negative1

later

-1

TV's Frink said:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Duplicate-header-error-when-clicking-on-link/topic/13957/

ha ha..

i didn't get it until today either!

slow..

lame..

etc..

later

-1

Laserschwert said:

Asaki said:

Yeah, that's just lots of JPG compression.

 

Laserschwert said:

Man, I'd love to get my hands on the raw capture of that shot and the fly-by... cleaning up the JSC fly-by for Harmy's version was a challenge, but it might be a bit easier with a higher res source.

Well, the thing is...if/when this project gets released, Harmy won't need to despecialize the Special Edition anymore ;) 

 

There's a lot more left to be done once the 35mm stuff is all captured... thus, for now I only would like to have those two shots, which were two of the biggest SE victims ;)

check your pm... same for Harmy..

later

-1

TV's Frink said:

Best...thread...ever.

Worst...reply...ever.

Haha

later

-1

this thread is not that old..

check out this one:

bumped after 4 years..

some crazy guy (wonder who?)

started it in 2008:

-

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/frame-data--star-wars-GOUT-NTSC-widescreen/post/324797/#TopicPost324797

and the same guy bumped it 

-

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/frame-data--star-wars-GOUT-NTSC-widescreen/post/565694/#TopicPost565694

the nerve of some people!

ha ha..

later

-1

TV's Frink said:

I opened this thread on my phone.

You owe me one phone.

don't you know by now,

a lot of my threads are data-bombs!

it's a TRAP! mwhaaaa ha ha ha!!!

later

-1

none of these links in the first post seem to work..

i've posted a message in the bugs forum.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Duplicate-header-error-when-clicking-on-link/post/567078/#TopicPost567078

later

-1

Jay said:

That's not a valid link. It points to the old forum software. Haven't used that in years.

thanks jay,

that might mean that every link

here is broken:

-------------------

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Project-Index-Star-Wars-Preservation-and-Other-Projects/post/111400/#TopicPost111400

-----------------------

I checked on some other ones,

and none of them worked either.

=================================

UPDATE : here is the message:

Duplicate headers received from server

later

-1

again, using the official screenshot comparisons,

here are the ratios for cropping compared to film:

-----

later

-1

more comparisons from the screenshot comparisons:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-NEW-official-Screenshots-thread/topic/4681/

again the shots are softer, and the colors are  darker

in the print: gout on the top

-------------

-----------------------

--------------------------

================================

=====================

===================

later

-1

TV's Frink said:

Stop making sense.

fixed - talking heads

(trust me, its not the first time!)

later

-1

using chrome,

clicking on this link gives me a duplicate header error:

--

http://www.originaltrilogy.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=9&threadid=6953

later

-1

perhaps you could add the CED transfers:

=============================

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Original-Trilogy-on-CED-preservations/topic/10665/

they are all on alt.binaries.starwars

later

-1

TV's Frink said:

 

negative1 said:

TV's Frink said:

You're going to lurk this thread now too?  Yay!

not unless you do.

let's see who can hold out the longest,

and not post here! i dare you! i double dare you!

starting in ..3  ..2 ..1 (after this post of course)

 

later

-1

 

yeah, well you know..

don't want to be rude!

besides you posted again too! ha ha!!!

got you there!!!

later

-1

Arnie.d said:

Some screenshots:

here are some more comparisons

against the laserdisc:

------

-------------

---------------------------

-----------------------------

later

-1

TServo2049 said:

Some more film cell images I found on eBay, this time from the first film. These are a higher resolution than the ones I posted before, but lighting is  much more uneven - you can see that the person who took the photos was shining a flashlight down onto the cells, so some parts will look blown out, others look too dark/translucent (and you can often see the texture of the white bedsheet under the cell). Some of the images have similar greenish tendencies to the Jedi1.net scans, others don't.

 

Leia captured - wow, that's blown out. It looks cold where the light is strongest, but you can see yellow and green and cyan tendencies on the right side where there's not as much light:

here are our versions:

"Secret mission? What plans? What are you talking about? I'm not getting in there!"

 

Another seller's photo - this one of Leia and R2. Looks too cool?

 

 

Vader grills Leia on the Tantive. Again with the odd light source, not sure what to make of this image:

 

again, some are a little dark..

later

-1

LexX said:

msycamore said:

The -83 rental tape! that is an old one:) Thanks for the trouble. It actually comes very close to the bootleg telecine in color from what I can see, it is pretty much the same on the vintage doc The Making of STAR WARS also. Then I strongly believe what zombie84 already said, that it's probably more accurate or closer in color pallette of the original -77 print in just that scene than the THX/GOUT version is.

Yeah, but still the tape is waaay too light during the whole movie, here's a couple of more examples :

 

here's our version:

kinda dark..

later

-1

dark_jedi said:

Hey negative1 please clear out some of your PM's, I can't respond to your last one because you are full lol, so do some cleaning.

oops..

sorry about that...yeah, that box keeps getting

full, even after i clean it up. ha ha..

we should be good now.

later

-1

and a few more with the rebels

and c3p0 and r2d2:

-------------------------

later

-1

here are more shots of the rebels:

-------------------------

later

-1

tservo: right, i didn't repost your comments yet!

here's pictures from the empire strikes back

compared:

===========================

later

-1

none said:

^ What is the software which helps create these pics?

 

nothing special.. just used paintshop pro. ha ha!

the calculations were done with calculator, that's it.

by the way, good resources about projecting:

-----------

1

http://hsvmovies.com/static_subpages/formats/anamorphic_format.html

2

http://hsvmovies.com/static_subpages/formats/aspect.html

3

http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/lbx.htm

later

-1

CatBus said:

I think one showing how much was cropped in projection would be good, too, just to show the GOUT cropping wasn't bad at all relatively speaking.

harmy posted this about the theatrical cropping:

That's a really interesting idea. And even more interesting results: 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-PpDwMu_u-ME/TsVcyg46xsI/AAAAAAAABE4/8aZybqIPGHQ/Star%252520Wars%252520Episode%252520IV%252520A%252520New%252520Hope%2525201977%252520720p%252520HDTV%252520x264-DON_25fps.m2ts_snapshot_01.07.13_%25255B2011.11.17_19.48.42%25255D.jpg

And that's only compared with the 2004 master, which is already cropped!

harmy

--------------------

later

-1

PilotGav said:

Hi all!

 

I am trying so hard to find a copy of the 1977 album "The Story of Star Wars". I had that as a kid and wore it out listening to it. I can't think of anyting I'd like more than to hear it again.

 

Does anyone know where I can find it anywhere? I've read that years ago a user names "Scotty Balls" made a great RIP of the vinyl, but can't find that anywhere.

Of course I'd be willing to pay for a copy if it's not available to download somehow.

Thanks so much for any help you can give. This would be such a gift.

 

Gavin

the previous poster was right, go to lost turntable

and do a search for star wars:

http://www.lostturntable.com/?p=1418

later

-1

patkhoo said:

Of course, let's see, a 120 min movie @ 30 frames/s = 12,960,000 frames. 

how did you get that?

2 hr = 2 hr x 60 min/hr = 120 min

120 min x 60 sec/min = 7200 sec

7200 sec x 30 frames/sec = 216000 frames

(if it was the normal 24 frame/sec) =  7200 sec x 24 frames/sec=172280 frames

i started a frame reference count for the whole

movie in the technical forum:

------------------------------------------------------------

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/frame-data--star-wars-GOUT-NTSC-widescreen/topic/9567/

only got through the first reel so far, around 27000+ frames.

later

-1