logo Sign In

Ziz

User Group
Members
Join date
20-Apr-2008
Last activity
18-Jun-2019
Posts
1,290

Post History

Post
#337639
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

Star Wars: Revisited Disc Art EXTREME!!!!

When someone asks me to send them a copy of SW:R, I make it a multi-disc set - DVD9 is the "Full" version and Purist Edition is the "Bonus" disc.

To that end, I created a plethora of disc art variations based on Ady's original and a modified Purist version in green posted by someone named "snaggletooth" earlier in this thread.

Well, here now in one 30MB RAR file is all 36 of my disc art variations.  Well, 34 1/2.  Ady's original is in there for the sake of completeness, but obviously I can't take credit for that version.  I also created my own version of Snaggletooth's green Purist label so that the color tone would match the others.

All together, there are 9 different colors, silver and gold Star Wars logos and regular and Purist Edition markings.  I didn't put any NTSC, PAL or Region Code markings on there, so they'll be accurate no matter which version you have.  You can always add those yourself if you really want them.

Post
#337617
Topic
Info: FanEdit.org is GONE!!!!
Time

There is another way the industry could use fan edits to their advantage - as a source for hiring potential new editors for future projects.  In effect, any fan-made artwork - edits, song parodies, DVD case covers, fan films, CG renderings, and so on - display that person's talents to the industry.  Why isn't the industry then smart enough to look at this pool of talent and make job offers to them?  Just because a film or TV show was produced by people who were paid to do it doesn't mean it was done well.  There's always room for improvement to some degree.

The existence of a fan edit also doesn't eliminate the existence of the original.  They're not being distributed in stores, selling better than the studio version.  The size of the audience for fan edits is infinitesimally miniscule compared to the general population that buys and rents DVDs in the first place, so it's not like they're a threat from the perspective of confusing the public as to which is which.

The industry has such a selfish, controlling, dictatorial attitude that they manage to piss off the very same people they depend on to buy their wares in the first place.  Coming down on any fan-based work that attempts to improve or build on the original in some way is like doing extra credit for homework and getting detention for your efforts.

Post
#337615
Topic
kevin kerner vs. john williams
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

Williams did write and score music for television even though he cannot be labaled as a tv composer, he was a movie composer of symphonic orchetstral scores.  The Scale of his works written for the LSO is not even comparable to a small tv hollywood orchestra.  Kiner is a tv composer, and as such writes for a different medium and his scores are tonally different completely.

 

You really suffer from a terminal case of Cranial Insertus Analatus, don't you?

John Williams at IMDb

Williams did PLENTY of TV scores early in his career, most notably the Irwin Allen 60's series Lost In Space, Time Tunnel and Land Of The Giants.

 

Kevin Kiner at IMDb

You're also not comparing them on the same level.  Williams has twice the time in the industry as Kiner, so naturally his body of work is going to overshadow a lot of the younger guys.

 

Joel McNeely

The fair comparison is Kiner and McNeely, who did Shadows Of The Empire.  Both of them have about the same amount of time in the industry, and both of them are re-interpreting Williams' work on the SW films for the projects they were assigned to.

 

That being said, the only reason McNeely might rate higher is because his score was done during a different attitude in the history of SW EU.  Shadows was designed to look and feel like it was always a part of the SW universe but we just never heard about it until now.  Clone Wars is trying for more of its own identity, part of SW but purposely having a different artistic style.

Post
#337356
Topic
Info: FanEdit.org is GONE!!!!
Time

I've been talking to boon and Ghostcut in the chat room over there.  Their plans are to move the site to hosting services outside the US, with the first priority being the torrent files.  RapidShare is already outside the US, so that's safe.  Links won't be back until the whole site can be moved to a non-US host though.  Until then, FE will be an "information resource" only.

Post
#337292
Topic
Info: FanEdit.org is GONE!!!!
Time

I think this place is safe for now because there's no edits here to download, just talk about them.  FE had Rapidshare links and their own torrent site.

Their forums are still up though, www.faneditforum.com, just with links to FE downloads removed.  There's already ideas circulating about how to bring things back, or at least some kind of partial revival.

Post
#337278
Topic
Info: FanEdit.org is GONE!!!!
Time

Yet more proof that to the entertainment industry, money is just a smokescreen. What they want is ultimate control.

