- Post
- #1410659
- Topic
- The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1410659/action/topic#1410659
- Time
I’m just going to say this; please be aware that though this is a fanedit, there is more diversity of thought on the opinions of how TFA, TLJ, and TROS can fit together than many of you here are aware. I’ve spent years dabbling in Star Wars fiction, both the stuff considered good and bad. My own edits reflect a specific intent to show as wide of a view into the universe as possible, preserving it so as to let people make up their own minds as to what is true and what isn’t. Removing content is something I scarcely do, by choice, because I believe that there should be room for fans to interpret, and there are many ways to interpret certain lines beyond a simple literal read. Speculating on those details is what fans have done for years, and debating on their meanings often ends up giving rise to new ideas later. Removing those ideas robs fans of the chance to expand on those details into something greater. A single line can often be an entire story of its own to tell at a later date, one that can end up being far more satisfying than the original read. This isn’t a bad thing; it’s part of what makes the Star Wars universe so rich. Some wonderful stories from very talented authors come out of these wacky “retcons” or teases.
I’ve only removed one single conversation from my film edits so far, by choice, because I simply felt the performance on that scene detracted and took viewers out of the moment. I don’t like doing this, and I’ve even had a hadful of people ask me to reverse these decisions. I’m sticking to my guns, but I can understand their arguments. Even the worst lines for me may hold value to many fans that I wasn’t previously aware of, even if they are a canon contradiction, or just poorly written/phrased. Hence the whole “prequel memes” phenomena.
What Hal is doing here with this film is very different from my own approach, and that’s okay. He does remove things, tweaks pacing, and tries to do so in a logical and sensible fashion. And he does a good job too, especially with this trilogy. Most of his editorializing keeps the story largely intact but fixes things like pacing and solves minor gaffes, or makes major cosmetic improvements with the help of talented members in the community; something that is difficult for a single artist like myself to do on my own. I applaud the balance he’s found so far, even if I disagree with a few choices.
Again, retconning major facts about the trilogy is what I feel does not belong in this edit, and like it or not, the nature of the dyad are now major established facts within the Star Wars canon. These ideas will be expanded upon in future lore at some point, no doubt. Likely in ways that will improve their context, because that’s what has been happening with these films ever since the 70s.
I want this edit to stand the test of time. I’d like to show it to others as a good alternative to the official cut, not because of what it removes, but because of what it ads; a much stronger third act and better validation for Star Wars as a 9 film saga and a collection of TV shows fans know and love, nor merely a handful of movies in the 80s. TROS should be an ending to 40+ years of what this fandom has created, and yet the vanilla version only does so very weakly, both in its native story as well as its connections to what came before (its fanservice, if you will). It’s not perfect, but overall v1 of this TROS edit massively improves upon that. I think it found the perfect balance with the script as it is, and I can proudly and excitedly recommend it to others because of that, and the friends I have shown the v1 too agree with me that this is already a much stronger take on the film as it was.
This isn’t my project, not even close. I may still do my own take on the ST someday (though am deliberately choosing not too at this time), but until that time comes, I’d rather have this be the strongest version of the existing canon story that it can be, one that adds to it while still preserving the intent as much as possible, and even if that intent doesn’t line up perfectly with TFA and TLJ in our minds now, I have seen many whom feel it does, and I think it’d be a mistake not to consider that.
I’ll get off my soapbox now. It’s Hal’s edit and I’ve made my case. I just want to make sure all voices are heard clearly on this debate.