logo Sign In

asterisk8

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Oct-2007
Last activity
29-Jun-2025
Posts
856

Post History

Post
#551292
Topic
I want my kids to see the unaltered Original Trilogy in a real theater
Time

Mavimao said:


You don't want 60 fps. The reason is that your image will start looking like a soap opera instead of a movie.

 

I'd actually love to see someone provide a detailed explanation with examples of the "soap opera effect" when discussing higher frame rates instead of just throwing out the phrase "soap opera" and thinking that settles it. It's the kind of FUD that makes people think the new Hobbit film is going to look bad because it's being shot at 48fps.

A higher frame rate does not automatically mean a "video-y" soap opera look. NFL games are shot at 60fps, and do not look like a soap opera on my TV. Same with the evening news.

Post
#551255
Topic
Song Of The South - many projects, much info & discussion thread (Released)
Time

Moth3r said:

Thought it might be useful to post a summary, seeing as this thread was started over two years ago.

Song of the South DVD versions

• Piratebay/mininova (superhappyfun?) version - sourced from Japanese laserdisc, has burned-in subtitles during the songs.

• “Coal Black Easter Egg” Version & Cyber-EFX version - both sourced from Hong Kong/Korean/Chinese LD or UK VHS, no-one knows exactly. No burned-in subtitles, but poor video quality. Small selection of extras.

• Mentor version - barebones DVD encode, sourced from DVB cap off BBC broadcast. Best picture quality, but some interlacing/blending issues with PAL conversion.

• Doctor M, JoeyO & Rowman 2-DVD release - disc one is the movie sourced from Mentor's DVD and restored to NTSC, disc two features a comprehensive selection of extras and special features.

I think these are the main versions out there, if I've got anything wrong, please post in this thread.

Thanks for this list, it's what I was looking for.

Is the Doctor M/JoeyO/Rowman version of the BBC broadcast available anywhere? I see the original Mentor release is available on myspleen, but I'd prefer it in NTSC. Thanks!

Post
#550217
Topic
The Scary Door
Time

Imagine, if you will, that you are in your room imagining that you are imagining that you are in your room, but actually, you are not in your room, but instead in a place that looks so much like your room that you cannot tell the difference, except for the fact that you are naked and it smells vaguely of... The Scary Door.

 

You are about to enter a place of ridiculous evil, a place of unbridled villainy, where those who seek good and harmony are tickled until they stop enjoying it and ask you to stop. But you don't stop. You just keep on tickling them forever, because you have entered... The Scary Door.

Post
#549837
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

greenpenguino said:

But the story is just, bleeugh.

Don't get me started, because I couldn't disagree with you more, and could easily fill up 10 paragraphs explaining why, but I won't.

Considering your opinion of 2001, we'll just chalk it up to different strokes.

 

The Thing (1982) - 8/10 blood samples

Post
#547112
Topic
Last web series/tv show seen
Time

Johnny Ringo said:

FRINGE - I'm a big fan but it's been pretty dull this season, looks like things are about to pick up a bit.

AGREED! Very excited about what's to come. I had a weird feeling at the end of Friday's episode that [spoiler] is going to end up becoming a villain... I'm not sure if I really want or really don't want that to happen.

 

I'm 3 episodes into Twin Peaks, as part of my chronological journey through David Lynch's career. I've already decided this series is directly or indirectly responsible for every great television drama that came after it (and some comedies too). This shit is seriously inspired.

Post
#545730
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

captainsolo said:

George Harrison: Living In The Material World.

Don't start this if you decide you want to do anything else all day...not only is it long, but it sure as hell makes you think a lot. The problem is, I just never felt like Marty was getting at everything that should've been there. For something that was over 200 minutes you'd think there would be a bit more focus and detail, but I still can't help feeling like there was some skipping over done.

All in all, a really great tribute to a visionary.

"God, it's like Barbara ****ing Walters in here isn't it?"'-Ringo

At least a 3/4, it's on HBO and also found it on OnDemand services currently in two parts.

