There lies our problem I think. The casual viewer. The public who see the films as just another movie to watch and then put to one side.

People like him don’t dictate Star Wars at all

Post
#1067453
Topic
Star Wars Insider celebrates the 40th anniversary with...
Time

nickyd47 said:

Fang Zei said:

nickyd47 said:

There’s also a magazine coming out thats labeled itself as the “guide to the 1977 classic”

Now they’re really rubbing it in.

There’s a comic for the special edition version of the film and it’s labeled as the special edition and in the Amazon description it says and I paraphrase “a graphic novel of the special edition version of Star Wars”. Then there’s that magazine labeled as a guide to the 1977 classic. Not 1997 classic. Not 2004 classic. Not 2011 classic. Make of this what you will. I think it’s a good sign.

“Revisit the original space opera in a comic book adaptation of the special edition of Star Wars: Episode IV- A New Hope, the ultimate realization of George Lucas’ creative vision!”
—The description for the graphic novel

Post
#1067444
Topic
Star Wars Insider celebrates the 40th anniversary with...
Time

Fang Zei said:

nickyd47 said:

There’s also a magazine coming out thats labeled itself as the “guide to the 1977 classic”

Now they’re really rubbing it in.

There’s a comic for the special edition version of the film and it’s labeled as the special edition and in the Amazon description it says and I paraphrase “a graphic novel of the special edition version of Star Wars”. Then there’s that magazine labeled as a guide to the 1977 classic. Not 1997 classic. Not 2004 classic. Not 2011 classic. Make of this what you will. I think it’s a good sign.

Post
#1067189
Topic
Star Wars Insider celebrates the 40th anniversary with...
Time

People are willing to drop hundreds of dollars on bootlegs and those s#### DVDs from 2006. Those DVDs that Lucas himself felt compelled to release. Millions of people have downloaded the Despecialized Edition. Popular American icons have publicly let their distaste of the SE known. Disney may not care for those versions of those films, but they care about money. You will never convince me that only a fringe want the OOT. The demand is there.