logo Sign In

asterisk8

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Oct-2007
Last activity
29-Jun-2025
Posts
856

Post History

Post
#527227
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

darth_ender said:

Well, I am currently reading the sci-fi LOTR equivelent known as Dune.  It will take me ages to get through this considering how busy I am lately, but so far it is quite fascinating.  Definitely a different type of science fiction, but I really enjoy it.  It took me a long time to get around to picking this up because I once saw the 1984 film (I was quite young at the time, making me appreciate it even less I'm sure) and realized how awful it was.  I couldn't imagine any story that film was based on being so amazing.  Now I am happy to prove myself wrong.

Dune is one of my favorite novels of all time. It's apparently cool to hate Dune in some elite sci-fi circles, but I loved it to an almost orgasmic level.

Post
#527043
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Cave of Forgotten Dreams

9/10

An astounding tour, directed by the esteemed Werner Herzog, of the 30,000-year-old paintings in Chauvet-Pont-d'Arc Cave in Southern France. Absolutely breath-taking, in the true sense of that word. The entire audience sat enraptured by Herzog's long takes of the paintings, the way he brought us into the cave with him and gave us every opportunity to explore and examine without needing to continually cut to talking heads to comment and contextualize like most documentaries do. 

A once-in-a-lifetime experience.

Post
#524190
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Saw The Tree of Life again. I may have to move it to my top 5 films of all time. Every second of that film is perfect to me. But I don't rearrange the top 5 lightly, so we'll have to see how I feel about it after I watch it at home.

In anticipation of this second viewing, I watched Badlands, Days of Heaven, and The Thin Red Line (I saw The New World when it came out). I think Days of Heaven was my favorite of the three, and The Thin Red Line my least. TTRL failed to really connect with me like Malick's other films. I'd rank them like this:

The Tree of Life - 10/10
Days of Heaven - 10/10
Badlands - 9/10
The New World - 8/10
The Thin Red Line - 7/10

This puts Terrence Malick easily in my top 5 favorite directors after Kurosawa, Kubrick, and Coen, and before Wilder.

Post
#521300
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Badlands

Oh, Malick, you were light years beyond everyone else from the very beginning, weren't you? What a strangely beautiful and disturbingly dispassionate tale of an aimless quest for freedom in the face of death. I loved that Malick never condones or condemns his characters' actions in the film. Much in keeping with his Heideggerian background, things are what they are, people do what they do, and the mere fact of their existence is enough,  without theorizing a psychological "why".

9/10 roundy things

Post
#520905
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

My dad was kind of like that too. Not rough and cold to such a degree, but quick to anger and he believed in corporal punishment and would get angry just for strange things like making my sister laugh in the backseat when he was driving. Like you, I came to terms with it and I loved my father very much despite his unpredictable temper.

I've found that The Tree of Life dredges up memories in its audience in a way few films do. I think it has to do with Malick's style, his talent for bypassing the intellect and hitting you straight in the gut with some abstract emotion you weren't prepared for. It took me years to appreciate abstract expressionism as not an intellectual style but a viscerally emotional one, and I think Malick is perhaps the best of the best expressionistic filmmakers alive.

Post
#520901
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

RedFive said:

asterisk8 said:

The Tree of Life.

Are we still using balls? I'd need a pool full of them to properly rate this expressionist masterpiece.

Hell yes, that movie was amazing. 

Going to see it again with a different group this weekend.

Just like practically every showing I've read about, probably 10 out of 50 people walked out at some point in the first hour. A middle-aged guy behind me kept mumbling complaints to his wife every 10 seconds. I shushed him twice to no effect. Finally after a half hour of listening to him I turned around and said, "I can't listen to you talk the entire movie. Please be quiet or leave." They left.

After that, the remaining 40-some people sat in perfect silence. I feel like there should be a sign at the box office that says, "The Tree of Life is not a Michael Bay movie. If you can't appreciate the opera, the ballet, or a symphony, you probably won't appreciate this movie, so we recommend you see something else."

 

RedFive said:

I felt like I experienced my childhood over again. 

Is that what your dad is like...? :(

 

 

Post
#519916
Topic
anothe example of lucas changing things to appeal to a new generation lightsaber dueling styles of OT vs PT
Time

ToscheStation said:

TV's Frink said:

ToscheStation said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

It's worthy to note, however, that the Windu vs. Palpatine duel had next to no acrobatics (only one short frame of CG Palps doing some frog flip against a desk), and it was one of the most tense, intense duels in the prequels.

All of Palpatine's terrible facial expressions would like a "word" with you.

 

   lol.

 TV's Frink said:  "The Titanic would like a word with you."

 make that two "would like a word with you" references.......

....hmmm, sounds familiar.

I never claimed I don't recycle jokes.

     Two negatives* don't make a right....

    * "I never" "I don't"

 

Nothing wrong there, grammatically. It's a rhetorical figure of speech known as a "litote", an understatement that often uses double negatives to deny the opposite of the case.

Post
#519582
Topic
anothe example of lucas changing things to appeal to a new generation lightsaber dueling styles of OT vs PT
Time

For the most part, I try to focus on the content rather than the person. hal's delivery left something to be desired, but I agree with the basic premise that the saber fights in the PT are more acrobatic in part to appeal to a younger generation accustomed to heavily-choreographed dance-like fight sequences and "wire fu"-style acrobatics. I also agree with TheBoost that there is more to it than just that, and as is often done with Star Wars, you can point to enough in-universe reasons for the change to satisfy most fans.