logo Sign In

doubleofive

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Mar-2008
Last activity
9-Sep-2025
Posts
11,901
Web Site
http://www.doubleofive.com

Post History

Post
#717508
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Beatleboy99 said:



yoda-sama said:

Wasn't Episode 1 the last Star Wars shot on film (until ep 7), with Episodes 2 and 3 quite famously being all digital?  In that case, I don't think we should be concerned about any conspicuous absence of Episodes 2 and 3 from rumors of 4K restorations (and if they didn't do it for Episode 1 for its 3D release, I don't think anyone plans to bother doing much further with that one).


 Right. I thought all movies being theatrically presented needed to be in 4k and wasn't thinking about the original runs of Clones and Sith.
There's still a lot of 2k out there.

Post
#716710
Topic
All Things Star Trek
Time

DrCrowTStarwars said:


As for Vic he had maybe 15 minutes and two episodes out of two seasons on DS9 and he was a good character played by an actor who could sing?!  I mean it may be the only time in Tv history a character who was a singer was played by an actor who could sing and if you want to understand why fans like myself love him then take a look at this.  It's one of my favorite episodes of Star Trek fullstop and and I think this review says it all.
"It's Only A Paper Moon" is your favorite episode of Trek? I don't even know what to say to that.

Post
#716635
Topic
24 Live another day
Time

It's a great ending of the season/closing of the series. And if they decide to bring him back, they could have the next president (Aaron Pierce?) negotiate for his release or Jack breaks out for some reason. I like it better than S8's ending, with Jack just running off.

I love that Jack got to take down 20 more people, and a couple in non-traditional ways. Nothing can beat "bring me a hacksaw" or that time he threw a screwdriver into a guy's chest then hit him with a plank.

Post
#716378
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

NeverarGreat said:



AntcuFaalb said:


NeverarGreat said:

That's my vote. My tickets to the screening in Atlanta have already been refunded though.


NOOOOOO! You must go! :-(


All sold out. Besides, six hours is quite a drive for the SE. I'm sure we can find someone who has tickets who is obsessive enough to recognize what went into its making.
We need to find someone BEFORE they go so they're looking for differences......

Post
#716367
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

So, possibilities:

A. Brand new scan of the ON, with all original optical effects recomposited. (the original plan for the SE; unlikely due to having to find every element again)
B. Scan of '97 SE, with '11 effects redone in 4k. (making a 4k version of the Blu-ray, perhaps for theatrical/3D viewing; likely due to the SE being "George's vision")
C. Scan of '97 SE, replacing the CG additions with original optical effects. (making a mostly-despecialized edition/original plan for the SE; possible because it's "good enough" for most purists)
D. Scan of '97 SE, to have a 4k version of the '97 SE. (neat for preservation of a lot of people's first theatrical experience of Star Wars; doubtful because '97 Jabba should not be seen by human eyes ever again)

What else do we have?

Post
#716348
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

adywan said:


It's the 1997 SE version. You can tell by the lightsabers. Looks like they were using that version ready for the 3D releases. They would probably just have inserted the 2004/11 changes into the new 4k scan from the master they had.
Interesting, but their "restoration" video shows the same damage to the negative that they fixed already in 1997, right?

Man, if they make a 97/11 hybrid in 4k, that's just more stuff for us to find in the complete comparison. "They changed this in 04/11, but changed it back to the 97 version when they did the 15." *head explodes*

Post
#716308
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Cobra Kai said:

Perhaps not. I hope you're right.  But this also would have been before the Disney purchase was finalized if that staffers resume is accurate.  I have a hard time believing Lucasfilm would have been working on an OUT restoration at that time, while GL was technically still running the show.
Perhaps as a show of good faith to Disney, LFL started having it restored?

Post
#716295
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

AntcuFaalb said:



timdiggerm said:

Sorry, 005, which is which?


I think it's: RMW/GOUT/Blu-ray.
Exactly. The colors are different, the flashes look like what the GOUT might look like if it wasn't overblown. Shot 2 is the most telling, the flash is green in the SE and doesn't go as high on Vader's shoulder. I don't know guys....

And I highly doubt they re-did the SE's in 4k from scratch. That's them going back to each original element and the original negative AGAIN, scanning them AGAIN, redoing all of the CG AGAIN.

Post
#716279
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time


Cobra Kai said:
That staffer's resume indicates that she worked on it starting in september of 2012.  If that's the case, then I bet this was just a new SE master for the 3d releases that were eventually cancelled.
Judging by the changes made to the Blu-ray, it's my opinion that we got the 2D versions of what would have been released in 3D. Besides, why would they need to do "Restoration, Mapping, and Dirt Picking" the already way too clean 1080p Blu-ray masters in 4k?

Post
#715783
Topic
All Things Star Trek
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:


I heard that J. Michael Straczynski pitched the idea for a reboot of TOS to Paramount some years back, and I can't help but wonder how it would have turned out if they had gone through with making it*.

 

*Still probably better than everything I've read about Abramstrek. 
Funny you should mention that:

http://trek-fm.squarespace.com/standard-orbit/38

Here's the pitch if you want to check it out.

http://bztv.typepad.com/newsviews/files/ST2004Reboot.pdf