logo Sign In

imperialscum

User Group
Members
Join date
7-Mar-2013
Last activity
16-Jan-2022
Posts
3,205

Post History

Post
#630738
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

thekremlin said:

Killing Maul was a missed opportunity to have a really cool villain in all three films. It was similar to killing Boba Fett in such a crap way IMO. Waste of a good character.

I have to disagree with Boba Fett. I don't think you can waste character with the way he dies. Actually I like Boba's death (well tbh I like some of EU stuff where he survived so I believe he survived). I hate the comic book / "Hollywood" style death at the end of an overinflated final "epic" battle. That kind of stuff is just cheap, common and boring to me.

I love the way Boba and Emperor were killed. Especially the Emperor. No pomp. It was unexpected, simplistic and brutally realistic. Vader picked him up and threw him into the reactor shaft. Perfect and original.

Post
#630543
Topic
Star wars v.s Star trek
Time

Star Wars projects all we are/know through the fairytale into the "galaxy far far away". There is something for everyone. You have a good/evil human nature, romance, drama, mythology, politics, war, technology, military (ships, vehicles, officer, soldiers)... only on the escapism level.

This is what makes Star Wars so great and so unique in the film history. Star Trek, while enjoyable, is somewhat limited.

Post
#630513
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

thekremlin said:

Has GL ever given a decent reason for why he killed Maul off? Or was it just another misguided attempt at symphonic symmetry (Maul/Kenobi)?

 

PS. Hello everyone! First post. :)

I think he wanted to make some conclusion. I mean if one of the main heroes is killed, the general audience expects a dead villain as a compensation. :)

Post
#630507
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

Jaitea said:

Theres a difference between the brains & the brawn in the film, sure Tarkin is the man 'holding Vaders leash', the guy who has the final say in the film, but Vader is the Villain, sorry....thats the fact

J

Sure it is a fact that Vader is a villain. But the fact is also that Tarkin is a villain. The only thing in question is who is the main villain in the film. Considering Tarkin being the "boss" of the bad guys in this film and that he does far more evil things than Vader I would be safe to assume he is the main villain.

Post
#630499
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

Jaitea said:

imperialscum said:

Besides, OT too have more villains. In Hope Tarkin is the main villain. In Empire it is Vader. And in Jedi it is the Emperor.

But in all the one sheets of SW the largest character depicted....the villain....isn't Tarkin, also the original Palitoy toys.....there was no Tarkin....hmmm

Well I think you don't need toys and sheets to figure out that Tarkin is the main villain. You just need to watch the film. After all he is the one who orders the destruction of Alderaan and Yavin and orders Leia's execution. But I guess it is up to one's opinion. :)

Post
#630475
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

Bingowings said:

The Star Wars story is a saga not just a series of random episodes set in the same galaxy.

You are actually wrong about that. In sense of narrative structure, character development and focus, even OT and PT are not saga. The OT is a story and PT is a back-story to the OT. Not to mention to what extent the Star Wars universe has grown. It is far more than a saga.

Post
#630472
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

That is all fine in theory but realistically speaking I just don't see Carrie Fisher being capable of delivering this great villain you are talking about.

I think they would be just wasting the whole trilogy potential if they pursued the character potential you are talking about.

And this is supposed to be 30 years after the OT. How could you possibly expect that some torture or some near loss of Han that happened 30 years ago would lead Leia to the dark side.

Post
#630457
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

Krakatoa said:

imperialscum said:

I don't think the trilogy should have one main villain. I think there should be more (imperial officers, crime lords etc.).

 

Like the prequels!

Just because it was in prequels it doesn't mean it is bad. Besides, OT too have more villains. In Hope Tarkin is the main villain. In Empire it is Vader. And in Jedi it is the Emperor.

Post
#630448
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

I just can't imagine Carrie Fisher playing the main villain... it would be laughable. I think her role in the film should be minimal.

Bingowings said:

Vader effectively reduced the Jedi down to the same numbers as the Sith (a master and an apprentice).

This left Luke and Leia (a master and an apprentice).

The force sensitives are born randomly across the galaxy so there is a plenty of other choices for villains. And why would the main villain even have to be force sensitive?

I don't think the trilogy should have one main villain. I think there should be more (imperial officers, crime lords etc.).

Post
#630384
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

adrienschmitt said:

the only way it could work is if Leia turns to the dark side, I do hope J.J Abrams and the screenwriters considers this.

I that a joke? That would be just plain awful.

Anyway I think the storyline and initial screenplay draft were written long before JJ even came aboard. I just hope the storyline doesn't suck. If the storyline is decent then I think we can actually get an enjoyable film.

Post
#630176
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Cobra Kai said:

It wasn't just the bad dialogue though.  GL even admits that he is not an "actor's director," and that he is really more of an editor, and anyone that's ever been  on a movie set has seen just how much influence a director has on the actor's overall performance. 

