logo Sign In

Wazzles

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Dec-2013
Last activity
17-Jun-2025
Posts
1,167

Post History

Post
#1042380
Topic
Most pointless Special Edition change?
Time

crissrudd4554 said:

Wazzles said:

Oh! Oh! I have one! The recomped crawl in Star Wars! Why didn’t they just use the 81 crawl? It’s just as good as the 97.

True. I never really understood why the SW logo had to recede faster in the SE. The only thing I do like that the SE crawl did was begin to roll up before the SW logo faded out. At least that way it fits with the other episodes.

They could have easily done it digitally without recomping every single element. It just seems like they went to a lot of work for not a lot of pay off.

Post
#1042379
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

digitalfreaknyc said:

doubleofive said:

  1. Most 4K discs can be found for $25-30, the same price DVD or Blu-ray was at first.
  2. You’re telling me you wouldn’t pay $45 each for a 4k restoration of the OOT? I’d be first in line.

That boxed set with the extras retailed for, if memory serves, $250 in 1993. Figure that out with inflation. That was totally worth it back then.

About $415-420.

Post
#1040992
Topic
Star Wars THX "Faces" DVD Covers (Finished)
Time

oojason said:
Wazzles - thanks mate, will see what I can do later on with the picture on the back (I may have to install this free GIMP software instead of just trying to get by with MS Paint - it may be becoming apparent why I usually stick to white inksaver sets 😉)

I’m impressed what you’ve actually been able to accomplish with MS Paint. I would definitely reccomend GIMP, but there will be a bit of a learning curve.

Post
#1036764
Topic
Raiders of the Lost Ark 35mm LPP Theatrical Experience - v1.0 (Released)
Time

litemakr said:

Wazzles said:

litemakr said:

Wazzles said:

No, fewer digital changes than the blu-ray. You are probably thinking of the HD version of the Lowry DVD master, which had a CG re-do of the car going off the cliff. The wowow is a newer 4K remaster done for the 2011 30th anniversary and has much more accurate color than the blu-ray.

I thought it had some recomped elements and also erased the guiding rod for the boulder?

Yes, it has the same digital tweaks as the DVD but not the additional ones added to the blu-ray or the CGI shot from the HD Lowry version.

I thought the Blu Ray was closer to the theatrical. What was changed?

Post
#1036710
Topic
The Original Trilogy restored from 35mm prints (a WIP)
Time

poita said:

Power is back on, PC won’t boot. No Internet here yet either. Going to open the PC up tonight to see what the trouble is. We rent, so the house damage isn’t our concern at least, and the house has been secured so all is good on that front, but we sustained some water damage inside. It looks like we had a power surge or brownout issue though as the fridge is dead and the PC etc seems to have problems. Will update as I work though it.

Good to hear about the house. Hopefully all that’s wrong with the computer is the power supply. Were you using a surge protector?

Post
#1036708
Topic
Raiders of the Lost Ark 35mm LPP Theatrical Experience - v1.0 (Released)
Time

litemakr said:

Wazzles said:

No, fewer digital changes than the blu-ray. You are probably thinking of the HD version of the Lowry DVD master, which had a CG re-do of the car going off the cliff. The wowow is a newer 4K remaster done for the 2011 30th anniversary and has much more accurate color than the blu-ray.

I thought it had some recomped elements and also erased the guiding rod for the boulder?

Post
#1036380
Topic
Machete Order? mmm
Time

Slart said:

I’ve never understood machete order. It seems like it’s just a half-assed way to try and do something with the PT. Like it’s there in the pile and you have to put it somewhere.

It’s really better to just ditch it, IMO. What are you missing? It’s sad, yeah, but that’s just the way it turned out. I don’t watch the holiday special either.

That’s why it was created, for those who did want to include the prequels in some way. The guy who has the website basically says if you don’t like the prequels, don’t watch them.

Post
#1036065
Topic
Do you think Disney will release the unaltered versions for DVD and blue ray?
Time

a_o said:

Have the interpositives that were created to be telecined to master tape for the Laserdisc/VHS releases beeb destroyed? that’d probably be the highest quality source for official remastering, right?

I doubt that they’d destroy them unless they were seriously low on space. Assuming they were made on low fade stock, they would be a decent source. I read previously that they were on an excessively grainy stock, however, which is not indicative of the films themselves. If I’m not mistaken, Kodak’s mid-80’s motion picture film was known for being way too grainy, not only causing headaches for film makes like James Cameron, but also being what the Star Wars home video IPs were made with. Despite how grainy they are, they’d still be a good source if they were to do a quick and dirty home video transfer, since all they would have to do is some clean up and throw a soundtrack on it.

Post
#1036063
Topic
Machete Order? mmm
Time

TV’s Frink said:

I wouldn’t recommend it to someone who hasn’t seen Star Wars before, but personally I’d go

RO
SW
ESB
ROTJ
TFA

I think chronological works just fine as long as you leave the prequels out.

This isn’t a bad order, but I feel like RO is superfluous to the story. You get all the backstory you need in SW, and by cutting out RO it remains more tonally consistent.

That said, I think a modern Machete Order would be something like this:
RO
SW
ESB
AOTC
ROTS
ROTJ
TFA

Not that I would ever want to watch it this way, but it’s certainly an option.