I’d be very interested to hear how film was converted to VHS, especially if he could give any insight into Pan & Scan. Who was brought in to do that? Did directors ever have any input into it?
Yes, there were a ton of audio mix options out there, so the Blu-ray not having “the right mix” isn’t a change so much a possible separate audio track. We could even be complaining that the IMAX ratio isn’t on the Blu-ray.
The Blu-ray is a representation of a specific aspect ratio and audio mix. Maybe the eventual 4K Ultra HD version with the Atmos or DTS:X track will have these elusive sounds.
I want to see a brainless Han Solo remote-controlled by a race of go-go dancers.
Of course… it’s a story so simple, a child could do it… a child could do it.
Well done, you two.
My main problem with Revisited wasn’t the added music, but the fact that no physical editing to the Darth v Obi fight itself was done.
Actually, the fight is heavily re-edited in Revisited.
Subtitle sand people roars so it all end up being a big misunderstanding
I hope you’re joking
No, I’m with Hansi, sounds like a funny idea.
After seeing Civil War, I’m not 100% behind the movie, but it was good enough. The Airport Scene was awesome, but the motivations for the scene were kind of flimsy to me. They did good at making both sides of the War seem wrong, but I wish more of the movie was the third act when it got personal.
I said it before I’ll say it again. Unless someone official with Lucasfilm and/or Disney (no not ‘someone familiar on the subject’) confirms or disconfirms the release of the OUT, only then will I ‘let it go’.
<insert image of Elsa from Frozen singing “Let It Go”>
She technically works for Disney.
^Lando could have died, we don’t really know yet. Schrödinger’s Lando, as I believe I called it in another thread.
Lando appears in one of the LEGO short films which are considered canon minus the LEGOy bits.
Those are canon? Hm.
At least the first TFA bit, it picks up right after the canon 3PO comic. I just want Ackbar to have a ship called “Daisy Mae” in the movies.
I’m going to get this out of the way:
You catch on pretty quick.
^Yeah. They don’t call him by name in the movie, so he/she is who ever you want 'em to be.
Duracell, you know better than to take every bit of EU as personal cannon.
Pretty sure he’s in the credits though.
We’re working feverishly behind the scenes to make this rare event a very special experience.
Interesting.
invite all the members who haven’t yet proven themselves to be complete dicks
Do you have a measure and units for this “dickness” property?
Only people who joined before 21-Jul-2015, obviously. 😉
I will never understand why they’re calling the Infinity War movies “Part 1/2” when they should call them Infinity Gauntlet and Infinity War respectively.
Then you’ll be pleased to know that they’re not calling them “Part 1/2” anymore:
In other news, the Russo’s have been on a tear in the press junket. I’ve been seeing them pop up all over the place lately. Just today they revealed the Infinity War films are going to be retitled:
“The movies are two very different movies,” said Joe Russo, adding, “The intention is we will change it, we just haven’t come up with the titles yet. But, yes, we will change it. And, yes, that is a scoop: we will retitle them.”
Yes, floaty dinosaur is a different moment than dinosaur ass.
Disagree. I don’t have a better solution, but nothing sounds more elitist than that, which is what people seem to accuse us of already.
I’m relieved that the “Parts” are being dropped. Except for the main part of “First Avenger”, every movie has been chronological so far (as the bookends of FA are). I didn’t like the idea of having an “Infinity War Part 1” cliffhanger, then have two or three movies, then resolve that cliffhanger. I’m sure that was never the plan, but the “Parts” name implies that.
http://solecollector.com/news/2016/05/nintendo-vans-sneakers
Yes please.
And it’s the same actor/puppeteer.
Ady’s leaving this forum, not the edit.
The Facebook, Twitter, Wordpress, and even Google+ links can be found in my signature.
Sure, but DE is specifically referring to the KJV-only people. There was a church not far from my (Bible) college that had a sign that insisted if you weren’t reading KJV you were going to hell.
Ha, that’s crazy. Do people who don’t speak english have only an eternity in the fiery depths of hell to look forward to?
Gotta teach 'em English!
Sure, but DE is specifically referring to the KJV-only people. There was a church not far from my (Bible) college that had a sign that insisted if you weren’t reading KJV you were going to hell.
I think it’s more the people who insist that a 400 year old translation of the Bible specifically designed to be anti-Puritan/pro-Church of England is somehow more holy than any other translation made in modern English using more accurate original sources.
Hey did you hear that people on other websites think I’m a harasser too?
Probably not the one where you’re a moderator… Maybe the two(!) designed from the ground up to be angry reactions to this site?
