logo Sign In

brash_stryker

User Group
Members
Join date
19-May-2009
Last activity
24-Sep-2018
Posts
1,587

Post History

Post
#765591
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

Having the same ship just HAPPEN to fall into the hands of another principal character we meet 30 years later is a lot for a viewer to accept. Especially when they're already stretching their suspension of disbelief enough just from R2 & Threepio being linked to both Anakin and Luke through (mostly) chance.

R2 & C3P0 are a given though. Lucas took inspiration from the 2 peasant characters in The Hidden Fortress. They're the lowliest of the low witnessing epic events unfold. It's nice that the audience has these 2 relatable characters to unify the series even if it's far fetched. Their interactions tell us a lot about the universe for starters, and as the most insignificant beings in the universe - just humble servants doing their jobs, it helps to introduce a viewer to this big scary galaxy and its conflict. We relate to them because as spectators, we are 'fish out of water' in this fantastic and unfamiliar setting and in a way so are they (or at least 3P0 is). Adventure is alien to 3P0 and he's being dragged kicking and screaming into one and we're joining him for the ride. The droids' inclusion is forgivable because of what it achieves.

A ship on the other hand just seems superficial.

The fan service in the PT need to be cut down, not added to. Fan service "of a higher caliber" as you say, is still fan service, and all I can see it accomplishing is challenging the viewer's suspension of disbelief. Just my opinion.

Post
#765581
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Ronster said:

I have spotted something about a month a go and I have held off bringing it up because iI would be shocked if it is something you had not already addressed and probably already fixed. But it is not on the list....

Is it a reflection of a boom mic operator or a camera man on that dark helmet?



I don't see it.

Post
#765523
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

Darth Lucas said:

brash_stryker said:

I think seeing the same specific ship in the Prequels would be almost as ridiculous as seeing a child Han, or the existing scene of Chewbacca. Just pure fan service that shrinks the universe.

I'm all for a consistent "hero ship" throughout the PT, just not the falcon. 

 Why not then take the original design for the falcon (altered slightly and later used as the Tantive IV) and use that as the hero ship, calling it simply, "The Tantive"

The original design of the Falcon was the Tantive only with the Falcon style cockpit instead of the "Hammerhead" design.

Something more along those lines (and in keeping with original McQuarrie concepts) would be welcome in my book.

Post
#765097
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

darklordoftech said:

brash_stryker said:

luckydube56 said:

 

 Nice work.

I actually like the concept of the new enemy built off the old.  Kind of like the Romans building their civilization off the Greeks.

I know nothing so take it for what its worth.   But there does seem to be a lot of respect being paid to Darth Vader by this new villain.  This new empire seems a bit more of a religious bureaucracy.  Or maybe just more zealous to the last man.

The old empire was Hitler + Wehrmacht.

The new empire seems Hitler + SS.

If that makes any sense.

The only problem with that ancient symbol being a precursor to the Empire symbol is the Prequels. As darklordoftech rightly pointed out, the Empire symbol is previously the Republic symbol in the Prequels, so it's a symbol of good subverted to be a symbol of evil. I personally don't think Palps would keep a symbol of the old Republic as his new Empire's sigil though, and yet that's what we got in the Prequels. Goody.

Isn't this the opposite of what we said in our discussion?  Neither of us said anything about the prequels and you said, "I'm not suggesting it's a good idea."

Discussion? I indeed said I wasn't suggesting it was a good idea. That's not to say that it isn't one. It's just not the point I was making. I was just pointing out the superficial link between the designs and speculating about the design team's mindset.

You said in your other post that you liked the fact the symbol of the Empire was the symbol of the Republic Ben remembered. It's the Prequels that introduced that, which is what I was referencing above.....

Post
#765027
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

luckydube56 said:

 

 Nice work.

I actually like the concept of the new enemy built off the old.  Kind of like the Romans building their civilization off the Greeks.

I know nothing so take it for what its worth.   But there does seem to be a lot of respect being paid to Darth Vader by this new villain.  This new empire seems a bit more of a religious bureaucracy.  Or maybe just more zealous to the last man.

