logo Sign In

darth_ender

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Apr-2011
Last activity
28-Dec-2025
Posts
8,815

Post History

Post
#696738
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

Well, sounds like a busy week.  All that on top of school and Air Cadets, I'm sure you've been busy.  Hange in there :)

I can't help but wonder if you'd like to take back that last move.  It's certainly not the end of the world, but it looks like it might be an early mistake, and I'm sure you'd rather start off on the right foot.  FSx17+B.

Post
#696706
Topic
All Things Star Trek
Time

My brother once took a class on Alfred Hitchcock movies where they would watch the film, then analyze the symbolism and messages of his films.  I was in high school at the time, but I visited my brother (who was attending a ways away from home) and attended a class with him.  I thought it was brilliant.  This Star Trek thing would be even more fun!  I love Star Trek!  And I'm with you Sadako, TNG is my fave.

Post
#696381
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

I'm going to suggest moving the FS back to their old starting squares right behind the geese (it's funny, but geese sounds wrong when one is simply referring to shogi pieces).  My reason for this is because the silver cannon actually does a good job of getting in the way of the flying swallow.  If you wish to bring the cannon forward, it takes several moves and likely exposing it to early attacks if you want to simultaneously bring the swallow out.  And if you wish to bring the swallow out earlier, you have to retreat the silver cannon, making it take longer for it to be effective.  As the two strongest pieces in the game, I think they do a good job in that position interfering with each other and preventing a player from making too much use of them too early.  I might be wrong, but see what you think.  I want to read your thoughts before my next move.

Post
#696248
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

I think I may agree.  It means fewer pieces see the light of day, but I think it's better that way.  A weaker game  is usually a longer game with more strategic thinking involved.  I could not have checkmated you on this last move if I could only drop the goose, for instance.

I also am thinking that it might be better to switch the values of the reverse chariot/silver cannon.  I have hardly used the cannon since our first game, yet the chariot has actually proved very powerful in the right circumstances.  Switching the two might force more cannon usage and give the piece the opportunity to get closer to the front lines in the early game (since the chariot can't get to the front till captured and dropped, except in very rare circumstances when all pieces in front of it are captured.  So I think we should make that change and the drop and demoted value, and I think we'll be good.  Do you think we should still have alternating promotions/demotions, or shoudl we go back to permanent promotions?  I think I like the alternating better, but I want to know what you think.

Post
#696211
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

Sometimes I don't see the obvious mating possibilities until I suddenly pull a checkmate on you.  I shouldn't have even bothered with the previous warning.  Cm*31 mate.  So I'm thinking it might be best to let you go back to before you dropped your tile general (I'm not sure if you were saying you didn't want to take that back or if you jokingly didn't want to take back you cavalryman move).  In either case, I hope you will go back and try to defend yourself.

Post
#696065
Topic
The Conspiracy Theories Thread(was: 911 Conspiracy theories)
Time

Bingowings said:

As for not being sure what I'm referring to ask a Mormon. A physical being on another planet would match most people's definition of an extraterrestrial intelligence.

 Ah, I see what you are referring to.  Yes, to most God is an ethereal everywhere yet no where being, which is far more logical I suppose ;)  Thanks for including the link, as it explains my position so well I need not repeat it.  God lives somewhere.  Heaven is not on a cloud.  Weird, huh? (In other words, I'll never understand why non-Mormons try to portray it as weird, since no other explanation makes sense--it is the logical conclusion)

I am fascinated by your preoccupation with Kolob.  It's a matter that hardly is brought up.  I can't say I've heard the term used even once in the past several years in church.  It's not even where God resides but rather "nearest to".  I take it to be a more symbolic than literal meaning, though I'm not sure if that's a correct interpretation or not.

Post
#696017
Topic
The Conspiracy Theories Thread(was: 911 Conspiracy theories)
Time

^Indeed.  Though I wonder what on earth you are talking about here:

Bingowings said:

The Mormon churches are pretty much reliant on belief on other planets for their canonical narrative.

I am unsure of what you are referring to here.  We do believe that God has created life elsewhere, but it is hardly significant to our doctrine or canonical narrative.  If we were to change that one little item, it would not alter our manner of worship or any other aspect of our religious practice.

God isn't needed to create intelligent life any more than you need a carpenter to make a soft place to sit in a field (indeed some of the synthetic chairs on local buses are much filthier than a moss covered log or a grassy knoll).

 You oversimplify a bit.  Even non-believing scientists acknowledge that even under the rare perfect circumstances that our earth finds itself in, life, especially sentient life, are hardly inevitable.  Only the vastness of our universe allows for those rare opportunities to arise in a spontaneous theory, and even then one cannot help but wonder how the laws that led to such creation came to exist.

But it's all pretty crazy and asinine anyway.