I was disappointed by this documentary. Not that I didn't enjoy it, I was deeply moved by it at times, and can't help but love anything that fauns over the Beatles' legacy, but it was this fawning that bothered me coming from Scorsese. The doc played like a promotional piece written by Harrison's publicist. Everything that could've been considered controversial about George Harrison was danced around or completely avoided. His womanizing, his temper, his copyright suit... I just feel that the best documentaries maintain a certain journalistic distance from their subject, and don't shy away from the unflattering moments, but this doc did nothing of the kind. Scorsese handled Harrison with kid gloves, and as a result the portrait felt unfinished. As I read in another review, it's part of a trend in recent documentaries that whitewash their subjects as if made by a devoted fan instead of a critical documentarian. Apparently, this is nothing new from Scorsese, but it's the first of his rock legend documentaries I've seen.

Post
#545728
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

althor1138 said:

I'm about due for another read of rendezvous with rama.  Might start it tonight actually.  Anybody who hasn't read it definitely needs to.  If you like sci-fi that is.

Read Rendezvous With Rama earlier this year. Finished it in a single Sunday, I couldn't put it down. I was hard to avoid reading the sequel, but my cousin BEGGED me not to do it, lest its "awfulness" pale the beauty of Rendezvous.

Post
#541636
Topic
My Top 10 Reasons ROTJ sucks
Time

I think his points were very well-articulated and supported, and yet I'm not surprised to see responses that amount to, "You're wrong, I don't care about the things that bother you and I think ROTJ is awesome!"

Obvious brushstrokes in a matte painting on an HD screen in 2011 is a valid criticism, especially when mattes have been selectively replaced elsewhere. The lack of dramatic tension is also a very valid point that he effectively supports, even referring to earlier drafts of the script to show how such issues could've been resolved.

 

"Doesn't make or break the movie."

Maybe not on his own, but then again, that wasn't his point. None of these criticisms on their own make or break the movie, but when considered all together, they form a pretty reasonable critique of the quality of ROTJ.

 

"2. Ewoks are awesome. Get over it."

What kind of response is that? You're just flaming the guy for articulating his opinion in an intelligent and reasonable way.

 

sonnyboo, thanks for sharing your review.

Post
#541609
Topic
'Chemical castration' for pedophiles
Time

twooffour said:

 

That's a common cliché, but it isn't accurate - some people's minds ARE wired in a way that drives them to do evil all the time.

 

If a criminal's mind is just wired that way, can they really be punished for doing something they have no control over? The threat of the death penalty or chemical castration wouldn't be a deterrent to someone "wired" to commit criminal acts, and deterrence is usually the primary reason given for instituting harsh punishments.

The trouble with attributing criminal behavior to hard-wiring is that it puts them in the same class as the mentally disabled. They have a disorder, a "malfunctioning" brain, which forces them to behave in ways they are not capable of changing. They become victims of their own malfunctioning brain, no more responsible for the crime they commit than a person who has a stroke while driving and kills a pedestrian.

Additionally, I don't believe you can call a person hard-wired to misbehave "evil". The word implies a willful/conscious/deliberate choice to disregard moral code and cause harm. Someone hard-wired like you suggest can't help it. Would it be appropriate to call an autistic person an "asshole" for ignoring you? They can't help it either.

Not trying to start an argument, just putting some thoughts out there.

Post
#530855
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Bingowings said:

Thanks for the recommendations.

No problem! Just what I could think of off the top of my head. I did IMDb's 30 Horror Movies in October challenge a couple years ago and did a big block of haunted house movies.

You're right about The Changeling. I think it's worth watching if you're a fan of the subgenre, but it isn't great. The Innocents deserves to be on any haunted house movie list despite what can be read between the lines at the end. It is a spooky film. I love The Others and recommend it as often as I can. It's one of the most effective haunted house movies I've ever seen.

Of course I knew I was forgetting one good one, and it's the one you liked the most. Let's Scare Jessica to Death is really great!

If you don't mind silent films, I recommend The Cat and the Canary. The character of "Mammy Pleasant" creeps me out.

Post
#530701
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Bingowings said:

I watched it partly because I had recently dug out an old favourite of mine, The Legend Of Hell House (1973) and I was trying to find another good creepy haunted house film which isn't The Haunting (1963).

Any recommendations out there? 

The Changeling
The Others
The Innocents
Woman In Black
The Orphanage
Suspiria