The old empire was Hitler + Wehrmacht.

The new empire seems Hitler + SS.

If that makes any sense.

The only problem with that ancient symbol being a precursor to the Empire symbol is the Prequels. As darklordoftech rightly pointed out, the Empire symbol is previously the Republic symbol in the Prequels, so it's a symbol of good subverted to be a symbol of evil. I personally don't think Palps would keep a symbol of the old Republic as his new Empire's sigil though, and yet that's what we got in the Prequels. Goody.

I guess it's possible though that Disney/JJ are ignoring the Prequels. JJ certainly did when asked questions at the opening panel of Celebration! :p

The similarities between the designs are difficult to ignore though. Even if they've intended no inferred links between them, at the very least Lucasfilm appear to have seen that symbol and gone "this is cool, rejig it".

Post
#764888
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

darklordoftech said:

brash_stryker said:

Expanding further on the hexagonal symbol. It's not outside the realms of possibility that Lucasfilm have taken a shine to this symbol and imagery and want to use it. Afterall, the EU isn't off limits if they see something they like. 

The game is set 4,000 years before the movies, and this is the symbol for the ancient Sith Empire of that time. 




It's sort of a precursor to the Galactic Empire symbol. They have similar designs except the obvious different basic shapes.

I don't know about you guys, but the symbol on the flag in the trailer seems to be a hybrid of the two designs to me. It utilises a circle within a hexagon, with a 'spoked' design just like the others.
Could this be symbolic of the Imperials/Sith returning to their roots?

I know this idea relies on Lucasfilm referencing the symbol from SWTOR (those who know the game will get it, those that don't won't care), but it just seems too perfect to me to be coincidence. 

I've always hated the resemblence of the Sith Empire's symbol to the Galactic Empire's symbol because:

1. Why would Palpatine use ancient Sith symbols rather than do his own thing? Palpatine has no respect for anyone besides himself.

2. Wasn't Palpatine hiding that he was a Sith? If you're hiding the fact that you're a Nazi, you wouldn't publicly use a swastika.

3. It undermines an irony that I love: that the Galactic Empire is the very Republic that Obi-Wan remembers so fondly.

I'm not suggesting it's a good idea. I'm just putting my cynical 'Disney Executive' hat on and trying to discern the possible reason for the similarity. It may be they've taken a shine to it and want to give a nod to it with this similar one, signifying rebirth. It could be that Disney loves money and sometime soon there'll be a 'Visual guide' book accompanying TFA that explains the provenance of the symbol and that it can be traced back to the Ancient Sith Empire. *hint hint* Buy our game, kids!

Post
#764879
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Expanding further on the hexagonal symbol. It's not outside the realms of possibility that Lucasfilm have taken a shine to this symbol and imagery and want to use it. Afterall, the EU isn't off limits if they see something they like. 

The game is set 4,000 years before the movies, and this is the symbol for the ancient Sith Empire of that time. 




It's sort of a precursor to the Galactic Empire symbol. They have similar designs except the obvious different basic shapes.

I don't know about you guys, but the symbol on the flag in the trailer seems to be a hybrid of the two designs to me. It utilises a circle within a hexagon, with a 'spoked' design just like the others.
Could this be symbolic of the Imperials/Sith returning to their roots?

I know this idea relies on Lucasfilm referencing the symbol from SWTOR (those who know the game will get it, those that don't won't care), but it just seems too perfect to me to be coincidence. 

EDIT: Also, it's worth noting that despite being technically non-canon now (being EU) it's still a thriving MMORPG that's making them money. Tying elements of a game in with their new movies for the purpose of cross-promotion (even if its something as insignificant as the origins of a symbol) is exactly the kind of thing Disney/Lucasfilm would do. In fact they're doing just that already with the upcoming DLC for Battlefront that shows the player the battle that left all those derelicts on Jakku.

Post
#764870
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

I've often wished that the new movies would mine the best parts of the EU for inspiration, and it seems that whether inspired or not, certain things have aligned fairly closely (ish) with the game The Old Republic, in particular with regard to the ancient Sith Empire in the game.

