doubleofive

Egon Spengler said:

I blame myself.

I was changing the subject to my problems. ;-)

I'm a slacker. If anyone can compile all that I'm missing on my list, that'd be fantastic.

Rancor lines were done in 2004, so I doubt there are any film prints of it.

TV's Frink said:

I have not seen the movie, and I'd appreciate it if you would start using semi-entertaining spoiler notices again.

By the way, I'm pretty sure when Adywan says "this year", he means next year. He will not be able to finish ESBR and start on RotJR in the week between Christmas and New Years.

;-)

UPDATE: CONFIRMED

Bingowings said:

Moth3r turn the cooling units back on!

Are there not enough new threads you couldn't use of of those? ;-)

So, Hostess is dead, huh?

There goes what was left of my childhood.

SomeBODY! I always get that wrong!

greenpenguino said:

I have to say, I'm really looking forward to seeing<span> Les Misérables on the big screen.

SOMEONE SET UP US THE BOMB.

SPOILERS ARE FOR BABIES

I didn't get the impression he wanted to watch the world burn. IF he didn't kill himself (which seems likely judging by how he nearly ended it), he would have been happy to keep selling secrets or selling his hacking skills to the highest bidders.

SPOILERS: THE OTHER WHITE MEAT

XHONZI WISHES HIS SPOILERS WERE THIS BIG

I guess Bond would have had to blow up the internet to stop Silva from messing something up. Oh wait, Brosnan-era is over.

END SPOILERS THAT WERE REALLY JUST SILLY SPECULATION

GIANT SPOILERS OF DEATH

But why would Bond be followed home if the bird was the target?

END SPOILERS OF DOOM

Brooks said:

Well, while we're at it, I was in one too.  :)

If anyone is interested, I've been on a couple podcasts to talk about Disney/Star Wars, Episode VII, and the future of fan edits.

http://trek.fm/tol1

http://maxhegel.podbean.com/2012/11/12/off-topic-320-thats-so-episode-vii/

Which small changes? Besides basic recompositing, none of them are "small".

Skyfall

I loved it. I was literally on the edge of my seat the entire movie, and my theater has new seats, so it was not due to the seats themselves. It was exciting, with just enough humor to get by without getting corny. The 50th anniversary shout outs cause some continuity issues, and I didn't care for having Craig's 3rd movie already talking like he's super-old and should retire. I did like how they touch on his childhood without spelling things out or having flashbacks. The action sequences were great, the villain was creepy if a little one-dimensional. I love the new Q, though we could use a little more gadgetry.

I don't understand why Bond sleeps with every woman he sees, I know it's "Bond", but his motivations are always so flimsy. [MINOR SPOILER]I really didn't like the he called the one lady out as being a child sex slave who is obviously still suffering from it, then sleeps with her an hour later.[/MINOR SPOILER]

I also think its safe to open with the gun-barrel now, it's been three movies, he's earned it.

I'm glad there's going to be more, though I do hope for just a smidge more gadget. It doesn't have to be super realistic.

006/007

KoolGuy7 said:

Wait Despecialized TPM? What's wrong with it?

Personally, I think its more of a bombardment shield, so it only points up.

Also check out my Visual Comparison series here: http://picasaweb.google.com/doubleofive

How did this come out on Kindle and no one mentioned it?!

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-Star-Wars-ebook/dp/B008BM7M3C/

Oh, there he is. I thought a few of them looked familiar.

*keeps looking*

Is that Garrett Wang?

The watermark was distracting me, its the guests of a con. I see now.

sean wookie said:

doubleofive said:

 

sean wookie said:

I never thought I would be 2 degrees from Doug Walker.

So you're not in this picture?

 

2 degrees as in the 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon-wise.