logo Sign In

Williarob

User Group
Members
Join date
9-Apr-2007
Last activity
16-Jun-2025
Posts
915
Web Site
http://www.thestarwarstrilogy.com

Post History

Post
#1010410
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Wow. We’re already at over 160 people asking for an invite to the private topic. The good news is that, inspired by suggestions to switch to Discord, I suddenly remembered what my day job is - I build websites! So last night I very quickly threw together a new private forum site, where nobody will be excluded for failing to post here in time, and where we can split the project up into several topics, so that all the people obsessed with the exact color of the Tantive walls can discuss it ad nauseum in a thread dedicated just to that topic, while the rest of us have the real fun reading about Turkey Sandwiches and the things that really matter.

Like the Legacy Site (which I also worked on), this one requires registration in order to see the Project forum. I’m still in the process of setting it all up, but if you want to head on over there and register, then we can start getting back to normal.

http://forums.thestarwarstrilogy.com/index.php

Please use the same username as you do here on OT.

Post
#1009950
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

yoda-sama said:


Since I’m posting anyway, I’m glad to be on the list and am looking forward to the private topic. But seriously, we should probably try to start respecting the request to keep things quiet and all try to hold our thoughts till the private topic starts (unless something hilarious is said, of course). Would anyone be opposed to an official person to send PMs to to get added to the list? I’m not responsible or attentive enough to volunteer, so I’ll leave that to someone else to decide, but anything is better than flooding a thread that doesn’t want attention.

#TeamTurkeySandwichEdition

Actually it is better if people keep requesting here in the thread. That way my script will automatically add all those requesting to be added, and there is no chance of missing anybody. While it means that the thread will continue to be bumped repeatedly for the next few hours, hopefully nobody will miss out. Once it goes private, activity here will cease for some time - except of course for those poor lost souls who didn’t read about this in time and are begging to be added…

All 20+ pages will be rechecked, but you MUST have written at least one post somewhere in this thread to get an invite. Even if you only plan on lurking in the new thread you must write something here or I won’t know to invite you. If you have already posted earlier in the thread there is no need to write another post.

Post
#1009865
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

TV’s Frink said:

jedimasterobiwan said:

Williarob said:

yoda-sama said:

Still, what front page do you refer to? Have stuff about the project not be front and center on thestarwarstrilogy.com project website or cease traffic on this thread for a while and get it off the short list of active OT.com threads?

Both actually. I don’t want to break any links though, so the only way to push it off the front page at thestarwarstrilogy.com is to post more (unrelated) content, and I’m working on that but it will take a while.

could you at least give us a clue and will this effect adywan’s edit. please answer both

Williarob, I heard from a source that you’re having a turkey sandwich for lunch today. Please let us know what effect this will have on adywan’s edit or I’m afraid we’re going to have to kick you off the forum.

LOL. Once again I find myself wishing this forum had a “like” Button…

Post
#1009830
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

So, I wrote a little script that went through all 21 pages and pulled out a list of all the unique usernames who posted to this thread so far (isn’t being a programmer great?!)

At this point we have:

Williarob
NeverarGreat
Sherman
Chief Mouse
Chewtobacca
fmalover
Darth Lucas
camroncamera
althor1138
pittrek
theMaestro
laserbawz
quin82
Swazzy
Blackout
pathustler85
Mavimao
Beber
Shuggy
AllAboutThatSpace
darthrush
DrDre
UnitéD2
Memorex
yoda-sama
Discostu
Tyrphanax
yotsuya
Dek Rollins
BobaJett
alexp120
dahmage
Dreamaster
vexedmedia
age
Nick66
FrankT
joefavs
ElectricTriangle
Booman
RDPlissken
clutchins
oohteedee
Molly
towne32
jdryyz
LexX
thorr
Handman
Mackey256
emanswfan
Jeffgale26
ray_afraid
TV’s Frink
Cobra Kai
dlvh
nightstalkerpoet
canofhumdingers
Colson
pleasehello
jedimasterobiwan
Tobar
Density
detola
The Bull’s Eyed Womprat
FekLeyrTarg
hairy_hen
^…^
corellian77
77FN
flametitan
IcePrick
Wazzles
LHSmarchingredcoat
Stotchy
RooBee
John Doom
SkyDude
Jan
puzosep
JasonA
abouttreefitty
Kingherb
DragoonClawNZ
CHEWBAKAspelledwrong
TR2N
SkyderHouseMafia
Jorel81
peter_pan
Hal 9000
Melatius
Jim_e

I’ll give it another day or two before creating a private thread, because as far as I know, there is no way to add somebody to a private thread after it has been created. So if you haven’t posted something here by the time I create that thread, you’re out of luck… In other words, speak up now if you want to be included.

