logo Sign In

darth_ender

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Apr-2011
Last activity
28-Dec-2025
Posts
8,815

Post History

Post
#697972
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

hairy_hen said:

Uh, do you really not understand that you can hate a sin and not the sinner?

I 'understand' that this is the most pathetic and laughable excuse for bigotry I've ever heard.  If you can't hear the hypocrisy behind it, then you fail at life.

Take the judgemental bullsh!t somewhere else.  People with actual intelligence and compassion have no use for this sort of garbage, which is completely antithetical to anything that remotely resembles what Christ ever really said, or meant.

I have no patience for this kind of rubbish, and am not interested in debating it as if it were a point of view worth granting any consideration to at all.  Don't let the door hit your @$$ on the way out.

 I have no patience for rubbish that addresses nothing except others' unwillingness to hear another POV.  You are free to disagree with anyone who opposes homosexuality.  You may make your point with force.  But I am sick to death of myself and others being called hateful for often doing more loving things than the peace-loving hippies.  I have dear friends who are gay.  Nothing has broken my heart more than learning of the mistreatment of gays throughout history and how social stigma even in our present world has led to suicides.  I hug gay friends and have discussions about their significant others.  And yet, for religious reasons, I believe homosexual behavior to be wrong.  Guess what?  I find nearly everyone on this board to be sinful, openly engaging in sexual acts outside of marriage.  I believe it is wrong.  Guess what else?  I don't judge you all for it.  I don't condemn you for it.  I don't hate you for it.  I would never do it and believe you shouldn't either, but you know, that's life.  Labeling someone as hateful over this sort of thing is the true hypocrisy.  Yes, there are many people who are hateful, far too many, maybe even a majority of those who oppose homosexuality.  But there are many good, kind-hearted people, perhaps people who simply don't understand, people who lack perspective.  And there are people who try to do as Christ did.  "Neither do I condemn thee.  Go and sin no more."  Clearly loving the sinner, while in the same breath, renouncing the sin.

Post
#697967
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Bingowings said:

The bottom line is Christians should follow Christ as He is supposed to be the first and final word on the whole creation thing.

Christians do believe that Paul was an apostle and messsenger of Jesus Christ, who did discuss homosexuality.

He never mentioned homosexuality, (he mentioned taxes and the sabbath but never homosexuality) the only bits of the Bible that do, also come under the same banner as a lot of really bizarre and vile decrees apparently from His Father who is also Him.

Paul is not God the Father.

Christ never said hate the sin. He said acknowledge and repent your own faults and leave the faults of others to themselves and their creator.

He said many things that seem to teach that we are commanded to hate sin and encourage others to do the same.  John 7:24.  John 2:13-16.  Paul stated things more directly.  Romans 12:9.  1 Thessalonians 5:22.  How many times did Jesus pronounce woes upon scribes, Pharisees, and hypocrites?  It was not out of hate for those individuals, but out of anger at their sins, including arrogance, self-righteousness, and lack of concern for others.  Jesus' council not to throw a stone at the women did not mean her behavior was acceptable or none of their business.  It was teaching a new, higher law that our love of the sinner outweighs the sin, but not that the sin is acceptable.

Christ defended the woman caught in adultery and defended her with a call for her accusers to see their own faults before hers.

So the whole campaigning against homosexuality schtick (and there is a lot of it about in the Christian world) is essentially antiChristian.

Pagans like myself are not prohibited in the same way as true Christians.

We can point the finger in either direction but if enough Christians were to live by the instruction of Jesus and try and straighten themselves out first you may take some us along by example.

 I don't say this to condemn.  I'm sure I'll be cast as a "hater" as well, and everything that I say and do is utter hatred (even if my views are far more tolerant of different behaviors and opinions than those who may call me such), but I wish to point out that your definition of Christianity is not exactly accurate, or at the very least is simply another of many interpretations with evidence that counters it.

