doubleofive

No.

We know

Nevermind, misread the post

ZodaEX said:

none said:

Press release on TPM 2001 TV Premiere:
http://ncam.wgbh.org/about/news/pr_11202001
Aired with “R2-D2: Under the Dome”

They are hard to find as they are over shadowed by easier, equal or better, official home releases. Working backward, the 2005 broadcasts would all match the 2004 DVDs. A digital capture might be slightly better resolution, if one surfaces. The 2002 versions would match what was aired on USA Networks through the 1990s, based off the SE. TPM 2001 Premiere would have matched the DVD release which came out months before. Can’t recall off-hand if the ESB tv premiere has surfaced, but versions from the next year from Australia can be found on the 'spleen.

What constitutes a better home release?

The fact that the TV versions would be the most recent home video version broadcast over the air (or cable) then recorded on VHS, which would be a multi-generational loss of quality, when you could just find the equivalent home video release.

chyron8472 said:

With a version like King James, you have to read the passage and then stop now and then to say “in other words, it means [this]”. As opposed to the Bible straight up speaking for itself as to what it means and not having to retranslate archaic words.

One of my Bible College professors was really lazy with his correspondence courses. While the entire program was built on the NIV, this correspondence course I took was apparently something he found that used the KJV. A lot of the questions were asking what this archaic word means in this verse, when my NIV just had the modern word for it.

This movie… “Oops, we forgot to have someone operating the puppet when it’s 1/3 of the frame”. Maybe they filmed this when none of the puppeteers were on set, reshoots or something.

Yeah, resist that urge. It needed to be a much bigger part of the episode. Whenever Hera’s not on screen, all the other characters should be asking “Where’s Hera?”.

Hera cemented her role as my favorite pilot this week when she

aimed a U-Wing straight through a docking bay & went into hyperspace through it.

Add me to the chorus of saying how incredible these are.

I didn’t realize this page was for RotJR, I wondered which thread I was subscribed to that was debating love stories.

As for the lightsaber, of course Luke eventually picked it back up. He threw it away to show he wasn’t going to use it to kill his father. It’s still his lightsaber that he should have a spiritual attachment to (see TFA’s Family Saber).

Are people saying that it should be removed from the celebration? Can’t it just be implied he picked it back up while he was slowly dragging Vader’s body down to a shuttle bay?

at348 said:

correct tvfrink

Yes, if you had the preservation, you wouldn’t be asking for them.

Can’t you just watch the VHS versions and pretend they have commercial breaks?

at348 said:

why are they so hard to find?

Mocata said:

Unless you really want the commercial breaks or the VHS distortion from an analogue recording I don’t quite know what the question is.

There was never any reason to preserve them.

As far as I know, they’re identical to the home video releases as they use the same master files.

Fang Zei said:

Not that it really matters (as evidenced most recently by Thor: Ragnarok), but I wonder why Universal will always own the release rights to any future standalone Hulk film.

Did Marvel completely sell them off at some point?

Is it different from the situation with F4 where Fox needs to make another movie every several years?

I found this article on Hulk that should help:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2015/06/19/details-of-marvels-hulk-film-rights-fans-can-relax-about-sequel/

Looks like Universal lost the character by not making Ang Lee’s Hulk 2, but they managed to keep the right of first refusal for distribution, which means Disney would share some profits with Universal on MCU Hulk standalone movies.

As opposed to Fox, which keeps making F4 movies to keep the characters.

Do you think the TV version is different from the currently available official versions? Do you want something from the 80’s? It’s been shown on TV a lot.

yhwx said:

I don’t understand your point there.

But when will you get the point? I NEED TO KNOW NOW WHEN YOU’LL GET THE POINT.

Do you want to recreate how you saw them as a child?

I use Kindle because my wife can’t see how many Star Wars books I own.

HerekittykittyX said:

DarthXenu said:

I sent $20USD, receipt number was XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX

Remove the receipt number mods just keep I sent 20 dollars part

Are you… both people?

We’ll leave the conversion up to Ady & 1000 Challenge. 😉

We’re waiting on the go-ahead from Adywan.

I know it seems really important right now, but at 16 you have no idea what you want. You’re above normal in my book.

For some reason H40 being a thing makes me want to watch the other movies for the first time.

joefavs said:

So I just read the mouse droid story in FaCPoV. Is Tarkin canonically gay now? Was that nameless officer someone else like Motti or Tagge? It had to be someone that high up, and all signs seemed to point to Tarkin. I’m totally down with the recent push for inclusivity in SW media, but making the creepy mass murdering Nazi-inspired villain gay feels like kind of a retrograde trope.

The voice actor in the audiobook definitely does a Tarkin impression. And his room number is “G[rand]M[off]-1”. It is odd, trope-wise, and seems to have gone under the radar completely. There’s an article on the fact that Bea Arthur’s character from the HS is a lesbian, but nothing on Tarkin.

There’s way too many contradictions and just silly stories in the collection for it ALL to be canon.

Erikstormtrooper said:

Did we ever get a comparison gallery of all the changes to ESB-R?

Not yet.