logo Sign In

Zion

User Group
Members
Join date
23-Sep-2004
Last activity
28-Nov-2025
Posts
2,001

Post History

Post
#76805
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
I think things are a little different with those older bt based cards. The newer conexant ones seem to be a little more compatible with different software. I've had success using a number of different capture programs, including virtualdubmod and virtualvcr. But this issue of the missing video on the sides is a little different it seems.

One con about this MSI card is that the included PVR software doesn't seem to work with Windows XP. I've tried a number of other programs like SageTV and ChrisTV, but to no avail. I don't really care about the TV aspect of the card that much though, and Media Player Classic (believe it or not) actually works well as a video player, so I can still watch TV through my cable box.

So I guess I'm not going to worry too much about my TV software not functioning if I change the capture card drivers.
Post
#76780
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: tellan
Zion, another question or two about your sound approach. I am always intrigued when someone says they are going to capture using one set of discs and use the sound from another because the spectre of sound sync rears its head.

I was lucky in that my capture didn't have an issue. I captured sound and video at the same time and it was always synced up correctly. On the other hand if you start capturing from different source material I can never see how the person can figure it out enough to make it sync beyond looking and listening at it.

In your case, are you going to sync up your base wavs first? then create the different sound streams based on this one copy of sound, or do it by some other means?


What I'll probably end up doing is using the audio from the same source LD's (faces set) since it seems like the sound quality on the '85 mix LD's isn't as good as the THX versions. I probably won't be capturing the audio and video at the same time though, unless I determine that I can't sync them up properly. I'm going to create a master .wav file and make sure that it syncs up correctly to the video before I create the different dvd audio tracks from it.
Post
#76755
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
ALL dvd players can output the DTS bitstream. The question is whether or not the preprocessor or receiver will have decoding capabilities. In the event that it doesn't, the dolby surround track will still be on the disc. That's why I'm putting it on there. On the other hand, I still don't know if the created 5.1 sound will be worth listening to. A side by side comparrison will be the judge of that. If it is, it's not like we're talking about normal 192k 5.1 audio here. A 1536k DTS stream is the lowest form of compression you can get out of a DVD and 10 times the quality of a normal mp3.
Post
#76704
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
It's a MSI TV @nywhere Master card (priceless? ). I bought it because it has the same awesome capture chip as my Winfast card (Conexant CX23883) but the connector is directly on the card rather than via a multi-in cable. I don't know if the quality difference I'm seeing is because of the card itself or the lack of a multi-in cable. But I don't really care, it's the results that matter.

Oh, and this just in - my CLD-D704 is finally here. Time to get down to business...
Post
#76542
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
I don't see why a DVD player wouldn't be able to handle it. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but as long as the combined audio/video/subpicture bitrate doesn't exceed 10Mbps, it should be fine. Besides, isn't PCM's bit rate just as high?

As for the music-only track, I recieved a copy of the soundtracks from Echo3 so I'll probably use that to create the dvd tracks.
Post
#76528
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
I haven't really done much with sound yet, but I've been throwing a few ideas around lately. My first thought is to have a stereo (pro-logic surround) PCM track. I'm also thinking of trying to create a 5.1 DTS track from the pro-logic audio. If I like the way it sounds, I may just 86 the PCM track and go with 1536k DTS 5.1 which is almost exactly the same file size. Of course I'll be capturing the audio digitally via coax.

As it stands right now, this is what I want on my DVD's:

PCM 2.0 surround (uncompressed) or DTS 5.1 surround (1536k)
Dolby Digital 2.0 (192k)
Dolby Digital 2.0 Commentary (192k)
Dolby Digital 2.0 Music Only (192k)

Those are just ideas in my head at this point. Right now I'm more worried about the audio syncing up correctly and whether I really need to be capturing the audio and video at the same time. So far I've been capturing video only.
Post
#75928
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time
Yeah, definitely not approval, I just happen to know they've seen the site. The fact that they haven't shut it down is tacit approval for the posting of screencaps that they could revoke at any instant.

_Mike

Same thing with my site. I got a nice email from them a few weeks back about my image archive having Insider images, but they didn't say anything about the DVD project section, so I'll take that as approval.
Post
#75159
Topic
Info Wanted: What other LDs are you all transferring?
Time
I just got Sealab 2021 Seasons 1-3 off myspleen and I'm currently creating DVD's for each season. Of course the quality won't be as good as the real dvd's since the source I'm working with is 512x354 XviD, but hey, it's an old cartoon anyway.

I'm hoping to whip up some quick main and chapter menus for these too. I can post screenshots when I'm done if you guys want.


Edit: man, waiting 26 hours for TMPGEnc to encode just under 2 hours of video kinda sucks...
Post
#74955
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
Now, all bets are off if there is significant noise coming from outside sources! There I'd imagine the MC cable's improved shielding, etc., would eliminate a large quantity of outside noise, which itself could conceivably add substantially to the picture quality degradation. So there you could be looking at the cable eliminating 75% of the source of, say, 10% of the noise, for an overall improvement of about 8%.

Which I have to say, I would pursue.


Now consider for a moment that you live in a dormitory like I do. Right off the bat, you've got a lot of noise coming from the power outlets. And even though I've got one of the better Monster power centers, I still get a significant amount of noise into my video sources. Add to that the fact that I've got a pluthera of wires going in and out and crossing all over the place behind my computer desk, things are bound to get a little messy. When I compare my monster video cable to a standard one, I can see a big difference.
Post
#74771
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
I also discovered there is no difference between the cheapest RCA cable and Monster Cable's near-top-of-the-line fancy-ass thing.

Ok buddy, you've just crossed the line with that remark. There is no way in hell that a 2 dollar video cable from Radio Shack is going to transfer the video signal as efficiently as a high quality dual-shielded Monster Cable. If you're not seeing a difference, it's because you're lucking out and not getting any noise introduced into your signal.

Nothing more to see here. Move along.