Post
#697732
Topic
Who'd like to try a chess variant? Now playing Xiang Qi, a.k.a. Chinese chess
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

Alright, I'm ready for Self-eliminator Chess if you are. It's funny, this thread is the fourth result in a Google search for "Self-eliminator Chess" and first in a search for "Self-eliminator Chess download". I guess it isn't a very common variant. :)

 No, I suppose not, which is striking to me, as it was one of my earliest ideas when I first started coming up with chess variants in 9th grade.

Okay, so obviously I'm busy lately.  But I'll make a move now.

d4

Post
#697730
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

I'm working on an expanded version of Ito Shogi (if it can still be called that) which is currently 3x34 squares. I am combining pieces' moves from Ito Shogi with their original ones and I wanted to ask you if you thought that was a bad idea or not. It helps facilitate forward movement (especially with pieces like the bishop), but it might be making things too complicated or some pieces too powerful.

Thoughts? Other suggestions for the set-up of the game are also welcome.

 I did miss this.  I had the thread open for some time but hadn't been able to move and hadn't refreshed it.  It sounds like you are working on a new game, which is fine with me.  I'd recommend giving it a new name and taking credit for it yourself, but I wouldn't mind some credit as an inspiration.  If it is 3x34, it certainly isn't Ito Shogi, as it is now a narrow 2D game.  Ito Shogi's foremost goal was to be a playable 1D game.

As for the ideas themselves, I prefer a game of greater nuance, meaning that I like games with limited moves that mostly require cooperation between pieces.  I don't much care for a hero piece that can do everything on its own.  Even in chess, a queen cannot checkmate a king alone.  In chu shogi, the lion was capable of checkmate on its own, but such would be difficult to achieve given the number of available pieces one could call upon to defend the king.  The lion though powerful, is still very short ranged, giving it some appropriate limits and keeping it from being invulnerable.  I was actually surprised at its limitations when we played.  All this adds up to me being worried about your game having too many powerful pieces.  I could be wrong, and the thing about so many powerful pieces is that they offset each other.  But still, I can't help but worry.  A single piece gained gives a tremendous advantage to one player.  But give it a try.  Theorizing about it never is quite equal to actually trying it out.  You may find that it works out brilliantly!

And P-8f

Post
#697715
Topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Time

Well, I admitted that I could easily be wrong for the very reasons you mentioned.  But if I am right, it might give folks a little more sympathy for Warbler, as I feel that people are unnecessarily harsh on him.  Even if he merits no such diagnosis, he clearly struggles with certain aspects of humor, and has a unique personality on this board.  It seems to me that implicitly calling him a passive aggressive paranoiac is the weightier sin, no?

Post
#697712
Topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Time

It's a very recent change, just since the DSM-5 came out last year.  In this case it is mostly just a change in terminology, and certainly not binding.

http://www.autismspeaks.org/dsm-5/faq#changes

What I mean about not binding is that if identity includes Aspergers, a person is free to continue using the term without being incorrect.  It's probably more just an attempt to phase it out and user a broader definition for the whole autism spectrum.

BTW, my last long response wasn't the promised long response.  I haven't gotten to it yet.

Post
#697698
Topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Time

Bingowings said:

Well yeah but they were in response to other posts in other threads where they were sort of originally on topic.

Thus exposing the pointless nature of this thread.

Homosexuality in of itself is hardly worth talking about.

Obviously there is a great divergence of opinion, and it was consuming many other threads even when this thread was first started, making this thread anything but pointless, as all other threads could be freed up.

Men and women of the same gender being drawn to each other with an end to getting theirs away with each other.

All the other talk has been about 'traditionalists' wanting to perpetuate some form of prejudice.

We don't have a thread of colour or a female thread for much the same reason.

There isn't much to having darker than Caucasian skin but you can write volumes about the prejudices it's evoked with a bit of assistance from interpretations of scripture.

I think having a thread about racism would actually be valuable for discussion, especially if such a discussion took off elsewhere.  Racism is still quite extant, and its nature (and the subsequent abuse of the race card, the pros and cons of affirmative action, etc.) are actually quite valuable for discussion.  I don't know why you think it's not worth talking about.  I've seen such threads in other forums' Off Topic sections..

