This user has been banned.
Davnes007 said:
YubNubGuy said:
Davnes007 said:
I can hear the ban-hammer....it's getting closer.
THIS IS EVEN FUNNER THAN TWITTER FOR ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Some other people here are thinking the same thing.
ARE R U ON TWITTER??????????????
AntcuFaalb said:
YubNubGuy said:
AntcuFaalb said:
YubNubGuy: So you're back to the image-only posts so soon?
Off-Topic Forums=NO RULES HERE YEAH BABY YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, that's true, but you're missing the point.
Image-only posts in Off Topic are great if they make sense when viewed in the context of the thread.
You're just moving from thread to thread, posting nonsensical garbage wherever possible.
You're trying to get banned, so I'll help you along myself.
E-mail sent to Jay.
I'm am sorry. I apologize for mistenterperting the rules. Can either you or Jay please clarify the off-topic forum rules for 4 me? I had read Jay's rules, he says that you can post whatever you U want here. Correct me If I am wrong, but that's is how i've haved interperted jay's rules that are R here.!!!
Jay said that there are R no rules here. Just because I mistenerperted that, that doesn't mean that U you gotta go get me in trouble and ban me, because you are under the false assumption that I knew about Jay's off topic rules at the time. Now I know. Get over it!!!
Davnes007 said:
I can hear the ban-hammer....it's getting closer.
THIS IS EVEN FUNNER THAN TWITTER FOR ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Davnes007 said:
I guess this is the best threat for you, isn't it.
;)
AntcuFaalb said:
YubNubGuy: So you're back to the image-only posts so soon?
Off-Topic Forums=NO RULES HERE YEAH BABY YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Davnes007 said:
YubNubGuy said:
Image-only posts = FAIL
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sextant.
Off topic forums section=image only posts allowed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Davnes007 said:
So........when's next time the world's supposed to end?
After I watch the epic rap battles of history, "genghis khan vs the easter bunny", and "sarah palin vs ladyboyman gaga", and "abraham lincoln vs chuck norris", and "cleopatra vs marilyn monroe"!!!!!!!!!!!
Davnes007 said:
Movie reviews on YouTube?
When did this start?
And 40 mins long? Is that....legal?
Why wouldn't it be legal? If the copyright owners wouldn't care/complain if you showed parts of your movie, why would they care if it's is also condensed into one big large video?????
adywan said:
YubNubGuy said:
How did You U know that it was me? Even if I was at the house of my friends and &buddies, I bettcha that ya guys/dudes would still recognize that it was me. I, on the other hand, cannot tell if one of you guys has made a duplicate account or not!!!!!!
I explained exactly how we always know it is you already here:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/What-do-you-LIKE-about-the-EU/post/616085/#TopicPost616085
That explanation is NOT satystfying at all. I find that bullshitcrap explanation very hard to believe/even to take seriously.
goldfunk said:
Some may think it's blasphemous.... But there's a fan edit of the entire 12 hours of the SW saga, cut down to one three-hour movie...just focusing on the story of Anakin, from when he was a little boy, until he becomes Darth Vader and is redeemed by his son.
Umm. How is that blasphemous in any way, shape or form whatsoever????
I don't understand how Darth Vader/anakin skywalker was "redeemed" in any way, shape, or form. So, switching your religion and converting to the lightside/the good side of the force and saving your own flesh and blood biological son redeems you from 20-something-or-so years of enslaving inncocent alien civilians and wookies, commiting galactic genocide, not to mention blowing up a defeneless planet filled with 2 billion innocent civilians people and possibly even more planets, even more billions, and possibly maybe even trillions? Give me a freaking break, will ya, George Georgey toy boy luke lucas!!!!!!!!!!
TV's Frink said:
adywan said:
How many accounts are you going to make, and then get banned with? In fact the last time i saw someone doing this exact same thing was JediTray. Could this be the return of the tray? And hadn't he been banned from the same sites that farter_skywalker_BumRubGuy claims he has been?
Based on posting style, I think it's more likely this guy.
No. It aint me!!!!!!!!!!
darth_ender said:
Keep posting here, YubNub! You're winning me converts!!!!!!
darth_ender said:
By the unanimous vote of all twister111s here, I am starting a thread devoted to the debate of abortion.