Post
#1009526
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

jedimasterobiwan said:

Williarob said:

yoda-sama said:

Still, what front page do you refer to? Have stuff about the project not be front and center on thestarwarstrilogy.com project website or cease traffic on this thread for a while and get it off the short list of active OT.com threads?

Both actually. I don’t want to break any links though, so the only way to push it off the front page at thestarwarstrilogy.com is to post more (unrelated) content, and I’m working on that but it will take a while.

could you at least give us a clue and will this effect adywan’s edit. please answer both

  1. No.
  2. Honestly I don’t know what any of this has to do with Adywan so I’m going to make a guess that it will not affect his edit in the slightest.
Post
#1009515
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

yoda-sama said:

Still, what front page do you refer to? Have stuff about the project not be front and center on thestarwarstrilogy.com project website or cease traffic on this thread for a while and get it off the short list of active OT.com threads?

Both actually. I don’t want to break any links though, so the only way to push it off the front page at thestarwarstrilogy.com is to post more (unrelated) content, and I’m working on that but it will take a while.

Post
#1009513
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

AllAboutThatSpace said:

Plus one for private thread please! Don’t have too much to contribute except encouragement, celluloid knowledge and opinions, lots of opinions 😉 I won’t post here again so it slips down the rankings. Best wishes!

It’s alright I didn’t expect the thread to drop off the top of the list today, but hopefully it will over the next week or two.

Sorry to be so cryptic but Mike specifically requested that we “keep it in the pants” and I believe it is in everybody’s best interest that we comply with that.

The private thread idea is a good one, but is there a way to add members to the private thread after it is created? I don’t see one and would hate to exclude anyone. If somebody wants to create a private topic and invite everybody who ever commented in this thread to it - I’m happy to keep the discussion going. I know it would be helpful to Dre - the feedback on the colors has been most helpful.

If one of the mods could convert this thread into a private topic that would be even better.

Post
#1009458
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Due to er… new developments over on the Legacy Edition Site, I’ve decided I’m going to take this project underground for a while. Work will continue as normal, just not so publicly.

I’m not really sure if projects like this one will help or hinder Mike’s quest, but just in case it might do the latter, perhaps we should let this topic slide down the list and off the front page for a while…

Post
#1009366
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

puzosep said:

Williarob said:

As promised here are shots 71-80, No DNR:

https://we.tl/rEu9HvfgOA

This is HEVC again, but this time using the MainConcept encoder which should be better than Handbrake.

This Encoder barely bad, smoothing/killing fine grain and encoding latency. Optimize from grain and 40+Mbps datarate. This 16Mbps bitrate too small in 4K. Previous HB versions 60Mbps sample encodes better and great quality.

small grain
encoding latency

Used MPC-HC from playing/capture the image. (and very old P4 PC. :S)

Thanks
puzosep

First of all these are just sample videos. Second of all, the whole point of H.265 is that you don’t need such a high bitrate to achieve the same quality as H.264. The Mainconcept Encoder offers quality rates between 1 and 30 where 30 is the best possible quality (unlike Handbrake where closer to 0 is higher quality). This was encoded at 27. The last 4K H.264 Handbrake encodes were encoded at Placebo quality and were still just 20 MB/S. Thirdly, there is no tuning h.265 for grain or anything else. It’s just not an option.

I considered uploading a ProRes version but I don’t think anybody here really wants to download a 3+ GB file for just 48 seconds of video. And I don’t really want to upload it either. It’s way too early to start worrying about the final encode settings, but don’t worry I’ll make sure the quality is as high is possible.

Post
#1009128
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

towne32 said:

Williarob said:

As promised here are shots 71-80, No DNR:

https://we.tl/rEu9HvfgOA

This is HEVC again, but this time using the MainConcept encoder which should be better than Handbrake.

The cleanup looks great.

This is before additional color work by Dre?

That is correct. Dre gave me a single LUT to correct the whole reel, which has been applied here, and then he makes some more shot by shot corrections from there.

