logo Sign In

doubleofive

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Mar-2008
Last activity
5-Dec-2025
Posts
11,912
Web Site
http://www.doubleofive.com

Post History

Post
#380118
Topic
"Bounty Hunter"?
Time

Vaderisnothayden said:

doubleofive said:

I did some research (I searched the Googles), and there was no front of card with Zuckuss or 4-LOM listed.  One of "IG-88 and Boba Fett", but the other card is just the line up of bounty hunters.  I couldn't find the back of the card though to see if it ran down the list on there.  Anyone have the cards handy?

So maybe the question is whether the card back listed the names and applied them in the same arrangement that was embraced 1989 onwards.

Yeah, that's what I'm getting at.  The problem is that we don't know where any of the companies got their name information.  Who's to say that Kenner didn't give the names to Topps, or if there was one master document that got sent to all of the companies that had that typo?

Post
#380114
Topic
"Bounty Hunter"?
Time

I did some research (I searched the Googles), and there was no front of card with Zuckuss or 4-LOM listed.  One of "IG-88 and Boba Fett", but the other card is just the line up of bounty hunters.  I couldn't find the back of the card though to see if it ran down the list on there.  Anyone have the cards handy?

Wookieepedia:

In the fifth draft of Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, Zuckuss's name is misspelled as "Tuckuss" and he is described as a "Human-type" bounty hunter. This error was also carried over into the novelization.

If we're making typos "canon", what's REALLY his name? ;-)

4-LOM isn't in the novelization, and it sounds like he's not mentioned outside of the toys until 1989, where the Galaxy Guide add-on to the RPG gives the correct names for him and Zuckuss.

It seems to me that the only source for their names were the toys (which were incorrect even in 1985) until 1989, where the names were "corrected" from that point on.

Post
#380108
Topic
Missed Musical Oppurtunity?
Time

TMBTM said:

ChainsawAsh said:

Oh, I definitely hear it.  The main melodies are exactly the same.  One is sung by a dark, creepy church choir, while the other is sung by overenthusiastic children.  Other than that, they're the same.  (The "celebration" music around the kids singing is quite different, but that's not what we're talking about.)

 

Damn, I hear it too now... NEVER tought of it. I guess I learned something today.

Wow.  I thought Anakin's theme having traces of the Imperial March gave me shivers.  That just blows my mind.

Post
#379958
Topic
Five live action shows
Time

"The Beginning" was the best part of any prequel DVD, I agree.  I was really disappointed that the other two films didn't continue in that fashion.  AotC had "From Puppets to Pixels" and "Films Aren't Released; They Escape", and RotS had "Within a Minute".  They were alright, but "The Beginning" was so all-encompassing, like "Empire of Dreams" without the ability to reflect on it.

Post
#379951
Topic
Signature update problem
Time

TV's Frink said:


The different editors confuse me, but aren't you supposed to do this (from the help page):

url=http://fanedits.com/]FanEdits.com[/url] — <a href="http://fanedits.com/" target="_blank" title="fanedits.com/">FanEdits.com</a>

actually you start with [url=.... but when I typed that, it showed up as a link like it is supposed to LOL.

This is a plain "Reply with Quote" using the plain text editor. It brings it back down the html instead of the [ url=

Post
#379922
Topic
Signature update problem
Time

Alright, this is related, so I'll throw it here. I've been trying to use the plain text editor all the time, but it doesn't seem to work properly. If I type the following in the plain text editor (which I'm using now), it shows up like this:

Sounds good DuTwan! Hopefully the lips and timing would match. Wish we could get <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitleijqobqvle9an?from=Main.BRIANBLESSED">BRIAN BLESSED</a> to redo the voice. ;-)

Post
#379815
Topic
Five live action shows
Time

TMBTM said:



captainsolo said:


Vaderisnothayden said:

On the other thread rcb linked to a rumor that a young Luke is going to appear on the show. Having seen a young Anakin and a young "Boba", I dread a young Luke. It'd be very unlikely to be anything but more crapping on Star Wars.


Please, no-enough with the young versions!

At least we never saw that awful young Han in Ep III.


Yeah, young Han solo was supposed to somehow help Yoda if I remember well...

Can you imagine that? It goes against everything Han Solo is as a character in ANH.

I am not Bashing Lucas all the time but the fact that this plot was taken seriously at some point is scary.

I heard that rumor and said immediately that if Han was in Episode III, I would walk out of the theater, sell or throw away my Episode I and II DVDs and deny the existence of the prequels. And that was before finding this site and finding out that people actually DO deny their existence!