dahmage

This conversation needs to leave this thread and go to off topic.

or

Get off my lawn!

😃

SnooPac said:

dahmage said:

Well, SnooPac do you mind if i replace your upload with the fixed file or do you want to fix it? good news is it should only require minor download to sync the changes.

Go ahead. I think it will just be 1 or 2 torrent segments that are bad. Would be nice if you have the ability to diff. I’m curious if its just a few bytes that are bad or something more significant. Even if its just 1%, 1% of that many GB could still be a lot. Probably best to keep file name the same so torrent clients just auto “overwrite” my file and complete the few missing bad bytes? Can also delete the first torrent.

Actually, why don’t you just edit your local file using a hex editor. See my previous post for the bytes to change. It is really very minor. Save it and run some checksums, it should match what Williarob posted at that point. THen you can re-upload the torrent. I think it will just be too confusing if i upload a new one, might be less so if you do?

SnooPac said:

Sorry don’t have time to read all these messages (will eventually) but I’ll try to quickly answer a few.

Chewtobacca said:

This happens every time someone extracts the ISO. Why extract it? Why do anything to it?

By “extracted”, its meant extracted from rar to iso. Iso not modified (intentionally).
And this is a rule on myspleen that the rars need to be extracted.

dahmage said:

Well, SnooPac do you mind if i replace your upload with the fixed file or do you want to fix it? good news is it should only require minor download to sync the changes.

Go ahead. I think it will just be 1 or 2 torrent segments that are bad. Would be nice if you have the ability to diff. I’m curious if its just a few bytes that are bad or something more significant. Even if its just 1%, 1% of that many GB could still be a lot. Probably best to keep file name the same so torrent clients just auto “overwrite” my file and complete the few missing bad bytes? Can also delete the first torrent.

Also I would have tried to confirm the hash after extracting, but I couldn’t find it. Sorry all, my bad.

Yeah, as a community we need to get in a better habit of sharing hashes/checksums for everything…

I will create a new torrent, keeping the exact same directory and file structure that you had. I will try to make it clear (at least for the time-being) that this is a updated/fixed torrent, and if you just point it at your existing download it will only need to change one piece (2mb). I will let you know when it is ready to go.

I did a binary diff: but i am not exactly sure what it means. Anyone who knows the UDF 2.5 spec better than me might be able to decipher it.

dahmage said:

Yep, the myspeen torrent probably modified your file.

Here is difference i have found so far:

a.b.starwars blocks 20004-20078:
CA 00 01 00 D2 2D 7E 00 40 00 00 00 10 1F E0 07 06 0C 0E 29 29 3C 50 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 2E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C0 51 2C 01 A0 00 00 00 00 2A 49 6D 67 42 75 72 6E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Ê…Ò-~.@…à…))<P…~…ÀQ,. …*ImgBurn…

myspleen blocks 20004-20078:
53 00 01 00 D0 B8 7E 00 40 00 00 00 10 1F E0 07 06 0D 09 32 06 07 4B 21 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 2E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C0 51 2C 01 A0 00 00 00 00 2A 49 6D 67 42 75 72 6E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04

S…и~.@…à…2…K!..~…ÀQ,. …*ImgBurn…

Yeah,

i really don’t know what is best at this point, a new torrent is sure to confuse. but the sooner it gets corrected, the better.

It is only one piece that would need to be downloaded if you download to the same file (2 MB)

After looking at the binary diff, all the changes seem to be in the file header, it looks like the author or maybe an authoring date got changed? but How?

yoda-sama said:

pittrek said:

Now this is fascinating…

I downloaded the ISO from usenet and my SHA checksum is 9b5df42aa7a7d346711dd969f8650f18b6d5e99f
So do I have the “corrupt” version? That would explain why Kodi refuses to play it. But shouldn’t the usenet version be the “correct” version?

I was about to mention the same thing, which has bothered me for a while, Kodi has steadfastly refused to play the ISO for me, if I select to navigate into the image instead and launch the individual .m2ts files, they play (actually, trying to play the ISO wasn’t refused, it just sits there forever and generally forces me to have to kill the whole process to recover). Has anyone gotten the “correct” version of the ISO to play under Kodi?

no, Kodi just doesn’t like these disks.

Yep, the myspeen torrent probably modified your file.

Here is difference i have found so far:

a.b.starwars blocks 20004-20078:
CA 00 01 00 D2 2D 7E 00 40 00 00 00 10 1F E0 07 06 0C 0E 29 29 3C 50 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 2E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C0 51 2C 01 A0 00 00 00 00 2A 49 6D 67 42 75 72 6E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Ê…Ò-~.@…à…))<P…~…ÀQ,. …*ImgBurn…

myspleen blocks 20004-20078:
53 00 01 00 D0 B8 7E 00 40 00 00 00 10 1F E0 07 06 0D 09 32 06 07 4B 21 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 2E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C0 51 2C 01 A0 00 00 00 00 2A 49 6D 67 42 75 72 6E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04

S…и~.@…à…2…K!..~…ÀQ,. …*ImgBurn…

pittrek said:

Williarob said:

dahmage said:

So, am i crazy?

the file i downloaded from a.b.starwars hashes differently from what is on the spleen. the torrent checked to like 99% from what i had. anyone else have the same? i even re-extracted from the rar’s and got the same difference:

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from a.b.starwars
sha1sum: ccdc72ab1f67bbbdfa06e80f8bc5c14d97fbb996
sha256sum: 916de560acd1a9f40f564909aea9c37a78ef8da0fe44a0260157ae62fd243263

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from myspleen
sha1sum: 9b5df42aa7a7d346711dd969f8650f18b6d5e99f
sha256sum: 183e36fe4591e7f947b9d63d07f1bb920f1039a35e9853355d835e3a33df132f

I have:

Name: Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso
Date: 6/12/2016
Size: 37 GB (1,654,128,640 bytes)

---

SHA-1: ccdc72ab1f67bbbdfa06e80f8bc5c14d97fbb996
MD5: f9556d51e8cd6647ac076d7b8284f896
CRC32: 68e66e85

Now this is fascinating…

I downloaded the ISO from usenet and my SHA checksum is 9b5df42aa7a7d346711dd969f8650f18b6d5e99f
So do I have the “corrupt” version? That would explain why Kodi refuses to play it. But shouldn’t the usenet version be the “correct” version?

