It doesn't sound like it's Star Wars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Marietta
Unless it's related to "Star Wars"
That looks great! I've never liked how crappy the Earth looks in that shot, but that would be a lot of roto work to cut out the drydock.
I've seen some CG projects of someone redoing that entire scene, I wonder if you'd be interested in talking to them?
TV's Frink said:
The Great Muppet Caper. Re-watching in order to collect Fozzie lines for ridiculous re-purposing.
Had my own Other Marvel Movies double feature last night.
The Amazing Spider-Man
About what I expected from hearing about it for the last couple years. Long, surprisingly boring at times, very unfocused. I appreciate them not immediately jumping into Norman Osborne or the Daily Bugle.
The Wolverine
Now this movie I enjoyed a lot. Even when it was slow, it was trying to tell a story of Logan coming to grips of his new reality, post-X3. The action was actiony, I liked it.
That's pretty fantastic!FrankT said:
At one point I thought it'd be cool to see the trailer for the '97 SE remade as one for Revisited. So I gave it a go:
http://vimeo.com/87909979
..it's definitely NOT perfect. Not all of the resources I needed were immediately available, but - it's kinda close.
The originals were presented in 1.33, but the Blus are reformatted into 1.78. Same with Seinfeld. (Cheers isn't available on Blu yet, but HDTV reruns are presented at 1.78)_,,,^..^,,,_ said:
If you have That 70's Show Season 1, you should include the Blu-rays of Friends and Cheers which do the same.
Please be more specific...
Figures.TV's Frink said:
Not a fan of BR or BSG.
I knew we'd come up with it before, I just wanted to reiterate it here.Bingowings said:
Memories.
Well done!
If you have That 70's Show Season 1, you should include the Blu-rays of Friends and Cheers which do the same.
Enchanted has a variable AR? I never noticed...
I'd love to have a shot of Edward James Olmos from Blade Runner in the Endor battle, overdubbed with a "so say we all!" from BSG, in response to some order.
Dammit Muddy, you're not supposed to post images from the workprint! ;-)muddyknees2000 said:
BlueCardinal said:
After all, the huge bodies of those AT-AT's wouldn't just be used for carrying refreshments.
WRONG!
http://laughingsquid.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/8895519208_f3ebb6bd55_z.jpg
So did I.TV's Frink said:
I stopped reading at Chewbacca = Jar Jar.
Un-released deleted scenes that never even made it to the DVDs were either destroyed or are sitting in a box on a shelf somewhere. As for the UK versions of FC having additional scenes, that's a little more interesting, as maybe a print could be found with them intact.
Any UKers who can confirm these, or are these Trek equivalents to Luke missing his first throw?
I'm pretty sure it's just the 77 version.bkev said:
Adywan: It's been awhile, but I think he made some sort of hybrid noise; however, it's also possible he just put the 77 one back in. Unless I'm just making this up, my preferred version.
I couldn't get on from 5:25 to 10:25 EST this morning. Facebook confirms it wasn't just me.
Maybe the 16:9 "restoration" of the IMAX scenes should be moved into a new thread, to keep the bonus feature stuff at the center of this thread.
THANK YOU. I don't understand kids nowadays.DuracellEnergizer said:
It takes more effort to spell horribly than it does to spell correctly.
I feel like this is a honey trap, and once people start posting in here, we're going to catch it on fire to get rid of the evil.
I've never been impressed with the quality of cable VOD, I wonder how much is the capture and how much they just compressed it for streaming.eldiablosuizo said:
Alright, well, I took a look at the capture and there was a LOT of bad artifacting. Is there anyway we can get someone else to capture the footage from Epix VOD? I have no capability, but I will edit it.
Someone wants to make an Inception board game.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/455211959/inceptor-the-game-of-your-dreams
We need to make sure this happens.
Looks good. How do the reverse angles and close ups look?
PRESERVE ALL THE THINGS!eldiablosuizo said:
doubleofive said:
PDB said:
Ok I did a quick-and-dirty capture of EPIX's VOD presentation this morning and here are the results.
...
I made a 14GB MKV (1080i/ac3) of the capture.
I wonder how well just using that capture to fill in the rest of the frame for the IMAX shots would work, or using it to fill in the aforementioned missing frames/sections of the screen that have BTS stuff in the commentary.
I'm going to be working on that tonight for sure. It's going to help so much. Even if it's a poor bitrate, we only need a tiny amount of image to cover up the BTS stuff, so hopefully it would all balance out.
All this work for a terrible movie. I love it.
Apparently EPIX is showing Star Trek Into Darkness in 16:9 with the IMAX shots expanded and the standard shots cropped. Could be useful in a preservation.
I wonder how well just using that capture to fill in the rest of the frame for the IMAX shots would work, or using it to fill in the aforementioned missing frames/sections of the screen that have BTS stuff in the commentary.PDB said:
Ok I did a quick-and-dirty capture of EPIX's VOD presentation this morning and here are the results.
...
I made a 14GB MKV (1080i/ac3) of the capture.
I knew mumbles would have some insights. I feel like a Pokemon master, "I CHOOSE YOU!"
We've half joked about starting a podcast on aspect ratios.