- Post
- #312007
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/312007/action/topic#312007
- Time
adywan
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 15-Mar-2006
- Last activity
- 16-Nov-2025
- Posts
- 5,185
Post History
- Post
- #312000
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/312000/action/topic#312000
- Time
- Post
- #311993
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311993/action/topic#311993
- Time
I really feel like shooting myself because of this.
- Post
- #311986
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311986/action/topic#311986
- Time
Originally posted by: Moth3r
cbaka,
I don't know who provides your Usenet access - however I had the same problem going through my ISP's (Virgin Media) newsgroup access. But on checking through Astraweb - who I also use (pre-pay) and the files are there. It doesn't show up on Virgin Media because Ady posted to a.b.dvdr, and crossposted to a.b.starwars. Since the free service offered by VM doesn't carry the high traffic groups (a.b.dvdr being one of them) the posts were dropped.
@Ady: as a VirginMedia customer myself, I'd be grateful if, when you post the DVD9, you put a.b.starwars first in the group list.
cbaka,
I don't know who provides your Usenet access - however I had the same problem going through my ISP's (Virgin Media) newsgroup access. But on checking through Astraweb - who I also use (pre-pay) and the files are there. It doesn't show up on Virgin Media because Ady posted to a.b.dvdr, and crossposted to a.b.starwars. Since the free service offered by VM doesn't carry the high traffic groups (a.b.dvdr being one of them) the posts were dropped.
@Ady: as a VirginMedia customer myself, I'd be grateful if, when you post the DVD9, you put a.b.starwars first in the group list.
How do i do that? i use yencpowerpost to upload to usenet and you can only select the groups you want to post it to and it orders them alphabetically. is there another program that i can use that i can set the group order manually?
- Post
- #311969
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311969/action/topic#311969
- Time
- Post
- #311915
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311915/action/topic#311915
- Time
- Post
- #311881
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311881/action/topic#311881
- Time
Originally posted by: Sevb32
So if I use DVD FLICK to burn this on a DVD5, will I have any problems getting all the material on it without bad compression picture quality? Is there a way I can put just the film on one DVD and the extras on another DVD? DVDFLICK has a setting for NTSC, if this is the PAL version will I have any trouble converting it? Yes, I will be fist to tell you what an idiot I am when it comes to this stuff.
So if I use DVD FLICK to burn this on a DVD5, will I have any problems getting all the material on it without bad compression picture quality? Is there a way I can put just the film on one DVD and the extras on another DVD? DVDFLICK has a setting for NTSC, if this is the PAL version will I have any trouble converting it? Yes, I will be fist to tell you what an idiot I am when it comes to this stuff.
The one out tomorrow is a DVD-5 so it will fit on a single layer DVD. You won't have to shrink it. If you need NTSC then you'll have to wait a week or so until the NTSC DVD-5 is available. I wouldn't shrink the DVD-9 just for the extras. There are extras on the DVD-5 but shrinking the whole DVD-9 won't give you very good results. The bitrate for the movie would be down to about 3200kbps (maybe even less) in order to keep the extras, which isn't very good
- Post
- #311864
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311864/action/topic#311864
- Time
Originally posted by: Sevb32
Is it much further Papa Smurf?
Is it much further Papa Smurf?
I've just got a few tweaks to the audio track to do, which should only take this evening to do, burn the final test copy, watch it all the way through and its done. No easter egg though. there just wasn't enough space left. I'll save that for the DVD-9. Should all be good to go either later this evening or tomorrow at the latest
- Post
- #311853
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311853/action/topic#311853
- Time
- Post
- #311773
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311773/action/topic#311773
- Time
Originally posted by: Kurgan
Is there a higher quality version of this cover available? This one has a lot of jpeg compression artefacts. Just curious!
Is there a higher quality version of this cover available? This one has a lot of jpeg compression artefacts. Just curious!
Yeh, i just checked it out and it does suffer badly from compression artifacts. Is there any chance you could post a different version with the jpeg compression setting set to maximum & possibly with higher res too, unless that is the res that you worked on. It would be a shame to have such a good cover in poor quality.
- Post
- #311731
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311731/action/topic#311731
- Time
Originally posted by: discostewart
Will the dvd-9 compression of the actual film be the same on dvd-9?
In which case surely we coudl all just amke a disc 2 (dvd-5)
Once again adywan thanks for all the hard work, im most excited for this weekend.
Hopefully it will be up on torrent (i use piratebay)
Will the dvd-9 compression of the actual film be the same on dvd-9?
In which case surely we coudl all just amke a disc 2 (dvd-5)
Once again adywan thanks for all the hard work, im most excited for this weekend.
Hopefully it will be up on torrent (i use piratebay)
no it won't be. the average bitrate for the movie on the DVD-5 is 4200 whereas on the DVD-9 it is 6500
- Post
- #311724
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311724/action/topic#311724
- Time
Originally posted by: RoccondilRinon
Do you know yet when the DVD-9 is likely to be ready, Ady?
