dahmage

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

I’m sleepy drunk

I tend to be a happy drunk, though on occasion, I’ve been a sad drunk.

I’m hilarious drunk, if you ask me.

Please stop posting in this thread. You can have the rest of the forum.

LordZerome1080 said:

I miss them as well

Do you though?

Drinking Jamison on the rocks in rememberence of my homies, Possesered and TVs Fradink.

dahmage said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I thought the visuals were decent but felt that the acting from Ryan Gooseling a bit awkward

Wtf?

Spell his name better next time

Please get off of Gooseling’s duck.

Quack (aka meow)

Duck off you fowl avian

DuracellEnergizer said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I thought the visuals were decent but felt that the acting from Ryan Gooseling a bit awkward

Wtf?

Spell his name better next time

Please get off of Gooseling’s duck.

Quack (aka meow)

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I agree it was very interesting the perspective that they put on the film having it all from Neil’s perspective.I didn’t know much about this going into it other than that I wanted to watch it, so I wasn’t expecting this to all follow his life. But man, really well done and also very emotionally strong.

ray_afraid said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I thought the visuals were decent but felt that the acting from Ryan Gooseling a bit awkward

Ha! Weird.

It’s hilarious

LordZerome1080 said:

dahmage said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I thought the visuals were decent but felt that the acting from Ryan Gooseling a bit awkward

Wtf?

Spell his name better next time

LordZerome1080 said:

Tobar said:

First Man (2018)

Gorgeously shot film, should win an Oscar for that alone. An interesting character study of Neil Armstrong.

I thought the visuals were decent but felt that the acting from Ryan Gooseling a bit awkward

nl0428 said:

The truth is is that the sequel trilogy, nor any of the Star Wars content put out by Disney started toxicity. It began with fanbase. The fanbase who bullied Jake Lloyd, Hayden Christensen, Ashley Eckstein, Daisy Ridley, John Boyega and Kelly Marie Tran. It’s okay to not like the new movies, but there is no reason to bully and harass those who like the new content, as well as people involved in the creation of it. If you don’t like the new movies put out by Disney, then stop going to see them. Plain and simple. There is no reason to attack those with differing opinions. I’m sorry that anyone here is not a fan of The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi, but I am. There is no reason to attack someone who likes something that you do not like. I am not planning on going to Star Wars Celebration mainly because of the toxic fanbase. I don’t want to go there to be bullied, whether it be verbally or physically. I am not a sports fan, but I don’t attack anyone who likes football, basketball, etc. By doing that, it makes yourself look like a hateful person that nobody wants to be around. That is something I or anyone else out there does not want to become.

Yes.

DominicCobb said:

At this point I feel like this show is being made specifically for me:
https://deadline.com/2018/10/the-twilight-zone-adds-adam-scott-for-nightmare-at-30000-feet-episode-1202489947/

Nice. Shame it is on CBS all access…

I agree. I am very curious to hear the details about exactly what was going on, the news so far has been vary vague (And understandably so).

One Person In Custody In Suspicious Package Case After More Devices Found

paja said:

That is monstrous!

Mway1 said:

On binsearch the 4k version is showing as 14.21gb and the 1080p as 48.61gb… That can’t be right, can it?

it isn’t fully up yet.

Verboten said:

Now onto the apparently long wait for 4K80.

A good carbon freeze should do the trick

a_o said:

i think a DNR + shot by shot regrade would be awesome. if it could approach the gamma, contrast and saturation of the GOUT or JSC i’d

4k83
https://imgur.com/ZxgVafF

DeEd 2.5
https://imgur.com/zTv9xdo

bd (lol)
https://imgur.com/r0n1hpH

use http://www.framecompare.com/, easier to see the difference all at once

I miss that cat.

LordZerome1080 said:

why is your sig getting bigger? WTF? 😛.

your phone is in your face?

yeah, NO

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Audio Information
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Track 01.............: 2.0 DTS-MA (1983 35mm Optical Audio (from this print)) Eng
Track 02.............: 5.1 DTS-MA (5.1 mix 2018 version (new for 4K83)) Eng
Track 03.............: 2.0 AC3 (1993 LaserDisc audio (new for 4K83)) Eng
Track 04.............: 3.0 AC3 (1993 LaserDisc audio Commentary (new for 4K83)) Eng

Audio Track 1 is the stereo optical audio extracted from our primary 35mm print using a
   35mm optical reader and Dolby decoder. Mastering by schorman.
Audio Track 2 is a new 5.1 audio track, mastered for this release. Mastering by hairy_hen.
   This 5.1 mix is only suited for 5.1 systems. For 2.0 systems use one of the stereo
   tracks for greater clarity.
Audio Track 3 is the 1993 LaserDisc stereo audio. Mastering by schorman.
Audio Track 4 is the 1993 LaserDisc audio commentary. Mastering by schorman.

Some alternate audio is provided in an Alternate Audio folder for you to mux in as
desired.

All audio provided is synced to 4K83. Thank you hairy_hen and schorman.

Track 03 is probably the ‘highest’ quality, but Track 01 is very high quality as well, it only has a few audio glitches.

schorman said:

As far as the 35mm optical track, the recording was excellent as far as sync. It turned out to have only a single glitch across the seven reels of the film, a single repeated frame worth of audio at about 1:08:12.

LordZerome1080 said:

Why were Possessed and Collipso banned? I understand Frink’s I just don’t understand why the other two were.

Logic would dictate that you got that backwards. but this has been dealt with a lot over the past few days. catch up on some threads and you will probably be able to read to find the answers you seek. no need to bring it up again.

CatBus said:

I had no idea the scale of Emojigeddon. Look carefully at that post, oojason. It’s an italicized smiley. I’m getting back in bed. Maybe Tuesday will be better.

😄

Is using an HDR monitor really the best way to color correct non-HDR sources? I fully admit i have no idea, but it sounds to me like maybe you shouldn’t be using that as a color correction monitor.