Remember a few years ago when the whole MP3/file sharing controversy started? Napster was at the center of it, accused by the RIAA as supporting piracy.

I saw a news special about the whole issue where one of the guys who developed one of the file sharing apps, Grokster, went to the RIAA and said "You want a legal file sharing system? We'll show you how." They turned him down.

Now look at the numbers. At its peak, Napster had about 80,000,000 users. If HALF of them signed up for an unlimited download service at a flat $10 a month, that's $400,000,000 a month - $4,800,000,000 a year - with virtually no material distribution expense of pressing CDs, printing artwork, CD cases, packaging or shipping issues.

RIAA turned it down.

They turned down $5 BILLION A YEAR.

Don't tell me they're concerned about the money, or even the "we own this, you don't" copyright argument.

Post
#337206
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Yeah, but the first thing Maul does upon seeing Obi and Qui is fire up his saber, so it's obvious he's not in the mood for conversation.  O & Q's first priority at that point is self defense and disarm the enemy.  Once they have him subdued, then they can question him.  Unfortunately, it became a life-and-death struggle and they never got to that point.

Post
#337072
Topic
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Thread
Time

The branching timeline/alternate universe thing is something they did on an episode of ST:TNG once.  It was the one where Worf was shifting from one universe to another because of some technobabble frequency something or other from Geordi's visor.

At one point, Data explained it as "The results of every decision we make or don't make create an alternate universe and timeline, creating an infinitely branching universe and timelines where all possible outcomes occur in one form or another" - don't remember the exact dialogue, but that was the logic.

Post
#337071
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Rhikter said:

Yesterday, I was thinking about a complaint I had read some time ago.  Someone was arguing against the elaborately choreographed saber duels in the PT because they were not as passive as the ones in the OT.  This reminded me of a comment about "Artistic License" I made some time ago.

I bring this up because some people need to seriously consider exactly what it is they're talking about when they make arguments like this "Saber Duel" one.  We cannot think about forms of art - especially film - in a purely logical manner.  As layman as it may sound, the fact is that, if we did, movies would be extremely boring and unoriginal.  You must have a harmony between your artistic and logical vision.  Yes, the battles in the PT could have be done similarly to those in the OT, but that would not have been artistically reflective of the world GL was trying to create for the PT; that is a world where the Jedi order is thriving and at it's highest.  The elegance of the PT duels reflects this, just as the passive battles of the OT reflect a dark oppresive world where Luke received his training from an elderly Kenobi and Yoda, and Vader has asthma.

Actually, there's a very simple and logical explanation for the difference in fight styles between the trilogies.

"Real world" - on the OT, they just made it up as they went along and had a basic knowledge of fight styles but didn't worry about making it the "ultimate battle" because the focus was on who the characters were and why they were fighting, not the fight itself.

"In universe" - in the OT, the only people using sabers are two old men who haven't done it in 20 years who are way past their prime and a kid who's running more on instinct than training.  In the PT, you've got young, strong Jedis at the peak of their careers and physical fitness, so naturally they're going to be more energetic and creative in their fight styles.

 

Post
#336994
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
jlw515 said:
negative1 said:
rcb said:

where can i get adywans dvd version of anh revisited? i'll mail a check if i need to.

 

 downloads : http://fanedit.org/517/

later

-1

Ok evidently I am doing something wrong. Even from the link you gave, I can't figure out how to download this thing. Is it only available for download or can I buy a dvd. And if its only available for download. How do I download the entire thing. The only thing I got from that link was like the opening menu to a dvd.

 

Jason

 

When you get there, scroll down past all the case artwork (those track listing inserts were created by yours truly, btw.  Need to get them to put my name on it.)

Click on one of the links that says "100MB Archives", depending on the format you want.  That will bring up a list of Rapidshare links.  Click on those until you have all the necessary files.

Once you've got them all, use WinRAR (a Zip/UnZip type program) to open the #1 file.  That will subsequently open the rest of them in sequence.

You'll end up with an ISO file (unless you got the XVID AVI version).  Go into Nero or some other DVD burning program and choose "Burn Image to Disc".  Put your blank in your drive, choose that ISO file and you're on your way.