Of course, a flag hanging isn't unique to that game. It's very naziesque as well...but still it's strikingly similar. Also, both symbols are hexagonal!. The use of red, with that symbol, as well as the ominous name "The First Order" to me, makes it seem more like a Sith cult than a straight dictatorship.

Likewise the use of red lighting in high tech interiors seems quite satanic, and again aligns with the moody interiors in the Sith Capital in The Old Republic.

My bet would be that they're settling here because it's some sort of ancient Sith world. The base seems to be built into the rock (as you can see the red light is casting on stone). Perhaps they're excavating whatever was there before, long buried beneath the snow.

Speaking of buried beneath the snow, here's Hoth in the same game. A similar ship graveyard concept to what we see with Jakku in the trailer.

Finally, I've always thought that Kylo Ren's mask drew inspiration from Darth Revan from the preceding Knights of the Old Republic games. I'm not complaining. It's a great design.

Post
#764844
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the PT era star destroyer so far (the one the Falcon flies into).

It looks to me more like a Super Star Destroyer (like the Executor) on its back.
Note the 3 engines and further hull extending towards the bottom of the frame in the trailer.

Post
#764796
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Agreed, they seem to have gone fairly easy on the shaky cam, but these snap-zooms are obnoxious. Takes you right out of the movie. I hate that sort of self-reflexive film making. This is meant to be fantasy and escapism and we are meant to be disembodied spectators. Why would any filmmaker go out of their way to make it seem as if there's a cameraman filming it? In shots that never even involved a camera no less. Boggles the mind.

Having said that, the trailer in general was very pleasing to me. You get the sense that our heroes are thrust into the adventure organically just as Luke was, and everything we see meshes aesthetically with the OT. The super clean troopers on that ice world was jarring initially, but I'm getting the sense that this new incarnation of the Empire is totalitarian, and cult-like rather than being the straightforward dictatorship it used to be. It fits for me.

The crispness of the image is always going to take some getting used to. As others have said though, it's 2015 and to be expected. Those 4K/imax shots do show some really nice grain though, which is an enormous upgrade from the overly scrubbed cartoon look of the Prequels.

Post
#763739
Topic
The Hobbit: Condensed Edition - A 3 into 1 Fan Edit by brash_stryker
Time

Some of you may know that I had an Attack of the Clones edit in the works for quite a few years. Unfortunately, because that film proved to be ultimately unfixable, I decided to abandon the project. It was in as complete a state as any edit out there, but I just didn’t consider it good enough to release. The Hobbit movies on the other hand, show a lot more potential for improvements. With the release of the Blu-Ray of The Battle of the Five Armies, several complete edits have emerged, one or two of them quite ambitious. I still have a lot of work left to do on mine, but I figured it was time for this thread to be born.

From the outset, I’ve got to say that I have the greatest respect for Peter Jackson. He’s a competent filmmaker who tells compelling stories, however I do feel that he’s become a victim of ‘George Lucas syndrome’; a lack of restraint when making his films which I can only attribute to all the praise lavished upon him since LOTR, along with the studio no longer curtailing him. You can see this happening to a degree during the course of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. More gags were introduced and the action set pieces got a bit sillier and over the top as they went along. I firmly believe that Fellowship of the Ring is the strongest of the three, but don’t get me wrong, I still love those movies and they are among my all time favourites.

And then we get to The Hobbit, and the gratuitous excess has had the volume turned up to 11, despite originally being a smaller story with less at stake. Some scenes from the book have been altered to accommodate more action (which is fine in certain instances - this is an adaptation not a straight up faithful translation after all) however sometimes it impacts on continuity with Lord of the Rings; maintaining which ought to have been the main goal here from the outset.

Other times, sections of the book I felt ought to have been omitted, were left in and expanded despite being throwaway mentions e.g. the stone giants scene. Many things in Lord of the Rings were left out of the movies, necessitated by the limitations of the medium and its runtime. This ought to have been the case here rather than cramming in absolutely everything they could.