Hah. fascinating indeed. i got it from usenet as well, but mine matches what williarob has.

do you still have the RAR files? what crc value does it show for the file? when i view the rar file using 7-zip, it shows the correct crc value for what williarob posted…

they aren’t on myspleen yet, but you have a PM

I am certain the difference between the files is minor. I haven’t tried to do a binary diff since these files are huge, bit since the torrent hashes to 99 percent it is probably only one block that is different. I will check closer.

So this really is just about ensuring that the exact same file is being shared in all locations. Might seem picky, but I hate having inconsistencies like this.

Williarob said:

dahmage said:

So, am i crazy?

the file i downloaded from a.b.starwars hashes differently from what is on the spleen. the torrent checked to like 99% from what i had. anyone else have the same? i even re-extracted from the rar’s and got the same difference:

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from a.b.starwars
sha1sum: ccdc72ab1f67bbbdfa06e80f8bc5c14d97fbb996
sha256sum: 916de560acd1a9f40f564909aea9c37a78ef8da0fe44a0260157ae62fd243263

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from myspleen
sha1sum: 9b5df42aa7a7d346711dd969f8650f18b6d5e99f
sha256sum: 183e36fe4591e7f947b9d63d07f1bb920f1039a35e9853355d835e3a33df132f

I have:

Name: Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso
Date: 6/12/2016
Size: 37 GB (1,654,128,640 bytes)

---

SHA-1: ccdc72ab1f67bbbdfa06e80f8bc5c14d97fbb996
MD5: f9556d51e8cd6647ac076d7b8284f896
CRC32: 68e66e85

Yup.

Well, SnooPac do you mind if i replace your upload with the fixed file or do you want to fix it? good news is it should only require minor download to sync the changes.

njvc said:

Just a heads up, I’ve corrected those spelling errors and re-exported the ESB BD50. I won’t bother reuploading the whole thing to MEGA, but the version that I share on myspleen in the coming days will have the corrected spelling.

Sounds like a plan! i will hold off on burning that one.

i recently got this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/914202-REG/canon_6992b002aa_pixma_mx922_wireless_office.html

like it so far

SnooPac said:

Very strange dahmage.
The version that ended up on spleen was just the exact extracted ISO from Usenet. No changes were made. Not intentionally, anyway.
Maybe Williarob can confirm which hash is correct based on the original file?

(I also get 183e36fe4591e7f947b9d63d07f1bb920f1039a35e9853355d835e3a33df132f)

Thanks to you and RU.08 for confirming. The files are so close to one another that it must be a very minor change. (as i said, my file hashed to like 99% of the torrent). If i hadn’t re-extracted it from the rar files i would have just figured i had an error on my side.

Can anyone else who got this from a.b.starwars compare? thanks!

So, am i crazy?

the file i downloaded from a.b.starwars hashes differently from what is on the spleen. the torrent checked to like 99% from what i had. anyone else have the same? i even re-extracted from the rar’s and got the same difference:

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from a.b.starwars
sha1sum: ccdc72ab1f67bbbdfa06e80f8bc5c14d97fbb996
sha256sum: 916de560acd1a9f40f564909aea9c37a78ef8da0fe44a0260157ae62fd243263

Star_Wars_SSE_TN1_v1_6.iso from myspleen
sha1sum: 9b5df42aa7a7d346711dd969f8650f18b6d5e99f
sha256sum: 183e36fe4591e7f947b9d63d07f1bb920f1039a35e9853355d835e3a33df132f

njvc said:

Lol. Can’t believe I missed those. Not sure It’s worth a complete re-upload unless major issues are discovered though. They can exist as quirks on page 2…

Just make note of it, since we expect ESB 2.5 sometime in the next year, i would say just make sure these are corrected when you update the disk for that version? Or are we thinking that we can just replace the video stream directly with the new one when ESB 2.5 is out?

Oops Yeah I was confused about that as well

towne32 said:

clutchins said:

Say something like this:

ESB DE 2.0 BD25: Just the Film
ESB DE 2.0 BD25: Just the Special Features
ESB DE 2.0 BD50: Film + Special Features + Bonus Commentaries
ESB DE 2.0 BD25: Documentaries

The third one doesn’t have the Bonus Documentaries.

but it does have bonus commentaries as clutchins said. but your misreading has a point, as others may do the same. besides, the doc disc is not specific to a film, but is for the trilogy. but yeah, names similar to these should be somewhat clear?

☺

hey njvc, how is empire coming along? just curious, i wouldn’t blame you if you slowed down your pace from star wars. 😀

Williarob said:

SSE Cover, take 4 (“Special Edition” was spelled wrong):

In all seriousness, thanks for the cover(s)!

You can use free connections for recently posted items, that’s what I do.

Thanks! that was faster than i expected!

and the labels shrink over time which warps the disk. i made this mistake on a huge collection 10+ years ago and won’t touch labels anymore. i used to use lightscribe, and just recently got an inkjet printer that can print directly to disk, love it!

Harmy said:

I think anyone who openly admits to being a troll should be banned, don’t you?

yes

well usenet is good obviously, i like spleen… why not there? (sorry i must be out of loop, i guess because of 35mm stance taken?)