budwhite

 

Chewtobacca said:

Is this when you're verifying or burning?  If it's when you're verifying, try it out anyway.

I've had error messages in imgburn on many occasions during verification, and the final discs have played perfectly.  I've never downloaded the sample, though.

 well duh, It did work all the time, I never thought it would burn so fast so I figure it was the burning and not the verifying that was wrong.

I'm not used to imgburn, don¨t know if I ever burned anything before with it.

thanks anyway

crap, same error

I will

It is when burning, at the beginning

"Now i can't guarantee that this format will play on every Blu-Ray player so i have made a small sample, that you will need to burn to a DVD, that you can test to see if your player is compatible before getting the release. You will waste a DVD-5 for just a few minutes of movie but it will save you wasting a DVD-9 anyway. Instructions on how to burn are included but its just an iso but burn with Imgburn because it gives a better compatibility than Nero (Nero UDF files system 2.50, which blu-ray is, is messed up and caused the disc to be unreadable in most cases). You don't really need to download this if you have a PS3 but if you want to be on the safe side (its been tested without any problems on a UK PS3 using the latest firmware - 2.41)

BLU-RAY AOTC SMALL SAMPLE TEST AVCHD -BURN ON DVD-5 -143mb approx rapidshare
"

I get an error when I'm trying to burn this with imgburn

W 19:07:07 Failed to Read Sector 4224 - Reason: Unrecovered Read Error

 W 19:07:07 Sector 4224 maps to File: \BDMV\STREAM\00001.m2ts

And that it is a shitty movie and you don't wanna see it more than nessecary

Excellent

I think you should go with the color corrected versions DJ, if you use it with light settings.

Your first pics were too much but the last was pretty good with more neutral colors.

Go light with the corrections, or else let it be. That's my two cents

puggo, you don't happen to have any comparison pics so one can see how much was cropped?

Also, sure there are lots of dust and scratches and many other problems but this looks more film like than the gout.

For you with big screens/TVs: How does this hold up?

Reel two was the worst to work with no? It's so greyish. Other than that and that some scenes are pretty dark it is pretty nice looking.

MoveAlong said:

budwhite said:

I just watched a few minutes of it.(d/l from a.b.starwars) Very decent looking, better than I thought it would be. But is the aspect ratio correct? I had thicker black bars than usual on my 32" WS TV.

The bottom of the print Puggo telecined was severely cropped. Therefore the black bars have to be bigger to maintain proper AR.

 

aha, must have missed that info earlier.

Thanks to anyone involved. Pretty cool release.

I like some but others are way to redish.

I just watched a few minutes of it.(d/l from a.b.starwars) Very decent looking, better than I thought it would be. But is the aspect ratio correct? I had thicker black bars than usual on my 32" WS TV.

yeah I saw that now, I'm pretty new to newsgroups.

1gb?

Lets say this take a year of hard work and money for the ones involved. And than Lucas relases the Blu-ray in 2011 including the unaltered trilogy. It is possible after all, however, not likely in my opinon.

I guess my point being if this project is ever to see the light of day it should be done fast.

Also, if this, somehow, would be scanned in HD. Then it really puts Lucas in a position that he has to release the orginal on Blu-ray.  I mean what a dissaster and an ambarrassament for him, if a fan project turned up in that (presumable)great quality

Why the new versions Jedi? Is the script that much improved?

A SD scan would hardly be worth the effort, IMO. I don't think the results would be even close to the tremendous results G-force & dark_jedi are getting from the GOUT with the stabilization scripts.

 

 

 Intresting point

So how is the scanning gonna be then? Most new studio transfers are 4k and then downconverted to 1080 for blu and 480 for DVD.

It really is a pity with all the resolution of the 35mm print. No offence.

That said, I'm looking forward to this project anyway. And great works guys.

What's the use in making a dts mix and pushing the bitrate up? low bitrate in, low bitrate out?

But PLIIx codes every channel in stereo. I think it's a hugh difference compared to the old one

Thanks for your reply dude. Do I have to seperate L&R channel in some way or do I just load the pcm wav in both channels + the lfe in the sub?

Would be cool if it got a little old school touch. It looks to clean and modern. Imho

TV's Frink said:

budwhite said:

Moth3r said:

dark_jedi said:

... reversing the left and right surround is not difficult at all...

From what I remember, it's only the music in the rear channels that is reversed - the sound effects are correctly positioned. So, in order to fix the issue, you would need to isolate the music from the effects. Not easy.

Sometimes I wonder how people could notice things like this.

 

Seems like the wrong place to wonder this...

 

heh heh

Front channels is one thing but the rears, no way I would have noticed.  I do have a cheap 6.1 system though.

hairy_hen said:

I've uploaded the LFE channel as a FLAC file for anyone who wants it.  To use, simply combine with the 1993 PCM soundtrack from Belbecus.  It already has the 1.017 seconds of silence at the beginning, so make sure your PCM has this at the beginning as well.  Then simply load your wavs for each channel into the AC3 encoder of your choice.  For those without high-end software, I recommend Aften (or a gui thereof) as it's free and easy to use.  I encoded as 2/0 + LFE format at 448 kbps, to preserve the best possible quality for DVD.  If you have the ability to derive 4 or 5 channels from the stereo mix, using some kind of ProLogic/ProLogic 2 emulation software, feel free to do so.

If you are working on a GOUT-synched preservation project using HD footage and creating a custom 5.1 mix using the '93 and '97 soundtracks, please feel free to use this if it's to your liking.  (lol)

 

Here's the link: http://www.sendspace.com/file/zchhv8

How the hell do I get aften to work? There aint no program files in that map?