And then we have the length. As Bilbo told Gandalf in Fellowship of the Ring, he felt “thin… stretched. Like butter scraped over too much bread”. In the same way, these films feel as though they’ve been stretched out far beyond what the source material should have allowed. They’ve expanded the story to incorporate a Dwarf/Orc grudge with several resulting battles and chases, Gandalf investigating Dol Guldur along with his sidekick, Birdshit-Head, premature introductions of Sauron, Saruman & Galadriel, conspiratorial arrests in Laketown, Orc hunting/investigation with Legolas and Tauriel and that damn love triangle! All of these additions steal focus away from our titular Hobbit. It’s the title of the film, so that’s who it should have been about. Jackson can’t seem to resist inserting fan service and Lord of the Rings references everywhere along with contrived and forced foreshadowing. It comes across as a self-aware prequel that relies too much on prior knowledge of the subsequent instalments. This is very much the same problem we had with the Star Wars Prequels, however unlike the Star Wars Prequels, I believe these movies can be fixed.

My Goals:

  • Correct tonal inconsistencies as well as issues of continuity with LOTR.
  • Address issues with pacing and remove the superfluous, gratuitous, cartoony or unrealistic.
  • Make Bilbo more consistent within the film (he no longer goes from cowering wuss to John McClane with a sword, and then back to cowering wuss again) and also shift the focus to him to make him a true protagonist.

I’m working with a very talented VFX artist, and hope to show off some really great new/altered shots soon.
First of all, while waiting for the 3rd movie to release, I had a play around with a fanedit.org banner. No idea if this aligns with any guidelines that exist. If not, I’ll have to change it.

I’ve also been working on a cover/case for it. Here’s what I have so far. The idea was to make it a foldable digipak template. Still some faces to add to it, but I’d of course be creating a cover with the correct dimensions for a standard case as well.

As far as the VFX goes, there’s only really one shot where I can showcase the change with a still, and that’s the following shot. With the help of someone extremely talented, I’ve restored the scene to its original intent in the book (along with matching what Bilbo tells the Hobbiton children in FOTR). No more Gandalf splitting the rock to let the sunshine through. It’s now a straightforward sunrise.

I’m aiming to cut them all down to between 3 & 3.5 hours in length. One release will be a 1080p mkv, another of 2 separate Blu Ray disc images. The split will exist to keep the bitrate high, as well as serving as a sort of homage to the LOTR releases where a title appeared saying 'The Story Continues on Disk Two…

Good audio is of utmost importance to me, and is frequently neglected in most other edits. I’ll be doing my best to ensure that all audio transitions are smooth and occur at the most suitable points possible. I’m working with 6 channel 5.1 surround.

Cutlist:

  • The first words uttered are “In a hole in the ground, there lived a Hobbit”, I’ve completely reworked the voiceover that follows the title.

  • Ian Holm is kept, but he is a faceless narrator/storyteller which I think fits with it being a children’s book. Also, this works for me from a continuity perspective. Ian Holm has aged since FOTR, and this is meant to be him on the same day. Sad but true.

  • Unlike some edits, I keep the prologue about the fall of Erebor. I think it’s needed and helps get the Dwarf history out of the way so the remainder of the story can be devoted to Bilbo. The prologue is drastically shortened to remove some of the more silly bits about the Dwarves’ skills. It also contains nothing about Thror losing his mind, or the elves. I may even cut more than that. I have a few test versions I’m working on.

  • Frodo is gone, as is the entire post-prologue scene of old Bilbo. After the prologue we carry on with the voiceover and go straight to Martin Freeman’s Bilbo and skip over Old Bilbo smoking outside entirely. VFX was needed to excise the smoke butterfly. As of right now, it takes around 6:20 to get to Bilbo saying “Good Morning” to Gandalf.

  • Minor tweaks to good morning scene dialogue.

  • The Dwarves invading Bagend has been trimmed to remove a lot of silliness, notably the plate throwing singsong. Here’s one part that was way too faithful to the book for me.

