logo Sign In

doubleofive

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Mar-2008
Last activity
10-Nov-2025
Posts
11,910
Web Site
http://www.doubleofive.com

Post History

Post
#1019166
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

jedimasterobiwan said:

DominicCobb said:

jedimasterobiwan said:

DominicCobb said:

jedimasterobiwan said:

doubleofive said:

Dreamaster said:

jedimasterobiwan said:

… i just want an update on it because it’s been almost a month now…

The project is 8+ years old. Just let that sink in for a moment.

It’s POSSIBLE that JMOW wasn’t born when the project started.

i’m 31 jerk

You know it’s illegal to lie on the internet, right?

i’m not lying i’m dead serious

Come on now, Santa’s watching.

i was born march 10 1985

Perhaps if you bothered with either spelling, capitalization, or punctuation at any point, we’d be more inclined to believe you were out of junior high.

Now can we move on, to ask how Rogue One will affect Adywan’s edit? 😉

Post
#1017243
Topic
Doing a screenshot appears to work, but does not show the image
Time

darthrush said:

If I want to screenshot a cool frame while playing something in VLC, I just go full screen, hit the print screen button, open up paint, then paste, and then save it as a JPEG.

You don’t just use the screenshot tool built into the program that saves a full size shot automatically? It would save you at least 4 steps there.

Post
#1016394
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jeebus said:

SilverWook said:

I didn’t think Brendan was that old. 😉

lol

I’ve heard conflicting reports about which movie this one’s based on; I’ve heard that it’s a reboot of the 1932 Boris Karloff Mummy, but I’ve also heard that it’s a reboot of the 1999 Stephen Sommers Mummy.

If Wikipedia’s to be believed, the 1999 Mummy was already a remake of the 1932 Mummy. So this new one may be a reboot of both.

Or maybe its a reboot of the 1959 Mummy.

It’s probably just Universal making a movie with the title “The Mummy” because they own the rights to it and are wanting to create a shared Universal Monsters universe (of which “Dracula Untold” was supposed to be the first).

Post
#1016148
Topic
Lurkers Name suggestions (Come On Lurkers JOIN IN!)
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

TV’s Frink said:

Dish Fo

If Fo is Dish, does that make you DirecTV’s Frink?

Dish was meant to be “this”. Fo was meant to be “for”. Done purposely to be taken out of context no doubt but not very solid “Lurker Name” material. I really wanted to laugh but it just isn’t that funny.

If I’m no longer allowed to post a picture of Ric Olie for the first two sentences and point out the irony of the second two sentences, even in off-topic, Jay might as well go ahead and ban me right now.

All I’m saying is it wasn’t funny. If it was an accidental typing that would have been hilarious. There are other lurker names that, due to the source mistakes, are down right rib-snapping funny. There is no reason I can’t say that it wasn’t funny, yeesh.

But there was no point in saying it wasn’t funny. We’re not rating names here.

suspiciouscoffee said:

TV’s Frink said:

Dish Fo

If Fo is Dish, does that make you DirecTV’s Frink?

This is funny though.