Similarly we don't have a passive aggressive paranoiac's thread.

 I want to address something, not just to you, but to everyone.  What I am about to say could hurt feelings permanently, but I think it's important to point out.  I have a suspicion that Warbler has an autism-spectrum disorder, perhaps what was until recently called Asperger's .  I got this list from a website:

ASPERGERS: CLINICAL FEATURES

One of the primary features of Aspergers is their passion for favorite topics or special interests. Some of these areas include:

• astronomy
• dinosaurs
• extraterrestrials
• geography
• history 
• machines or machinery
• maps
• math
• metereology
• music
• reading 
• science
• social studies
• space travel
• trains
• weather

I might suggest other topics like politics or sports.


Socialization deficits—

• Are inflexible and incapable of coping with change
...
• Difficulties making social connections
• Easily stressed and emotionally vulnerable
• Frequently described as “odd” or selfish
• Highly frustrated by their social awkwardness/alienation
• Lack effective interaction skills — not desire
• Lack understanding of human relations and rules of social convention
• Naïve and lack common sense
...
• Seldom interested in other's interests/concerns
• Unable to “read” others' needs and perspectives
• Unable to appropriately respond to social cues

How often have members here laughed at Warbler's inability to get an obvious joke or his taking things too literally or personally?


Social rejection of Aspergers kids—

Because of their social ineptness ASPERGERS kids are often the focus of bullying, scape-goating, hazing and teasing. This often leads to anxiety, feelings of rejection, depression and withdrawal.

...

For some teenagers, computers are an alternative from stressful social situations. Computers also provide a more linear, modulated form of socialization that ASPERGERS kids are more skilled and comfortable at handling. Since many ASPERGERS kids become very computer proficient, they become valuable resources to their peers. It also provides a media for social interaction in which they can feel competent and valued. 

...

Use of Language—

• Concrete language rather than abstract
• Difficulty understanding humor
...
• Typically revert to favorite topic area 

...
• Weak pragmatic-conversational-skills

TEACHING STRESS REDUCTION SKILLS—

AS kids are:

• are often anxious and worrisome
• easily overwhelmed 
• highly sensitive 
• often engage in rituals

I got these from this site.  I removed what I thought was not applicable in Warbler's case or was not available just by reading his computer posts.  You can see the whole list at the link.

I feel Warbler fits many of these criteria and have thought so for some time.  I didn't ever point it out because of my fear of hurting him and because I could easily be incorrect, as it's hard to judge a person by computer posts alone.  But I feel the need to point it out now as he is so often the subject of negative humor, yea, even what some might call prejudice.  Folks judge him without truly knowing him.  For this reason I again resort to this quote:

Similarly we don't have a passive aggressive paranoiac's thread. 

Since this quote is obviously referring to Warbler, let me again say that perhaps it is not a bad idea to have a thread devoted to the prejudices, bigotry, and mistreatment directed at those who have emotional, psychological, or personality disorders.  They too are victims, often completely without recognition.  I want everyone to consider just perhaps how hypocritical they may have been in their treatment of others, including Warbler, without understanding the hardships many of them go through.

Post
#697630
Topic
How about a game of Japanese Chess, i.e. Shogi? Now playing Shogi4
Time

No, you've fallen for no trap.  I wasn't looking when I made my move.  For some reason I thought I was getting the pawn next to it, at least when I first thought of the move.  Stupid thing is when I typed it, I looked at it correctly and still didn't catch it.  oh well.

P-8e

I guess you can see how often I post based on super quick glances lately.  It has been hurting me in all my games.

Post
#697593
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

I don't think it's you defending your point of view that is offending him or Warbler (or in the past me).  I think it's that clarified responses are dismissed and the offending statements always acting as the actual representative view in your mind that bugs them (and was the cause of discord between us in our recent tiff).  I actually enjoy our discussions and am always interested in your point of view.  It's when I (and likely others) feel that you are refusing to see ours clearly that I/we get irritated.  I really hope this does not cause another argument between us because I much prefer meaningful dialogue.