logo Sign In

bkev

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Mar-2007
Last activity
21-Sep-2024
Posts
5,293

Post History

Post
#691425
Topic
DuracellEnergizer's Guide to the Multiverse (Was "DuracellEnergizer's Guide to the Infinite Timelines Beyond")
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

DuracellEnergizer said:But in one timeline Doc gets shot and dies while in another he wears a bulletproof vest and survives ...

 We don't see him die at the start of BTTF, we only see him shot. The vest reveal takes place after Marty has gone back to 1955 and after he's returned from 1955 LOL. It's possible that the Doc had the vest all along and the whole thing is just a closed time loop.

http://i1.squidoocdn.com/resize/squidoo_images/800/draft_lens14244601module125740431photo_1286997478backfuture_Lone_Pine_mall

 The Lone Pine Mall wants a word with you.

I love knowing exactly where this mall is.  For some reason I still get really excited about things like this even though I've grown up in LA.

Post
#691415
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

Not necessarily.  Dragonball Z is mistakenly cropped here in the US, and the in-house remaster by FUNimation reveals a little extra information on the side.  It's nowhere near enough to warrant the decision, but it's there.  Looks like open-matte framing often is the same.

For a more relevant version, see Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.  Regardless of what version you choose, something's always cropped.

Post
#691300
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

msycamore said:

Just remember, bkev, if all else fails use fire.

 ^Well played.

On the point of "participation": I was a member of the blog and I recall posting on many of the pieces.  However, given my lack of expertise, there's not really much I could offer other than a "looks good" or "WHOA HOW'D YOU DO THAT?" comment here and there.  Perhaps I'm only speaking for myself, but there are times when I avoid commenting with the reasoning that I don't really know what I have to offer you guys that you don't already know yourselves.  

Much love to you all for the work you're doing, of course.

Post
#691071
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

Well, can't say she doesn't fit DisneyXD's target audience -- that dumb name has always implied silly shenanigans and hardcore-ness.

 I must admit, I do have reservations but as of now I'm still of the wait-and-see mentality; however, that's mostly because Weisman is involved.  Ignoring his poor luck in keeping a show on the air, he's proven he can do great cartoons that appeal to everyone.

Post
#690901
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

skyjedi2005 said:

So the home video was intended to be 4:3 and the cinema matted for 16:9?

Way too confusing and way way over my head,lol.

 Well considering the movie was released in 1967 I doubt they had home video in market and probably did this so it'd work well on TV airings.  Just think of it as a movie that accounts for any and all overscan possibilities, lol

Post
#690856
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

msycamore said:

TServo2049 said:

Sorry for starting this by addressing -1. I was addressing the Team as a whole too. I guess I'll ask none if he has any leader info or anything.

Wasn't none announced being part of the team a few months ago?

TServo2049 said:

The paper rings around the reels are something different, they will identify the studio, sometimes the lab, sometimes other info. If the prints had them intact, and the team has any pictures of them, they might hold a clue as to the origin and purpose of the print. I've already said why I don't think it was for TV broadcast.

While I'm intrigued, has it been confirmed that this blue cast is actually a print anomaly and not just a result of their scanning approach?

-1, have you released any of your workprints other than the small chunks on vimeo?

Keep up the good work guys!

 I remember awhile ago they said they were rescanning the print and it wasn't quite as cool the second time around.  I think it's a little of a, little of b.

Post
#690843
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

I disagree; I find those pretty oversaturated for my tastes.  That isn't to say that the Diamond Edition is correct, in many places it seems a little washed out, but I think there's a proper balance inbetween the two that has yet to be found.

edit: and, in fact, the subtle color pallet of the Diamond Edition is something I like correct or no.  It could do to be a bit warmer, but something tells me it's not as far off as people think.

Post
#690590
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

At this point I'm done caring, let -1 be mysterious if he wants / is in fact still involved.  No business of mine whether he chooses to keep a low profile or not, however strange it may seem.  We're being given proof that we're not just getting taken for a ride here, and that's good enough

later

-bkev

Post
#690460
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

As much as I share the sentiments about wanting to see something a little less Jedi-centric, perhaps this could bring a chance to explore the parts of Jedi training we never saw.  One of my favorite scenes in Star Wars is the one onboard the Falcon when Obi-Wan tries to teach Luke to act on instinct with the aid of the Force.  

Then again, I never did catch Clone Wars -- so maybe it's been done already.  So long as it's not the driving force behind the plot, it could be okay.  Just a piece of the puzzle.  One can hope.