All of the characters in the PT came across as wooden and lifeless, and we all know those respective actors are perfectly capable of strong performances.  Having good dialogue would have helped, but without a competent director at the helm, the resulting performances still would have been much the same. 

But yeah, that dialogue is horrible, lol...

"I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere. Not like here. Here everything's soft... and smooth…"

In my opinion, the dialogue and acting aren't the crucial problem. The fault is much more fundamental. The problem is that Lucas decided that Anakin will be annoying/whiny (80% of the scenes), greedy (scenes when he whines about being held back) and hypocritical/ungrateful (scenes when he complains about Obi-Wan behind his back). The whole storyline was formed around this annoying drama scenes which show all his bad traits.

I mean when you listen to the Obi-Wan in Hope telling Luke about Anakin, you get an impression this was a good guy and a good friend of Obi-Wan. In PT he is a complete opposite of that. He is actually a terrible person.

Different people writing dialogue and directing actors based on that kind of storyline evolved around such a repulsive character would not change anything.

Instead of all this annoying drama there should be fun adventures. And instead of a repulsive moron as a main character, Anakin should be actually a good person to whom audience can relate to and care about. After all Star Wars is supposed to be fun adventure/fantasy film, not a bad drama about troubled teenager growing up.

Post
#630148
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

Though I think Anakin in AOTC and ROTS was even more annoying and repulsive character than Jar Jar in TPM.

Agreed.

Let's hope Disney does a better job getting convincing acting out of the actors in Episode VII.

I actually think the problem wasn't the acting. The character itself was designed and written to be an annoying, arrogant, greedy, hypocritical moron. Hayden just did a good job portraying that character. :)

Post
#630145
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

PT is only a back-story to OT and should therefore be watched after OT.

... if at all. :-)

Hehe, I personally wouldn't watch it but I am trying to speak in general so I don't offend anyone who likes PT. :D

Truth-be-told, I enjoy The Phantom Menace, but I think that's just because the laserdisc is so amazing. Also, Creepy Puppet Yoda.

If I am honest, to me TPM even feels a bit like OT at times, unlike AOTC and ROTS.

I feel the same way.

Many complain about Jake Lloyd's acting, but I thought it was fine. Jar Jar is the real problem IMO.

Agreed.

Though I think Anakin in AOTC and ROTS was even more annoying and repulsive character than Jar Jar in TPM.

Post
#630140
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

PT is only a back-story to OT and should therefore be watched after OT.

... if at all. :-)

Hehe, I personally wouldn't watch it but I am trying to speak in general so I don't offend anyone who likes PT. :D

Truth-be-told, I enjoy The Phantom Menace, but I think that's just because the laserdisc is so amazing. Also, Creepy Puppet Yoda.

If I am honest, to me TPM even feels a bit like OT at times, unlike AOTC and ROTS.

Post
#630131
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Well I don't like any variations. Especially since I think Empire and Jedi are so well connected that it is a huge waste if not watched in succession (when I watch OT I even watch Empire and Jedi the same day).

As for episode order... well that's just dumb. The OT was written, designed and made in way that you start with Hope. PT is only a back-story to OT and should therefore be watched after OT.

Post
#630117
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

SilverWook said:

Darth Hade said

There’s not enough makeup in the world to make Fisher look human anymore.

I don’t understand why she would want to be in this film.

That is not someone who belongs on the big screen.

Ford should vanish as well.

All that is needed is Hamill’s version of Obi-Wan (Old Luke).

The word that all three seem to be coming back reeks of desperation.

That first line can certainly be construed as an insult.

Wait... are Darth Hade and imperialscum the same person?

Of course not... Anyway why didn't you jump on this Darth Hade guy who actually wrote something insulting?

Post
#629956
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

Are you telling me that "sadly make-up can't fix the neck fat" wasn't intended to be insulting? Are you saying that you were simply stating an observation sans emotions?

It's still insulting to call someone fat even if said person is fat and acknowledges that he/she is fat, publicly.

I must've hit a nerve. It's funny that you chose to reply to my reply even though you had several others to choose from.

No it certainly wasn't intended to be insulting. The statement wasn't directed to anyone specifically and it applies in general. I did NOT call anyone fat. I did not use an adjective at all.

You did not hit any nerve. You made the first reply so it is a common sense you get my attention first. On top of that, you made ridiculous accusations so I had to set you straight.

Post
#629945
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

imperialscum said:

She has tons of make-up on all pictures posted on this page... sadly make-up can't fix the neck fat.

I think her new line will be "Help me CGI, you are my only hope".

You win. A+!

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, demonstrates that one is a good human being more than using a forum on the WWW to insult a celebrity actress without her knowing.

Just how was I insulting anyone? Point one thing in any of my posts in this thread that is an insult.

I did not even say she looks bad. All I said was that (in my opinion) she doesn't look much like an older Leia from OT.