  • The conversation about the quest has been reordered. Still working on perfecting that.

  • We transition straight to the old farmhouse near where the trolls are. Gandalf leaves without explanation. No argument about elves.

  • The battle with the Trolls is cut, as is them throwing down their weapons. I’ve got 2 possible options of transitioning to the Dwarves already captured.

  • The troll sequence is trimmed to excise some silliness.

  • The trolls are turned to stone by a normal sunrise. Gandalf isn’t involved, the rock stays intact, and the sun creeps up behind the rock as it should have all along.

  • Thorin isn’t damning of Bilbo after he just saved their asses.

  • Troll cave trimmed.

  • Bilbo being given Sting trimmed.

  • No Radagast. At all. EVER.

  • No orcs either. We don’t see orcs until the battle of the five armies. Though i guess it should be noted that Tolkien himself never drew a distinction between Orcs and Goblins. They were interchangeable.

  • Rivendell is trimmed for Dwarf silliness and superfluous scenes.

  • No Galadriel, No Saruman, no white council. In fact, there is no Dol Guldur subplot at all and there never will be.

  • Stone giants removed.

  • Fall into the goblin tunnels trimmed.

  • Toying with a VFX-heavy solution to getting rid of Bilbo’s ridiculous fall to Gollum’s cave. Not sure yet if it can be accomplished

  • Goblin King scene heavily trimmed and reordered.

  • Fight with the goblins is cut down significantly. I think most editors really overthink this scene when they chop it up. The fix to cut it down is very simple.

  • Riddles in the dark is unchanged, though all the intercutting back to the Goblin battle is removed as most of the battle is gone now.

  • I’m attempting to preserve the scene with them hiding in the trees from the Wargs and being rescued by Eagles.

  • I’m attempting to reinstate Beorn, whilst removing any mention of Orcs or the now excised Dol Guldur subplot.

  • I liked the Mirkwood scenes as they are presented in the extended edition. I may utilise some or all of it as it sells the illusionary and disorientating forest really well.

  • VFX tweaks to the Spider scene in the works

  • Bilbo never loses his ring or murders a baby insect. In fact, the corrupting influence of the ring is non-existent in this edit. Too soon, PJ.

  • Legolas is reduced to glimpses. He’s a cameo now. No spider-riding nonsense.

  • Tauriel is no longer a character. She’s a nameless elf with no dialogue.

  • Scenes inside the woodland realm are heavily trimmed.

  • The barrel scene is edited down to within an inch of its life. No Orcs, No Elves thwarting their escape. The barrels just drift down the river as in the book.

  • The Dwarves come ashore and Kili is no longer injured.

  • Trims to Bard’s introduction and them being smuggled into Laketown. Those two Pugs are staying though as I have two just like them.

  • Alfrid is no longer an annoyance. He’s there, but he’s just the Master’s (silent) assistant.

  • All the conspiratorial bullshit with the Master of Laketown having a grudge against Bard is gone.

  • None of the Dwarves stay behind in Laketown. Will utilise some minor VFX to sell that fact. There is no celebration of them leaving.

  • The Dwarves getting through the hidden door is trimmed. They no longer give up or try to break through

  • Smaug’s conversation with Bilbo is trimmed, but it’s mostly awesome.

  • There is no Smaug fight in the mountain at all. This is another scene that most editors overthink. Getting around the silliness is actually very simple.

  • Bard’s family, Dwarves and Tauriel cut from Laketown when Smaug attacks.

  • Bard shoots Smaug with a normal arrow. His son is not involved.

The majority of my cuts to The Battle of the Five Armies are all over the place. Once it’s less chaotic and my choices are set in stone, I’ll update this cutlist.

Post
#763147
Topic
Star Wars Digital HD Release .... April 10th
Time

Akton said:

Han Solo IRL said:

I don't think fan reverence for Darth Vader should be projected on to characters in a film who don't even know of Anakin's future.

