logo Sign In

Zion

User Group
Members
Join date
23-Sep-2004
Last activity
20-Dec-2025
Posts
2,002

Post History

Post
#90230
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time
I know that you have very eloquently stated that your intention is to preserve the 'experience' rather than the film as closely as it actually was when released, and I'm in agreeance with you up to a point there... there's those that seem to obsess about it far too much... I mean really, does it really matter if it says Episode IV or not at the begining of the crawl? How does that affect the actual movie... What I'm a little iffy about (don't get me wrong though, I'm very interested in your final version) is the 'fixing' of effects they didn't get right back then, like the speeder smudge under it, or the little jumps due to cuts for effects etc... I'm all for being able to still see those things as it was what was achievable THEN... from a film history point of view, being able to say to someone "See, see how great this film is, how amazing it really does look? And this was all done in 1976!" is surely of major worth for future generations of film buffs and students etc.? With the actual releases that Lucas provides it's a case of "See, see how good that bit... no, that bit there... no, not that bit... wait, ok this bit, and that over there, but not the windows there... all of that, well, minus the CG creature over there... that was done in 1976! Oh, wait... no... no, that was 'fixed up in 1997'"... it doesn't sit well.... Your version, while not having the CG etc (Well, actually it does now doesn't it... really, with the laser flash), does have 'clean ups' of original effects... not to their original versions, but better than original...


The answer to this would fall along the lines of "you're never going to see it anyway so why do you care what I do." Don't expect a warm fuzzy discussion about this, as there seem to be two distinct perceptions of what preservation is. The purists believe in preservation in film history a la "you can't change anything about the film because it wasn't like that in '77. The other school of thought, which is where people like Mike's feelings lie, says that you should preserve the experience. Things that distract you from enjoying the story and the characters such as crappy effects shots can be fixed because we have the ability and desire to do so.

(completely off topic, but for some reason if I edit a post in one of the sticky threads it goes to the top of the list. wierd.)
Post
#89367
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
Depends on what shape the video is in. If it needs sharpening or denoising, I'll do that. Other than that I'll be doing color correction and spot removal.

For ANH, most likely I'll be doing two angles for the crawl, where one is the "A New Hope" crawl and the other is the original. Sabers will be redone also. What I'd really like to do is one of those seamless branching things where you can choose to view the film with or without my video enhancements. We'll see how that goes.
Post
#88903
Topic
<strong>The &quot;EditDroid&quot; Trilogy DVD Info and Feedback Thread</strong> (Released)
Time
I think the problem comes in where people think I'm going insane and flame is shooting out of my eyesockets because I used a cussword. Which isn't so. I guarantee almost everyone here, in the course of their normal day, cusses at least 10 times.


Well I don't do that. No, really, I don't. But the difference is I know that's how most people are and I'm used to it. The bottom line is that Jay doesn't have a problem with it for the most part and I'm not going to do anything about it except in extreme cases.


DanielB the only reason these threads get into these off topic discussions is because of your influence. Either stick to the topic at hand or don't post at all. Stop flooding every thread you go into with your crap theories.
Post
#88798
Topic
<strong>The &quot;EditDroid&quot; Trilogy DVD Info and Feedback Thread</strong> (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: The Bizzle
Everything's fine. We're all adults, let's not try and babysit each other, pander and condescend like we need to be handled with kid gloves or something.


He's right. You guys don't need to be babysat. For the most part we have some great discussions here. At times things might get out of hand and that's where I come in. The only thing that really annoys me is when a thread gets way off topic. Let's not let that happen in here.

Bizzle brings up some great points, and I think they deserve to be addressed.
Post
#87586
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time
Originally posted by: Yoda Is Your Father
I think the original Alien DVD, form like 5 years ago, has the correct logo. But is anyone listening to me about the featurette on the bonus disc??? If not, whatever, just stick anything on that looks similar - the modern 2004 logo is too modern.


Looks to me like the original Alien DVD logo is the one to go with. I'll probably use it on my own DVD.

Skyman posted screenshots from the bonus disc of the LFL logo and the "A long time ago" here. No Fox logo though. I don't think it was on there.
Post
#87567
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
Thanks!

Originally posted by: The Bizzle
the starburst behind the title?? Make it initially WAY more intense, to where it very briefly whites out the whole screen--and as the white recedes back into space, have the "Empire Strikes Back" fade in, (not wipe in) in direct response to the light fading back behind the Star Wars logo. So the starburst basically looks like it's leaving the title behind in it's wake.


I really like this idea. I'm going to try it out.
Post
#87446
Topic
.: The Zion DVD Project :. (Released)
Time
The new clip is up! (6.5MB, requires XviD codec)

Again, not the best quality clip, but it gets the job done. The sound effects might seem a little cheesy, but I'll let you guys decide that for yourselves. This is still a work in progress as well. I'm entertaining the thought of adding a ship fly-by that leaves the episode title in it's wake instead of the current wipe-in method. What do you guys think?