I’ll let you guys and Dre hammer out the final colors while I move on to shots 81-90 which includes a couple of shots with some frames missing in some of the prints…

Post
#1008950
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Nobody is more sick of looking at shots on the Tantive than me (except possibly Dre!), believe me. Unfortunately, the process I have in place requires a lot of setup: First I copy all of the frames from each source onto a drive (and given the size I can barely manage half a reel at a time). Then I have to write an AVISynth script to sync every source to the GOUT and make a note of all the missing frame numbers in each source. Next I have another script that sorts all the frames from each source into folders based on the shot number and source. This is so that the next script, this time in Photoshop can go through and register the images, and generate the dirtmaps. Another script run in After Effects brings all of these new files into a new Composition where I can make sure they line up, color match the sources after using Dre’s tools to generate the LUTs, let the dirt map do it’s thing and output those files to yet another folder where they are picked up in PFClean and manually cleaned some more, before being rendered again. Finally, I open the cleaned shots in After Effects, apply Dre’s LUT, do some cropping and render that out again as a completed shot. Every render has to be lossless so it all takes up GB and GB of space.

Unfortunately, this means that I have to process all the shots in order. I don’t have the luxury of being able to bounce around, reel to reel, willy nilly. I just don’t have the disk space to process the whole film this way. This is also why I can’t just work on the SE shots first and get Harmy started on his project sooner.

However, I do have the next 10 shots ready for you, so you’ll get your first look at Darth Vader and Princess Leia. I’ll upload them ASAP.

Post
#1008846
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

yotsuya said:

I have one question. You may have covered this already, but aren’t the prints you are using missing some frames? I know the SSE was. Are you going to just use the frames you have or add them back so this will sync with the GOUT soundtracks. And if you add them back what source are you going to use?

Yes, all of these prints are missing some frames. The LPP was only missing frames at the reel changes, but the other prints are all missing other frames too. I will be keeping the GOUT sync as I think that is very important because it allows us all to choose from a growing library of audio and subtitle tracks.

There are a variety of techniques I can use to restore missing frames, each with their own pros and cons:

  1. If there are just one or two frames missing the middle of a shot, PFClean’s Fix Frame effect can often be used to extrapolate or interpolate the missing frames. When it works, the new frames are seamless to the viewer. However, if you were to overlay one of these frames on top of an original frame from another source, they may not match up perfectly, especially if there was a single frame laser blast or something that the software has no way to predict. Also, it only works well about half the time. If there is any camera panning, there is often unusual cropping or other weirdness that ruins the new frame(s).

  2. Use a frame from another source (preferably another print, but the blu-ray if it cannot be found anywhere else). The advantage here is that we know we are not missing anything and that the frame is the right frame, the difficulty comes in making it look seamless. The colors, sharpness, size, rotation and cropping all have to match perfectly or you can see the difference. For this reason, it is often better to substitute the entire shot with that from another source.

  3. Sometimes, particularly if there is little or no motion, frames can simply be repeated.

  4. Photoshop. Using, for example the blu-ray frame as a guide, the previous frame and the next frame can be manually adjusted in Photoshop.

  5. A black or “Frame Missing” frame can be inserted, but of all of the solutions this is a last resort. I don’t know about you but I’d rather have a single slightly blurry frame than a black Flash!

I’ll do everything I can to make it as seamless as possible.

Post
#1008832
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Dek Rollins said:

Williarob said:

[Swazzy said:]

I feel confident in predicting that I will like 4K77 enough to masturbate to it.

LOL we should make this the project tag line.

How come your quote says Swazzy instead of Shuggy? And there’s also no link.

Sorry, I was trying to edit out some of the text above to isolate this fine quote on my phone and backspaced a bit too far. I’ll fix it.

Post
#1008567
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

AllAboutThatSpace said:


On a technical note, although the new longer sample looks terrific, I preferred the old encoding. I think it was mentioned above, but H264 is making this one a little gravelly in the busier shots, in my opinion.
Thanks so much for the hard work!

You’re welcome. I used Handbrake to do both the H265 and H264 encodes. Interestingly, even when I set the H264 to the placebo setting it still only produced a 280 MB H264 file. The 1080p version was almost exactly the same size (279 MB) which seems a bit fishy to me - I would have expected the 4K to be 4 times as big. Not too worried about it at the moment though. Still a long way to go before the final encodes begin!

Post
#1008565
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

NeverarGreat said:

I wasn’t trying to start any drama, I just wanted to clarify if this was a new scan or not. It’s sometimes difficult to determine what sources are new or not, with so many floating around here. And that’s exciting! It feels like a renaissance of Star Wars around here recently, with things happening so fast it can make your head spin.

No worries. I just had visions of everything spiraling out of control like it did earlier this year, with everyone freaking out about the prints, me getting banned and all of you missing out on something pretty cool.

I’ve had this other Tech scan since December 2014 and some of it was actually used in the SSE - most notably shots that included a star field in Reels 1 and 3, since most of those stars were too faded on our scan of the LPP.