 Well, George Lucas seemed to think that pretty much every other kind of wanky fanservice  nod to Vader's popularity needed to be artificially projected backward onto the character of Anakin. He never seemed to miss an opportunity to ham-fistedly browbeat the audience with jarring, gratuitous, wink-wink-nudge-nudge reminders that Anakin's future as Vader was on the horizon:

- "We're going to be watching your career with great interest!"

- "Why do I get the feeling that you're going to be the death of me?"

- Vader breathing at the end of TPM.

- Anakin casting a Vader shadow in the TPM poster.

- Vader's face in Anakin's cloak in that wretched ROTS poster.

Hell, the whole Anakin-as-Chosen-One theme so central to the entire prequel trilogy is just such an artificial projection. It makes absolutely no sense in the greater scheme of the saga; it's simply a lazy, contrived imposition of gravitas and importance onto a character for no other reason than that he's a pop culture icon in the real world, utterly apart from the universe he inhabits.

What I mean about preserving the character's mystique is this: Leave some mystery to his origins. There's no reason to introduce him to us as a child. Han Solo retains so much of his mystique because we are introduced to him fully formed, yet still prime for a transformative character arc. That would be greatly compromised if we were subjected to a ten-year-old Han prancing and gamboling about the forests of Kashyyk or wherever (which very nearly happened, by the way). Did Han's grandmother call him "Hanny-poo?" I don't know and I don't want to. We don't need to. It would add nothing of value to the character and, in fact, would detract much.

And what I mean about preserving Vader's dignity is this: Give his younger self character traits consistent with his future self. An abiding intellectual interest in fascism (as opposed to ignorant indifference); a deep-seated hatred for the galactic republic in its current condition (apart from a single throwaway line); an innate tendency to violence and even cruelty (as opposed to an isolated indulgence in revenge) - all of these can conceivably lead to a character like Darth Vader whilst preserving the character's dignity. Presenting him as a churlish, whiny, lovesick and, frankly, not very intelligent man-child? Not so much (on either score). Respecting his dignity means showing him actually converting to the Dark Side, not being tricked into it. Respecting his dignity means not saddling him with a childish, effeminate nickname. Respecting his dignity means not going out of your way to craft an entire film introducing the character in his childhood (with all the various indignities concomitant with that) in which nothing at all of consequence to the saga happens that could not have occurred later anyway.

What I'm asking for is that the character be treated with the respect and consistency due to him in his own story, not the projection of an extraneous "fan reverence," which, with all his ham-fisted winks to the audience and his utterly false, tacked-on "chosen one" plot contrivance is precisely what Lucas actually did.

All this. Totally agree.

Fans aren't reacting to the name Ani/Annie just because they feel Darth Vader is due retrospective reverence in his backstory. As Akton just pointed out, that's exactly what Lucas did repeatedly in the form of horrible forced foreshadowing. That nickname would be cringey for ANY Star Wars character. For the sake of argument, let's say we had a character called 'Anableps Calrissian', and he kept being addressed as "Annie". It would still be horrible. Him having future significance doesn't come into it.

Explaining it away in-universe by saying "but it's a shortening of Anakin" doesn't change the fact it could (and should) have been written differently.

This isn't really the thread for this discussion though, I know.

Post
#762943
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Masirimso3 said:

So I was wondering... Are you going to add a cool lightsaber music to the Bespin duel like you added Battle of the Heroes to the Death Star duel? I thought that was very well done and I would like to see something similar to that.

I made a quick idea video on how it would be like (and please read the description) if you put Duel of the Fates from the Phantom Menace to that duel:

youtube.com/watch?v=gE_4DvHAGsQ

P.S. If I'm doing something wrong by posting the YouTube link the I sincerely apologize. It's just that I couldn't find a video adding button to the post like in Fanedit.org.

Ady has no intention of adding music to the Cloud City duel. In fact, I think he intends to dial back his changes when he redoes ANH in HD, and that won't include Battle of the Heroes anymore either.