Those who know my style know I'm generally fairly middle ground and am good at seeing others' perspectives and trying to be accommodating. You will find no such middle ground here. I feel abortion should only be permitted when the mother's health is severely at risk, be it physical or mental, meaning following rape/incest. Even then, I feel it should not be a default decision, but rather a well-thought one. I will never understanding how someone can feel so passionately about women's rights that they feel justified in removing the right to life of another human. Even if I did not believe in God, I could never support this practice. How can we protect the lives of endangered animals and plants, yet treat unborn human life as trivial because we are not endangered? I'll never understand it. But you're welcome to try to make me. I'm ready to be outnumbered, but I assure you I am will not cop out on this topic.
Because unborn embryo's have no feelings or sensations. That's is why I am very strongly pro choice, at the very least in that area of subject/topic..!!!!
George Carlin would explain himself perfectly if he were still alive.
1990osu said:
Also, black and white should not have died;) It co-existed with color from the 1930s to the 1960s. It should have remained an option.
Ugh, meh!!!!!
TheBoost said:
There are reviews of The Hobbit, that came out 1 week ago today, on youtube, that are 40 min long. Some of them are already days old, meaning within a day of seeing the movie these people were writing and editing their reviews.
1: Is it really possible to give THAT much in depth analysis to a film you just saw for the first time, even if you watch it twice in two days? Does lengthy film critique require time for reflection?
2: Do these people actually like movies, or just wait for something to review?
Meh. It's is probably a combination of the two both reasons, I guess so, my friends and buddies!!!!!
darth_ender said:
To be more broad in scope than the Dogs Wearing Hats thread, I'm starting this so we can talk about any troll and if they are making forays into the forum under different identities.
So were these two threads started by the real Father Skywalker?
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/What-specifically-did-the-Galactic-Empire-plan-on-using-the-Second-Death-Star-For/topic/15004/
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Were-Princess-Leias-adoptive-parents-on-Alderaan-when-it-exploded/topic/15003/
Boy, in spite of my intended mocking, I simply can't come up with such lengthy posts when spoofing the guy.
How did You U know that it was me? Even if I was at the house of my friends and &buddies, I bettcha that ya guys/dudes would still recognize that it was me. I, on the other hand, cannot tell if one of you guys has made a duplicate account or not!!!!!!
AntcuFaalb said:
YubNubGuy: Be careful. Image-only posts will get you banned.
Those images don't even make sense in the context of this thread. Save that shit for the Off Topic section, please.
I'm not a mod, so this is just some friendly advice.
OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
darth_ender said:
I admit to pushing him to write as many as possible :D I've got lots of new material for my Bill Will thread now!
Many of my silly posts that I've have/had written today which many other users would probably interpert as trollish/spamming/flaming are just responses to you. We are R joking around with each other!!!!!
adywan said:
Oh great, he's back again. So you went from Farter Skywanker to BumRubGuy.
How many accounts are you going to make, and then get banned with? In fact the last time i saw someone doing this exact same thing was JediTray. Could this be the return of the tray? And hadn't he been banned from the same sites that farter_skywalker_BumRubGuy claims he has been?
Well, it won't be long before we will see yet another account from you because you're going to get banned again. Maybe if you had waited for a reply from the mods before making your multiple accounts, you may have stood a better chance of getting back on these forums, but what you are doing is only going to piss the Mods off even more.
Adywan, even if I try to act like a completley different user and a completley different person here (this happened on the rebelscum forums too), people still recognize me immediatley. Why is that????
Also, witch/which websites has JediTray been banned from????
Rebelscum forums is the most stupidest website that I've have ever ever. they blocked totally 100% from their/the website, they've have had even blocked me even from reading those forums and the threads and the posts, not just from posting. On Twitter, I was banned for making a duplicate account. I aint exactly sure why I was banned the first time from/on Twitter, and I dind't feel like waiting another week or a two weeks or a few more weeks for a response to my unban rquest, so there Ya Go, I've have a made a new Twitter account, witch/which is banned too!!!!!
I was falsely accused of trolling from this original trilogy forum website. I've have already posted and mentioned that my intention was not to troll or to flame or to spam. I've have already emailed these website administrators/moderators, but they take too so long, forever, if ever to respond, so I've have created a new duplicate account as a very quick and a very easy way to send a private message to a moderator/administator that is here, without sending an email to the website administrator/moderator.