logo Sign In

bad_karma24

User Group
Members
Join date
28-Mar-2004
Last activity
13-Jun-2025
Posts
687

Post History

Post
#59489
Topic
HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: jimbo
Quote

Originally posted by: bad_karma24
Doubtful. Blu-Ray uses blue lasers... HD-DVD uses red. Though with the way technology is I wouldn't be surprised.


HD-DVD uses blue lasers too.


Where does it say this? Everything I've heard says it uses red lasers.
Quote

However I do agree with the opening of the mattes on Super 35 movies.


Why do you agree with that? You still get stuff cropped off the sides, and whenever a special effect comes in, it is often matted in 2.35:1 so you're losing information.

In any case, I still like seeing Super 35 movies in 2.35:1, because that's how the director wanted them to be viewed, and it feels less like I'm watching TV.
Post
#59437
Topic
Stop the PG-13 madness
Time
Oh, please. Violence can often times be more nasty when it's off-screen. It's called letting the audience think for themselves. I don't care what franchise it is, if you're going to see it based on the gore, then it's not worth seeing. Whatever happened to having a good story and god acting?

And AFAIK the f-word in PG-13 is limited to one, non-sexual use (IE Catch Me If You Can).

Who cares what the rating is? Just see the movie. If it's bad, it will be bad on its own account, not by how much gore is in it.
Post
#59426
Topic
HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray
Time
Sounds like a nice set-up. I assume you've gone and calibrated the gray-scale, tightened the guns, etc. It reminds me of Bjoern's.

The one thing I don't like about HD on HBO and Showtime is that more often or not they're broadcast in 1.85:1 regardless of their OAR. Very annoying.

Depending on how the new formats due, I'll probably just double-dip on the essentials.

Jimbo, what set-up are you using?
Post
#59388
Topic
HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray
Time
Mmm... 92". I can see what you mean by your priorities are different.

I have a 54" screen (16:9) yet I still don't see much of a reason to upgrade. HD is nice and all, but I'd like to wait a few years before dumping everything for a format that could be obsolete in a few years.

Just curious, how far do you sit from your screen, Jay?
Post
#59344
Topic
HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray
Time
Who cares about the age of the article? The fact is that Blu-Ray has a lot more big company support than HD-DVD.

And the codecs don't matter so much because:
A) Codecs can be quite easily changed
B) Testers have found Blu-Ray has better PQ than HD-DVD

And even though MPEG-4 is fine, VC-9 has a lot of problems with its algorithms, downconversion, etc, that needs to be fixed before it's released.

And as for recent articles, here you go. Oh, and apparantly there are 13 big companies behind Blu-Ray. "No U.S. studio has committed to the HD DVD format yet" (From your article)

If HD-DVD they don't even have a player out at all I don't see how they can expect to serve both Japan and America by 2005. Maybe Japan, but America is stretching it. Blu-Ray already has players released in Japan.

Personally I'll have to sit out the buying of either system before one takes hold. And even then, as I've said, I doubt I'll purchase more than a dozen or so title. Really no use in it.