The original intent adding that music was that it was symbolic of Vader and Obi's last battle. Duel of the Fates on the other hand has no significance to either Vader or Luke, so I don't think there's any payoff with it. Maybe in another edit :)

Post
#762843
Topic
Star Wars Digital HD Release .... April 10th
Time

generalfrevious said:

brash_stryker said:

Fang Zei said:

I was naively hoping that Fox's ownership of distribution rights on the existing films (and Disney's desire for them) could lead to a deal where that might actually happen. 

Same here, even though I knew deep down that would never happen. It's like with the Hobbit movies. I'd hoped that the licensing issue with MGM wouldn't impact on the opening New Line Cinema intro, so we could still have continuity with Lord of the Rings. Instead we get 35 seconds of 3 different logos - Warner Bros, New Line, and finally the MGM lion. Ridiculous.

The best we can hope for is that this was a rushed placeholder to prime us for not seeing the Fox intro anymore, meanwhile Williams is composing the actual new fanfare ready for TFA. My concern is that even as a rushed placeholder, the transition is so horrendous that I'm having serious doubts about their quality control process. If they can fuck up an intro, what are they doing with the movie?

 Star Wars and quality control have been mutually exclusive since 1983. Disney is just carrying on the tradition of impossible to fathom incompetence.

The amount of issues such as transparency that slipped through in the SE shows that there was always a degree of incompetence when it came to post-ROTJ Star Wars. Lucas's decisions, as well as quality control over the years have been beyond baffling, and he's done nothing but try to sink his own ship before jumping from it, it seems. Disney is a huge upgrade from Lucas, even if the problems are still there.

Why do people act like Disney is the harbinger of (continuing) doom or something?

Post
#762832
Topic
Star Wars Digital HD Release .... April 10th
Time

Fang Zei said:

I was naively hoping that Fox's ownership of distribution rights on the existing films (and Disney's desire for them) could lead to a deal where that might actually happen. 

Same here, even though I knew deep down that would never happen. It's like with the Hobbit movies. I'd hoped that the licensing issue with MGM wouldn't impact on the opening New Line Cinema intro, so we could still have continuity with Lord of the Rings. Instead we get 35 seconds of 3 different logos - Warner Bros, New Line, and finally the MGM lion. Ridiculous.

The best we can hope for is that this was a rushed placeholder to prime us for not seeing the Fox intro anymore, meanwhile Williams is composing the actual new fanfare ready for TFA. My concern is that even as a rushed placeholder, the transition is so horrendous that I'm having serious doubts about their quality control process. If they can fuck up an intro, what are they doing with the movie?

Post
#762817
Topic
Star Wars Digital HD Release .... April 10th
Time

Bingowings said:

brash_stryker said:

SilverWook said:

Even a neophyte fan editor could do a better job editing Williams' score than was done here.

 You rang? 

https://youtu.be/qBI2F2mc1pg

Took me literally 5 minutes, and I consider it sloppy and rushed. How the hell the official version got okayed though is utterly beyond me.

That is better but it's still an ending rather than an opening.

I'd imagine if someone took the open blasts of "The Throne Room" (designed to match the beginning of a triumphant scene) and truncated them you'd get something closer to the effect of the Fox fanfare.

Couldn't agree more. I think it's a completely unsuitable piece of music as a fanfare. This was just an exercise to prove that whoever knocked that together at Lucasfilm is incompetent and so are the people who approved it.

Personally, the fox intro IS Star Wars for me. I won't be watching any version with this new intro beyond episode 7. And I hope to God they realise how bad this version is before then, otherwise that's a really bad sign regarding their judgement.

Post
#762737
Topic
Star Wars Digital HD Release .... April 10th
Time

SilverWook said:

brash_stryker said:

SilverWook said:

Even a neophyte fan editor could do a better job editing Williams' score than was done here.

 You rang? 

https://youtu.be/qBI2F2mc1pg

Took me literally 5 minutes, and I consider it sloppy and rushed. How the hell the official version got okayed though is utterly beyond me.

 Post of the day! :)

Mind if I post that to the Twitter?

 No problem, I'd be honoured :)

Edit: Just followed you too, though I don't really use twitter.