Meanwhile the work continues. I cleaned two more shots today, bringing the tally up to 78 shots completed (26% of Reel 1). The first 15 “shots” include the Fox intro, logos and title cards, Crawl and Flyover. I currently only have all that on Eastman stock at 2k, (Plus the ANH version at 4k and a 35mm '97 Special Edition version also at 4k) so most of that is currently just upscaled SSE at the moment. It looks pretty good, but not quite as good as the footage that follows it. Hopefully I can get a new 4k scan of all of that before the project is complete, and can come back to that section later.

Post
#1008209
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

theMaestro said:

Williarob, have you experimented with Mike Verta’s technique of layering different prints in order to remove grain & get closer to the o-neg’s grain structure? I guess it’s not the goal to implement such a thing for this project, but if you manage to figure that out then future projects could perhaps look even better than Legacy. Because it does seem like you now have the absolute best prints to work with and so the only step remaining to surpass Legacy would be Verta’s grain removal technique.

I have tried averaging the layers on a single frame (using this technique: http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-averaging-noise.htm), and the results were pretty good. However, I don’t have as many prints as Mike does (nor as much time and patience). As I understand it, Mike has some proprietary software that carefully examines the pixels in each layer and makes choices based on how many match/don’t match? Something like that. I don’t think he’s just averaging the layers and since I don’t know exactly what he is doing, it’s hard to try it out.

I can tell you that for the layering to work, every layer of every frame has to be perfectly aligned, and color matched and that any dirt or damage on any of the layers will come through at least faintly if averaged, so all layers would have to be cleaned of dirt first. There may be a way to Median or Subtract or Add or some kind of blend mode that gets around this problem, I just don’t know.

On top of this, our scan of the LPP is not nearly so sharp as the Tech and Eastman scans, so if I throw that in there it may soften details and result in losing some detail rather than gaining it though for most shots I suppose the Blu-ray could be thrown in there too to offset that, if you were so inclined.

So the answer to your question is, I’d love to try it out and I’m open to suggestions. But just aligning and color matching two prints at a time is a lot of work and gigabytes of data!

And that right there ^ is why Mike Verta looks down on projects like this one. He’s a perfectionist. He took the time to get better scans and to make sure he had all the disk space he needed, and he did spend the time aligning each frame of every layer. His attention to detail, and the amount of time and effort he was willing to pour into his project is just way above anything that we are willing to do, and that is what will always make Legacy Edition superior to any other project, and I’m fine with that. That’s why I didn’t get upset by what he said about the Silver Screen Edition. He was just stating the facts as he saw them. Compared to Legacy Edition, I expect the SSE does look pretty crappy, and no doubt this project does too. I do think he rather missed the point of our project though, which wasn’t to compete with Legacy or to make the best version of Star Wars ever. The point was to try and reproduce the theatrical experience of watching the LPP print projected and I think we achieved that quite well. The point of this project of course is to make the best version of Star Wars ever, (so far, not including Legacy Edition), and I still think we are on par to hit that goal.

I don’t have the time or the experience or the knowledge or the resources that Mike has. That’s why I’m still really hoping he succeeds with Disney. I’d rather watch Legacy Edition than this project, and I’m sure most of you would too.

But I do enjoy working on the film. It gives me something to do during my down time, and figuring out ways to improve the quality, to speed up the process, to automate the repetitive processes with scripting, it’s that sort of thing that makes it fun to me. Part of the reason I am sharing the experience with all of you is because I need your encouragement to keep going. Now that I have figured out most of the “how”, it is just a matter of doing. Knowing that all of you are eagerly waiting for more gives me a reason to do some more.

So, thanks for sticking with me.

Post
#1008150
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Swazzy said:

Oh no, I didn’t mean that at all. I was referring to him commenting on whether or not this restoration has the photography right, and the insight he might have that we don’t in terms of accuracy, etc…

That would be nice, but if Mike Verta makes any comment at all, it will probably be more along the lines of “Still looks like crap compared to Legacy”, “f**k Negative One” and “if you like it so much go masturbate to it”. Those were his comments on the Silver Screen Edition anyway (I’m probably paraphrasing the first comment, but the second two are direct quotes), so I’m not expecting much in the way of constructive criticism from that direction…

Post
#1008118
Topic
Project #4K77
Time

Also, if you don’t believe me, and this thread is about to turn into another “He said/she said” pissing contest about Mike Verta and whether or not I have the “rights” to use the scans I have, then I’m out of here right now. I am not going through that again. I’d rather shut down the project. But think about it - at the end of the day, I’ll still have Star Wars in 4k. What will you have?