Do you know yet when the DVD-9 is likely to be ready, Ady?
The DVD-9 versions could be a couple of months away yet. I have a lot of work to do for those.
- Post
- #311714
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311714/action/topic#311714
- Time
Anyway, back to the edit. I'm almost finished. Just a few tweaks on the structure and the PAL DVD-5 is done. The ESB trailer on the DVD will be slightly different than the one posted in my ESB REVISITED thread. I have tweaked the Emperor. His hood has been replaced with the one from ROTJ and he looks so much better now. This weekend will definitely see the DVD appear
- Post
- #311542
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311542/action/topic#311542
- Time
-2004: We have a new enemy, (camera front view of Emperor) the young rebel who destroyed the Death Star. (camera front view of Vader from the shoulders up) I have no doubt this boy is the offspring of Anakin Skywalker. (camera front view of Emperor)
I will be changing this line to just "young Skywalker". I would have preferred it to be "Luke Skywalker" but no where in the saga does the Emperor say "Luke"
As for the vane it is a bit of a design flaw. I think that Luke was supposed to have reached there through the long tunnel but they put the support pole in the wrong position on the matte which caused confusion. A small tweak to the matte should be able to fix this.
The Obi-Wan line about Yoda i would prefer to keep this as it is. I don't want to have to changed much in the OT just because of the mess that the POT caused. I have some plans to fix this error in the PT and not have OBi-Wan as Qui-Gon's padawan but instead have Yopa call Obi-Wan his padawan in some instances in TPM or maybe just omit the whole padawan thing with Obi-Wan altogether
- Post
- #311512
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311512/action/topic#311512
- Time
Just started the painting for the cover today. It should only take me a couple of days to complete.
- Post
- #311377
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311377/action/topic#311377
- Time
16:9 anamorphic
5.1 Dolby digital mix
English subtitles
Spanish subtitles
French subtitles
Dutch subtitles
Deleted Scene - Jabba the Hutt
Deleted Scene - Jabba the Hutt in 3D
Episode IV Revisited first look trailer
1st official trailer
Final Trailer
Sneak peak at Episode V Revisited
Revisited Changes & Fixes Trivia subtitle track
Easter Egg
Full Motion Menus
The Pal DVD will be the first version available with the NTSC following within a few days. I'm just waiting for the Dutch subs to be sent to me ( which should be completed by Thursday) so at the Weekend the PAL version will be here.
On another note, i have been recently receiving both Email & PMs from various people, most of whom i have no clue who the hell they are, asking for copies of the DVD-9 but saying that they can't join in the PIF chain because they don't have a dual layer burner but offering to put some money into my account towards the next edit. Some have even asked that i send them a copy with full cover artwork, boxed with printed label and personally signed by me. Some offers have actually been the same as it would cost to buy a dual layer burner plus discs so have proven to me that they think that they can pay me for a copy. I'm afraid this will NOT be happening. I will be sending out discs in order to start the PIF chain and a few to other members that have helped with the edit ( not financially). It will also be available through usenet and torrents. You can get it from there if you can't be part of the chain. So please stop asking and stop the money offers. I will not reply to any of them
I have also received a few very fake cease & desist letters ( come on guys. using a free email account. how thick do you think i am) and also a lot of threatening hate mail in the past few days. i guess i have rattled a few cages.
- Post
- #311299
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311299/action/topic#311299
- Time
Originally posted by: Kurgan
So how close are you to buying that new hard drive, ady?
So how close are you to buying that new hard drive, ady?
The hard drive is being delivered on monday so a couple of days after that the PAL DVD-5 will be available
- Post
- #311091
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311091/action/topic#311091
- Time
- Post
- #311021
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311021/action/topic#311021
- Time
Originally posted by: OBtwosy
Hey Ady!
How's the DVD-5 coming? I'm doing a screening next week with some friends and am wondering if I'll be showing the XviD or if the DVD will be available.
honestly, I'm not trying to push you man - just wondering... and salivating.
Hey Ady!
How's the DVD-5 coming? I'm doing a screening next week with some friends and am wondering if I'll be showing the XviD or if the DVD will be available.
honestly, I'm not trying to push you man - just wondering... and salivating.
It's almost there. there's some more work to do on it (i may have French subs for it now too so i need to change the structure and menus slightly) i'm awaiting the funds to clear from paypal so i can get the drive and then about a day after the PAL DVD-5 should be good to go with the NTSC a few days after that
- Post
- #311014
- Topic
- Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311014/action/topic#311014
- Time
- Post
- #311011
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311011/action/topic#311011
- Time
Originally posted by: Max_Rebo
are those red/blue or red/green glasses? because it didn't quite work properly through the red/blue ones I used, I could still see two of everything!
Originally posted by: adywan
Oh yeh, have your 3D glasses ready (i used my Family Guy ones)
Get Your 3D Glasses Out
Oh yeh, have your 3D glasses ready (i used my Family Guy ones)
Get Your 3D Glasses Out
are those red/blue or red/green glasses? because it didn't quite work properly through the red/blue ones I used, I could still see two of everything!
I'm using the red/blue ones. it is still a work in progress and i haven't got the alignment quite right yet but if you have seen the family guy 3d section then you still see doubling happening no matter what. its just a limit with this type of conversion but i've done some more corrections since then and here's a snapshot as it stands now
- Post
- #311007
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311007/action/topic#311007
- Time
Originally posted by: Isley
Ady please check your PMs I asked you something
Ady please check your PMs I asked you something
I didn't get it but it could be because my inbox is full. could you send it to my hotmail address instead please (same address i use for the donations)
- Post
- #311003
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/311003/action/topic#311003
- Time
Originally posted by: Sluggo
wow!
might I ask why that particular scene?
wow!
might I ask why that particular scene?
I was working on the colour correction for this deleted scene for the dvd and just decided to see if it was possible for me to convert it to some sort of 3D. its still just a test but there is hell of a lot of work involved so i don't really want to do a scene thats too complex
- Post
- #310998
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/310998/action/topic#310998
- Time
Oh yeh, have your 3D glasses ready (i used my Family Guy ones)
Get Your 3D Glasses Out
- Post
- #310828
- Topic
- STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/310828/action/topic#310828
- Time
Originally posted by: Joshua_Blue
In my view, the shield is only impenetrable by lasers and other similar weapons. The ships can pass through the shield normally they just cannot fire through it. That is why the land beyond the horizon of the Hoth rebel base, out of the reach of the rebel fire, and attack with walkers. If they landed directly in front of the rebel base, they would be vulnerable during landing.
Well actually not even ships can get through the shield. Don't forget that they have to lower the shield for the transports to escape so my thought on this is that once the shield is lowered the walkers can slip through .
An interesting idea popped up earlier in the thread about seeing drop ships deploying the AT-AT's. But i feel that adding anything like that in would ruin the reveal of the AT-AT's when we see them through the macrobinoulars and would just be adding something in to the film that really doesn't need to be there. That's the thing i'm trying to avoid and that's the thing that Lucasfilm did with the SE's.
Also adding any sort of vision during Luke's training won't be happening. That's another thing we don't need to see . Luke describes his vision perfectly.
yes, i'm going to fix that error.
Originally posted by: Owen-Lars-Kenobi
4. I also like the shots added involving Vader's shuttle and arrival on the Executor, but I understand how they disrupt the flow. Is there any way that the sequence's timing could be reworked in order to keep the shots?
In my view, the shield is only impenetrable by lasers and other similar weapons. The ships can pass through the shield normally they just cannot fire through it. That is why the land beyond the horizon of the Hoth rebel base, out of the reach of the rebel fire, and attack with walkers. If they landed directly in front of the rebel base, they would be vulnerable during landing.
Well actually not even ships can get through the shield. Don't forget that they have to lower the shield for the transports to escape so my thought on this is that once the shield is lowered the walkers can slip through .
An interesting idea popped up earlier in the thread about seeing drop ships deploying the AT-AT's. But i feel that adding anything like that in would ruin the reveal of the AT-AT's when we see them through the macrobinoulars and would just be adding something in to the film that really doesn't need to be there. That's the thing i'm trying to avoid and that's the thing that Lucasfilm did with the SE's.
Also adding any sort of vision during Luke's training won't be happening. That's another thing we don't need to see . Luke describes his vision perfectly.
Originally posted by: Owen-Lars-Kenobi
1. I really like the SE Wampa stuff. I hope it doesn't change, but it is your edit ady, as many have said, do what you want.
The Wampa scene will be cut down. It will be closer to the original version than the SE but i haven't panned exactly how i'm going to do that just yet.
Originally posted by: Owen-Lars-Kenobi
2. About that window in cloud city that disappears. I would really like to see the window stay, if you can find a way to matte in the window convincingly. I really like what was done to cloud city in the SE, except for this error in continuity.
1. I really like the SE Wampa stuff. I hope it doesn't change, but it is your edit ady, as many have said, do what you want.
The Wampa scene will be cut down. It will be closer to the original version than the SE but i haven't panned exactly how i'm going to do that just yet.
Originally posted by: Owen-Lars-Kenobi
2. About that window in cloud city that disappears. I would really like to see the window stay, if you can find a way to matte in the window convincingly. I really like what was done to cloud city in the SE, except for this error in continuity.
yes, i'm going to fix that error.
Originally posted by: Owen-Lars-Kenobi
4. I also like the shots added involving Vader's shuttle and arrival on the Executor, but I understand how they disrupt the flow. Is there any way that the sequence's timing could be reworked in order to keep the shots?
Those shots i absolutely hate. It totally ruins the pace of the sequence and i'm afraid they will be going.
One last thing. There will be no PT music added to ESB.